On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:51:40 -0500
"Stephane R." writes, and having
writ moves on:
>Can I never receive a message from u again
>
>Sent from my iPad
>
If you look at the headers of every message, including your own, you
will find the following header.
On Thu 2017-02-16 11:51:07 -0500, Werner Koch wrote:
> So that the /var/run/user/ directory is not cluttered with many
> directories. Setting a different GNUPGHOME is an exception and thus it
> is fine to require an explicit creation. Remember that not /var/run
> does not need to be a temporary
On Thu 2017-02-16 04:12:36 -0500, Justus Winter wrote:
> That is still wrong. The length of the path of the socket is not
> limited in any way, the length of the path passed to connect is.
this is a clever approach to *connect* to such a socket, on some
systems.
But if you ever use getsockname
Hello,
Thanks a lot for your report in detail, in the style which I can replicate.
I'm afraid you are facing same issue what I encountered in 2011.
CHANGE REFERENCE DATA (OpenPGP card specification 2.0):
https://www.gniibe.org/log/bugreport/gnupg/openpgp-card-spec-2.0-chenge-reference-data.html
On 2/16/17, Stephane R. wrote:
> Can I never receive a message from u again
You, or someone with access to your device, subscribed your e-mail
address to this mailing list. A mailing list is a discussion list,
based on e-mail.
You need to unsubscribe yourself.
> Could you please provide us instructions how to upgrade 2.0.14 to 2.1.18
> and also rollback instructions if anything goes wrong.
This is a system administration question. You will have better luck
asking on a mailing list devoted to your specific operating system.
Can I never receive a message from u again
Sent from my iPad
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hello Team
Could you please provide us instructions how to upgrade 2.0.14 to 2.1.18 and
also rollback instructions if anything goes wrong.
Thank you
Regards
G Srikanth
Srikanth Gangisetty
Database Technology Consultant
Interoute,
New Castle House
Castle Boulevard, Nottingham
NG7 1FT UK
direct
Hi all,
I'm sort of new to GPG/PGP, I'm not new to the encryption/crypto world and
to computers, however, some concepts are yet not clear to me.
I can't get my head around on how to use GPG in the "correct" way to
guarantee the maximum result. That is: protect, at the best, my privacy and
also
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 18:12, d...@fifthhorseman.net said:
> Why does this need to be created manually? Why not try to create it if
> possible the first time there's a chance to use it, no matter what?
So that the /var/run/user/ directory is not cluttered with many
directories. Setting a
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:12, jus...@g10code.com said:
> That is still wrong. The length of the path of the socket is not
> limited in any way, the length of the path passed to connect is.
That is your experience from Linux but that is not in general true. The
maximum length of a file length is
Daniel Kahn Gillmor [2017-02-15 13:46:13-05] wrote:
> right, so your use of "trust-model direct" switches the meaning of the
> "trust" flag from its usual "ownertrust" semantics to be what we'd
> normally call "validity".
>
> Note also that when you mark a key itself as "trusted" in this way,
>
Hi,
Jean-François Schaff writes:
> Thank you Justus for your advice, I could fix that and use the lib
> from Python.
Good.
> I had not realized that both gpg and gpg2 are installed by default on
> Ubuntu 16.04 LTS.
How is that related to your problem?
> Do you know if
Hi,
2017-02-13 11:46 GMT+01:00 Justus Winter :
> Hi :)
>
> Jean-François Schaff writes:
>
>> I'm new to gpg, and trying to use the Python bindings included in
>> PGPME. I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 LTS.
>>
>> I have done the following things:
> ...
>> - compiled
Dear Yutaka,
>
> Let us show more info about your key. I'm afraid your key size
> is not the one OpenPGP card supports. I tested RSA-2048 with
> OpenPGP card version 2.1, it works fine for me.
> --
>
==
1. Moving keys to card
==
Using the correct default
I work in an organization where we sometimes receive and send encrypted files.
This is far from our core business and we are no experts on this, so please
bear with me.
For managing the files, we use scripts calling gpg.exe. This is a Windows
environment.
We have been running version 1.2.2 for
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> [ Unknown signature status ]
> Hi all--
>
> sorry for the late followup on this thread:
>
> On Mon 2017-01-16 14:16:28 -0500, Werner Koch wrote:
>> On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 00:39, gn...@jelmail.com said:
>>> Just experimenting in a sandbox
17 matches
Mail list logo