Re: A better interface to the GnuPG-Framework (Re: EasyGnuPG)

2016-03-22 Thread Dashamir Hoxha
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Paolo Bolzoni < paolo.bolzoni.br...@gmail.com> wrote: > I guess we should start from the desired use case. > We want a GUI for what? Encrypting? Signing? Managing the web of > trust? SSH login? Everything? I think that deciding the desired use case(s) is

Re: A better interface to the GnuPG-Framework (Re: EasyGnuPG)

2016-03-22 Thread Ben McGinnes
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:45:09PM +0100, Bernhard Reiter wrote: > On Tuesday 22 March 2016 at 15:14:41, Ben McGinnes wrote: > > You know what might, though, if someone were to take up the old GPA > > project perhaps ... maybe port it to GTK 3 or implement a Qt version. > > We have just cleanup

Re: A better interface to the GnuPG-Framework (Re: EasyGnuPG)

2016-03-22 Thread Paolo Bolzoni
I guess we should start from the desired use case. We want a GUI for what? Encrypting? Signing? Managing the web of trust? SSH login? Everything? On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Bernhard Reiter wrote: > On Tuesday 22 March 2016 at 15:14:41, Ben McGinnes wrote: >> You

A better interface to the GnuPG-Framework (Re: EasyGnuPG)

2016-03-22 Thread Bernhard Reiter
On Tuesday 22 March 2016 at 15:14:41, Ben McGinnes wrote: > You know what might, though, if someone were to take up the old GPA > project perhaps ... maybe port it to GTK 3 or implement a Qt version. We have just cleanup and simplified the structure of Kleopatra, so that is making steps into the