Re: En-/Decryption speed for large files (GnuPG and Gpg4win)

On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 01:57:59 + (UTC) Shannon Mess via Gnupg-users wrote: > Can someone please remove my email address from this group! This has > nothing to do with me! Send an email to gnupg-users-requ...@gnupg.org?subject=unsubscribe if you're not interested in emails from this mailing

Re: En-/Decryption speed for large files (GnuPG and Gpg4win)

uld be really nice to know how > long GnuPG and Gpg4win are busy with such large files. I think my largest tests were around 40GB. But I don't have the numbers anymore, the testing I did there was mostly because there were reports that Kleopatra crashes on such large files. Maybe you can open a

Re: En-/Decryption speed for large files (GnuPG and Gpg4win)

Thanks a lot for your reply Andre! On 17.01.23 13:08, Andre Heinecke wrote: Another big difference what you will see in the perfomance of GnuPG is if you use -z 0 which disables compression. I tried that with the 10GB file and, indeed, it was much faster. The encryption took only 51 seconds

switching off compression (was: En-/Decryption speed for large files (GnuPG and Gpg4win))

Am Dienstag 17 Januar 2023 13:08:18 schrieb Andre Heinecke via Gnupg-users: > Another big difference what you will see in the perfomance of GnuPG is if > you use -z 0 which disables compression. According to the GnuPG documentation (2.4.0)

Re: En-/Decryption speed for large files (GnuPG and Gpg4win)

lso try to en-/decrypt larger files? Maybe even > files that are larger than 1 TB? It would be really nice to know how > long GnuPG and Gpg4win are busy with such large files. I think my largest tests were around 40GB. But I don't have the numbers anymore, the testing I did there was mostly b

Re: En-/Decryption speed for large files (GnuPG and Gpg4win)

On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 16:47, Christoph Klassen said: > For some reason in that test gpg didn't output anything or at least > the PowerShell didn't show anything. Powershell and stdout and stderr are a bit problematic. I can't remember the details so I usually stick to cmd.exe or run tools

Re: En-/Decryption speed for large files (GnuPG and Gpg4win)

didn't show anything. On 15.01.23 17:03, Werner Koch wrote: > BTW, Do not use gpg4win 4.0.3 - it has a known vulnerability. Use > gpg4win 4.1.0. This will also change the numbers because we improved > some things in gpg. Don't worry, the system is mostly offline ;-) When I will give

RE: En-/Decryption speed for large files (GnuPG and Gpg4win)

On Monday, January 16, 2023 9:02 AM, ángel wrote: > On 2023-01-15 at 23:14 +0800, Ming Kuang via Gnupg-users wrote: > > On Sunday, January 15, 2023 5:52 PM, Christoph Klassen wrote: > > > When I was testing the decryption I also tried "gpg --decrypt > > > test_file.gpg" (without output file) with

Re: En-/Decryption speed for large files (GnuPG and Gpg4win)

ed to create an output file. Because you sent the output the the console. This is of course slow. BTW, Do not use gpg4win 4.0.3 - it has a known vulnerability. Use gpg4win 4.1.0. This will also change the numbers because we improved some things in gpg. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- The pione

Re: En-/Decryption speed for large files (GnuPG and Gpg4win)

On 2023-01-15 at 23:14 +0800, Ming Kuang via Gnupg-users wrote: > On Sunday, January 15, 2023 5:52 PM, Christoph Klassen wrote: > > When I was testing the decryption I also tried "gpg --decrypt > > test_file.gpg" (without output file) with the 10 GB file and it took 8 > > minutes and 47 seconds. I

RE: En-/Decryption speed for large files (GnuPG and Gpg4win)

On Sunday, January 15, 2023 5:52 PM, Christoph Klassen wrote: > When I was testing the decryption I also tried "gpg --decrypt > test_file.gpg" (without output file) with the 10 GB file and it took 8 > minutes and 47 seconds. I was wondering why it took longer when GnuPG > didn't need to create an

En-/Decryption speed for large files (GnuPG and Gpg4win)

Hello, I was testing the encryption and decryption with "pure" GnuPG and Gpg4win to compare the speed of them. What I also wanted to find out it how long it takes to en-/decrypt larger files. Some details of the environment for the test: * Windows 10 * Gpg4win 4.0.3 * CPU: Int

Re: Outlook addon for gpg4win

On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 17:19, mortimer.hob...@gmail.com said: > Is it possible to install the GpG3Win addon for Outlook without > re-installing the whole Gpg4Win system? You need to update the entire Gpg4win. For security reasons you should do this asap. Salam-Shalom,

Outlook addon for gpg4win

Is it possible to install the GpG3Win addon for Outlook without re-installing the whole Gpg4Win system? -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. www.avg.com ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org https

Re: Unable to make GPG4Win 4.x portable

Hello Karel, On 12/3/22 17:34, Karel van Gruiten via Gnupg-users wrote: Unfortunately my mail to gpg4win-users...@wald.intevation.org was bounced, so I am trying to ask for help here: I recently finally switched from the old 3.x series of GPG4Win to 4.0.4 doing a clean install which

Re: Unable to make GPG4Win 4.x portable

Hello Karel, Am Samstag 03 Dezember 2022 17:34:44 schrieb Karel van Gruiten via Gnupg-users: > Unfortunately my mail to gpg4win-users...@wald.intevation.org was bounced, (I'd be interested in this offlist, can you send me the bounce message to see if this is a problem with our infrastruct

Unable to make GPG4Win 4.x portable

Hello! Unfortunately my mail to gpg4win-users...@wald.intevation.org was bounced, so I am trying to ask for help here: I recently finally switched from the old 3.x series of GPG4Win to 4.0.4 doing a clean install which is working properly. ButI am unable to create a portable installation from

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

-- Original Message -- From: "Werner Koch via Gnupg-users" To: Sent: 11.01.2022 11:52:00 Subject: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue For details please see https://dev.gnupg.org/T5639 which was fixed with GnuPG 2.2.32 and 2.3.4. Hello, I'd say the problem is not fixed in neither Gn

Upgrading Gpg4win

Recently wanted to upgrade to the latest Gpg version on Windows 10 using installer,  and now is receiving an error in cmd "c:\>gpg -H gpg: Fatal: libgcrypt is too old (need 1.9.1, have 1.8.8)" Being more of a novices at this, how might I solve this issue, as I want to get into using this more

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 15:33, Anze Jensterle said: > checked multiple times). Only deleting the old intermediates instead of the > root helped. Do you also check all the intermediate paths? Sure. My former answer was simply wrong. For details please see https://dev.gnupg.org/T5639 which was fixed

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

Am Mittwoch 05 Januar 2022 09:16:52 schrieb Alex Nadtoka via Gnupg-users: > Is there a way to enable more detailed debug mode so I can see the path for > the certificate that dirmngr is using? Use dirmngr.conf to add more diagnostic output, e.g. log-file c:\XYZ debug-level advanced and

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

term=link> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> чт, 6 січ. 2022 р. о 10:32 Werner Koch пише: > Hi! > > instead of working around the problem, I strongly suggest to update > gpg4win to 4.0 or at least install gnupg 2.2.33 on top of an older > gpg4win. This fixes th

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

That's the weird thing: I had the new root installed all this time (I checked multiple times). Only deleting the old intermediates instead of the root helped. Do you also check all the intermediate paths? So the path to verify was SERVER->INTERMEDIATE(R3 signed by DST Root)->DST ROOT, both the

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 12:02, Anze Jensterle said: > Any idea why? I suspect it has to do with old intermediates being > crosssigned as well. If you don't have the current LE root certificate the old certification path is tried. Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

Hi Werner, This was happening to me on the latest 2.3.4 with gpg4win 4. Any idea why? I suspect it has to do with old intermediates being crosssigned as well. Best, Anze On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 at 09:41 Werner Koch via Gnupg-users < gnupg-users@gnupg.org> wrote: > Hi! > > instead of

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

Hi! instead of working around the problem, I strongly suggest to update gpg4win to 4.0 or at least install gnupg 2.2.33 on top of an older gpg4win. This fixes the problem without a need to tweak the root cert store. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

Ok for me the fix was by importing this intermediate certificate to intermediates in user profile and local computer https://letsencrypt.org/certs/lets-encrypt-r3.pem I guess old r3 should be removed and new one added Regards, Oleksandr ср, 5 січ. 2022 р. о 10:16 Alex Nadtoka пише: > I found

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

I found one such certificate and removed it but the issue is still there. Is there a way to enable more detailed debug mode so I can see the path for the certificate that dirmngr is using? Regards, Oleksandr ср, 5 січ. 2022 р. о 02:44 Anze Jensterle пише: > OK, I seem to have solved the issue.

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

OK, I seem to have solved the issue. @Alex Nadtoka Deleting the DST Root is not needed. Make sure to delete the certificate name "Let's Encrypt X1" or similar and "R3" from the user and system store. They are not stored under "Trusted Roots" but under "Intermediate CAs". After I deleted all the

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

I am having the same issue on GnuPG version 2.3.4. If I have the DST root in my Trust Root Store I get Certificate expired, if I don't have it in there I get "No inquire callback in IPC" and Dirmngr logs "error connecting to 'https://keys.openpgp.org:443': Missing issuer certificate". Any idea why

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

I do have isntalled ISRG Root X1 and X2 But I noticed that DST Root CA X3 appeared again in the system... weird. deleted it with admin privileges from entire PC вт, 4 січ. 2022 р. о 15:14 Andrew Gallagher via Gnupg-users < gnupg-users@gnupg.org> пише: > > On 4 Jan 2022, at 12:15, Alex Nadtoka

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

> On 4 Jan 2022, at 12:15, Alex Nadtoka wrote: > > yes thanks, tried disabling it but error was still there. So I deleted DST > Root CA X3 . At the mooment I see error from dirmngr 2.3.4: no CA certificate > found > And > error searching keyserver: "No inquire callback in IPC" > > Not

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

yes thanks, tried disabling it but error was still there. So I deleted DST Root CA X3 . At the mooment I see error from dirmngr 2.3.4: no CA certificate found And error searching keyserver: "No inquire callback in IPC" Not sure if it is still because of root certificate. Will try to google now

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

On Fri, 2021-12-31 at 23:23 +0200, Alex Nadtoka wrote: > Ok, thanks. Where on the client end i can remove it? This blog appears to do it correctly (to the best of my knowledge) and as its worked example uses the very same CA certificate that we have just been discussing:  

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

Ok, thanks. Where on the client end i can remove it? чт, 30 дек. 2021 г., 23:12 Andrew Gallagher via Gnupg-users < gnupg-users@gnupg.org>: > > > On 30 Dec 2021, at 16:27, Alex Nadtoka wrote: > > > > Even if I remove root certificate from the server it will be added again > on renewal. > > It is

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

> On 30 Dec 2021, at 16:27, Alex Nadtoka wrote: > > Even if I remove root certificate from the server it will be added again on > renewal. It is the client that needs the ca certificate to be removed, not the server. The root cause is that there is more than one verification path possible

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

again on renewal. Well again, I have latest gpg4win with latest gnupg and cannot connect to ANY keyserver that uses lets encrypt. BUT I can without any issues connect to my keyserver via GPG Suite for Mac OS, simple command line gpg client on my Ubuntu and CentOS servers. May be the issue

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

Cool thanks. going to test it today Yesterday tested also with GPG Suite on MacOS - works fine, so only windows issue I think. чт, 30 груд. 2021 р. о 16:31 Werner Koch via Gnupg-users < gnupg-users@gnupg.org> пише: > On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 21:33, Andrew Gallagher said: > > > OK, so you definitely

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 21:33, Andrew Gallagher said: > OK, so you definitely need to solve the root certificate issue. This has been fixed with gnupg 2.2.32 - please get an update. The workaround is to delete the old LE certificate from your Root CA store. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

It is just dirmngr Through browsers everything works fine as well as from gpg command line client in Linux ср, 29 груд. 2021 р. о 23:34 Andrew Gallagher via Gnupg-users < gnupg-users@gnupg.org> пише: > > > On 29 Dec 2021, at 21:12, Alex Nadtoka wrote: > > > > We have our internal GPG

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

> On 29 Dec 2021, at 21:12, Alex Nadtoka wrote: > > We have our internal GPG server( I want people in company to be able to > connect to it from windows as well... OK, so you definitely need to solve the root certificate issue. Do sites using letsencrypt work from an Edge browser on that

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

We have our internal GPG server( I want people in company to be able to connect to it from windows as well... ср, 29 груд. 2021 р. о 23:11 Andrew Gallagher via Gnupg-users < gnupg-users@gnupg.org> пише: > > On 29 Dec 2021, at 20:15, Alex Nadtoka wrote: > > yes it works with

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

> On 29 Dec 2021, at 20:15, Alex Nadtoka wrote: > > yes it works with keyserver-01.2ndquadrant.com Is this server sufficient for your purposes or do you also need to support an internal keyserver? A > ср, 29 груд. 2021 р. о 17:06 Andrew Gallagher via Gnupg-users > пише: >> On Wed,

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

yes it works with keyserver-01.2ndquadrant.com ср, 29 груд. 2021 р. о 17:06 Andrew Gallagher via Gnupg-users < gnupg-users@gnupg.org> пише: > On Wed, 2021-12-29 at 14:33 +0200, Alex Nadtoka via Gnupg-users wrote: > > I cannot connect to any keyserver. The error is certificate expired. > > I am

Re: Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

On Wed, 2021-12-29 at 14:33 +0200, Alex Nadtoka via Gnupg-users wrote: > I cannot connect to any keyserver. The error is certificate expired. > I am on latest (I think) Windows 10 . Tried reinstalling it or > installing on new Windows machine but no luck . dirmngr keeps telling > me that

Gpg4win LetsEncrypt issue

I cannot connect to any keyserver. The error is certificate expired. I am on latest (I think) Windows 10 . Tried reinstalling it or installing on new Windows machine but no luck . dirmngr keeps telling me that certificate is expired. I know I can put ignore-cert followed by the SHA-1 fingerprint

Re: issue with gpg4win

I am having a similar issue on my Windows 11 system (upgraded from Windows 10). I've tried with no luck - adding the 2 root CAs and the intermediate CA from the referenced article - deleted the expired DST Root CA X3 - rebooted my system Regards, *Ken* *Kenneth H. Lee,

Re: issue with gpg4win

I forgot to mention that I installed gpg4win 4.0.0 which has gpg 2.3.4 Regards, *Ken* *Kenneth H. Lee, CISSP*Google Voice: +1 646 883 9195 KHL at KENHLEE dot COM On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 2:36 PM Kenneth H. Lee wrote: > I am having a similar issue on my Windows 11 system (upgraded f

Re: issue with gpg4win

> On 25 Dec 2021, at 11:24, Alex Nadtoka wrote: > >  > Hi Andrew, yes I have changed the real name of my mailbox and the server) > Thanks for the reply. > My Client Machine is Windows . If you can tell me how to do that I would > appreciate it. Thanks again for the update) > Finally got

Re: issue with gpg4win

Hi Andrew, yes I have changed the real name of my mailbox and the server) Thanks for the reply. My Client Machine is Windows . If you can tell me how to do that I would appreciate it. Thanks again for the update) Finally got some help. Sorry for all these troubles and Merry Christmas Regards,

Re: issue with gpg4win

> 2021-12-23 11:27:30 gpg[12864] DBG: connection to the dirmngr established > 2021-12-23 11:27:30 gpg[12864] DBG: chan_0x025c -> GETINFO version > 2021-12-23 11:27:30 gpg[12864] DBG: chan_0x025c <- D 2.3.4 > 2021-12-23 11:27:30 gpg[12864] DBG: chan_0x025c <- OK > 2021-12-23 11:27:30

Re: issue with gpg4win

On Thu, 2021-12-23 at 12:37 +0200, Alex Nadtoka via Gnupg-users wrote: > 2021-12-23 11:27:30 gpg[12864] DBG: chan_0x025c -> KEYSERVER -- > clear hkps://gpg.example.com/ This doesn't look like a real keyserver. Did you redact this, or is this really what is currently configured in

issue with gpg4win

> > I cannot connect to any keyserver. The error is certificate expired. Here > is Debug log. I am on latest (I think) Windows 10 2021-12-23 11:27:15 gpg[17680] using character set 'utf-8' 2021-12-23 11:27:15 gpg[17680] Note: RFC4880bis features are enabled. 2021-12-23 11:27:15 gpg[17680]

Re: Why are 64-bit libraries not included in GnuPG but Gpg4win?

my keys as much as possible than the email client. yes, it would be cool to give that as a wish to Thunderbird to develop a full GnuPG based backend for that purposes for the people that have that use case and install Gpg4win anyway. (I think adding another experimental layer in between will not be th

Re: Why are 64-bit libraries not included in GnuPG but Gpg4win?

> On 4 Dec 2021, at 04:14, Sven Richter via Gnupg-users > wrote: > > Thunderbird expects to be able to manage all public keys regardless. Even > with this setup of mine, it only pulls the private keys from GnuPG. You may be interested in the Sequoia Octopus, which is a drop in replacement

Re: Why are 64-bit libraries not included in GnuPG but Gpg4win?

change my setup. I far rather have GnuPG manage my keys as much as possible than the email client. I kind of already guessed that maybe most people would use Gpg4win. But the installer for GnuPG is there and I'm sure some other people will use that as well. Since I've set everything up, it works

Re: Why are 64-bit libraries not included in GnuPG but Gpg4win?

Hi Sven, Am Donnerstag 02 Dezember 2021 10:06:11 schrieb Bernhard Reiter: > > It's not like they don't > > exist at all but they are part of Gpg4win only. was in contact with Werner (for other reasons) yesterday, he may still write something about this, but what I think now

Re: Why are 64-bit libraries not included in GnuPG but Gpg4win?

ed out by some participants.) > It's not like they don't > exist at all but they are part of Gpg4win only. Shouldn't they be included > directly in the core part? Why are they "moved out" to Gpg4win? It seems > weird to me that I would have to install gpg4win just to get hol

Why are 64-bit libraries not included in GnuPG but Gpg4win?

As the title states, why are there no 64-bit libraries in GnuPG for Windows? (The installer from the binary releases) It's not like they don't exist at all but they are part of Gpg4win only. Shouldn't they be included directly in the core part? Why are they "moved out" to Gpg4win

Re: GPG4Win 3.1.16: mkportable.exe missing?

Hello! I did a complete uninstall of GPG4Win with exception of the personal data in my homedir, restarted my machine and installed GPG4Win with all options selected (usually I install it without GPG-OL). Once again mkportable.exe and paperkey.exe were missing though the rest of my GPG4win

Re: GPG4Win 3.1.16: mkportable.exe missing?

Hello Karel, Am Samstag, 3. Juli 2021, 22:29:15 CEST schrieb karel-v_g--- via Gnupg-users: > After Updating from GPG4Win 3.1.15 to .16 I noticed that the newest build > does not install mkportable.exe?! Is it missing by intend or by accident? as far as I know mkportable works in pri

GPG4Win 3.1.16: mkportable.exe missing?

Hello! After Updating from GPG4Win 3.1.15 to .16 I noticed that the newest build does not install mkportable.exe?! Is it missing by intend or by accident? How can I make the latest build portable? Thanks for help! Karel PS: I hope it is okay to ask this GPG4Win-related question here on the GnuPG

Re: BSI - Why PQC for Thunderbird and not gpg4win in the first place?

Bernhard Reiter wrote: To be more specific, the conservatice party block (CDU/CSU) in Germany has been pushing many years for more suveillance, more rights for secret services and attack capabilities. And the resistance from other parties like SPD, FDP, attornies, journalists has been

Re: BSI - Why PQC for Thunderbird and not gpg4win in the first place?

d not for the > >> promoted gpg4win, The tender includes implementing the algorithms in libgcrypt as well, so Gpg4win will also get it. When trying to understand how public administration and governments work, it is helpful to think of them as several groups and people. So it is not som

Re: BSI - Why PQC for Thunderbird and not gpg4win in the first place?

Werner Koch wrote: On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 15:31, Стефан Васильев said: I don't understand why the BSI is looking for Post Quantum Cryptography support with OpenPGP for Thunderbird and not for the promoted gpg4win, I can't tell you that. I do not have anymore information than you. From

Re: BSI - Why PQC for Thunderbird and not gpg4win in the first place?

On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 15:31, Стефан Васильев said: > I don't understand why the BSI is looking for Post Quantum Cryptography > support with OpenPGP for Thunderbird and not for the promoted gpg4win, I can't tell you that. I do not have anymore information than you. From reading the

BSI - Why PQC for Thunderbird and not gpg4win in the first place?

Hello Werner and all, I don't understand why the BSI is looking for Post Quantum Cryptography support with OpenPGP for Thunderbird and not for the promoted gpg4win, in the first place? Text in German language: https://www.evergabe-online.de/tenderdetails.html?5=397181 As understood, Germany

Gpg4win/RunAsUser: (Is:After upgrading to gpg4win 3.3.15 Kleopatra fails to come up)

Am Montag 19 April 2021 23:49:56 schrieb Shridhar Mysore via Gnupg-users: > <<<< > Kleopatra cannot be run as adminstrator without breaking file permissions > in the GnuPG data folder. (For completeness here in the ML) https://wiki.gnupg.org/Gpg4win/RunA

After upgrading to gpg4win 3.3.15 Kleopatra fails to come up

Hello, I have an existing gpg4win 3.1.14 install which I want to upgrade to gpg4win 3.1.15. I tried to install gpg4win 3.1.15 over the existing gpgwin 3.1.14. The installation completed successfully and [GnuPG] and [Gpg4Win] folders reflected the expected versions as shown below : gnupg 2.2.27

Re: How to set up GPG4win to run from local system account?

DHARAV PATEL via Gnupg-users writes: > I have installed gpg4win on windows server. I have admin rights and > when i installed, i run exe as administrator. > Being a new bee, i am not able to understand the workflow of the > GPG4WIN and its set up. The best place start with is /The

GPGME-JSON to bundle with GnuPG (not Gpg4win) installer? (Or standalone installer)

Hi all, I've been using GnuPG for a while now, but I'm not able to use GnuPG with Mailvelope, since Mailvelope requires GPGME-JSON, which is not bundled with minimal GnuPG installer . (I strictly use GnuPG via command line, so I

Re: [gpg4win-3.1.7] Automated importing of public keys

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi On Monday 3 June 2019 at 5:03:56 PM, in , emordin via Gnupg-users wrote:- > Is this a feature of GnuPG on all > OS's > (Linux,etc) or is this only a feature on Windows? I have not used those specific front-end programs with GnuPG, but the

Re: [gpg4win-3.1.7] Automated Import of Public Key between programs

Please don't send HTML email to this list. > manager of keys), and GpgEX (GnupG extension for Windows Explorer)... My > question is when i use programs like Enigmail or the Mailvelop browser > plugin, my public keys get automatically imported to those programs. Enigmail doesn't. Enigmail uses

Re: Ideas on raising donations for GnuPG, Gpg4win, and g10 code

On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 1:50 AM Dan Bryant wrote: > > I was on Amazon Smile today and noticed quite a few FOSS projects were > available to select as the source of my amazon shopping proceeds. > Also thought that registering gnupg.org, gpg4win.org and g10code.com > in the Brave Rewards program

Ideas on raising donations for GnuPG, Gpg4win, and g10 code

I was on Amazon Smile today and noticed quite a few FOSS projects were available to select as the source of my amazon shopping proceeds. Also thought that registering gnupg.org, gpg4win.org and g10code.com in the Brave Rewards program might be an interesting way to allow GnuPG to accept small

Re: PGP Authentication with gpg4win+ssh

On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 15:13, zer...@gmail.com said: > If I do a gpg --list-keys my keys all show up just fine. Run gpg-connect-agent 'keyinfo --ssl-list' /bye to see the keys gpg-agent is aware of. See also gpg-connect-agent 'help keyinfo' /bye and as Gniibe wrote, you need to put a key

Re: PGP Authentication with gpg4win+ssh

authentication between them but not in Windows. PuTTY shows no keys > > available in the agent and thus my login is rejected. > > > > Is there some setting I'm missing or does gpg4win only support PGP > > authentication with SSH via a smart card? > > Your authentic

Re: PGP Authentication with gpg4win+ssh

t in Windows. PuTTY shows no keys > available in the agent and thus my login is rejected. > > Is there some setting I'm missing or does gpg4win only support PGP > authentication with SSH via a smart card? Your authentication subkey should be listed in .gnupg/sshcontrol, while it is

Re: PGP Authentication with gpg4win+ssh

Hi Chris! Am 2018-10-27 06:03, schrieb Chris Horry: > I'm trying to get this to work with gpg4win. I have a Yubikey with a PGP key > stored and it works just fine. I connect with PuTTY, it connects to the GPG > agent and it pops up asking for my Yubikey PIN and away I go. > >

PGP Authentication with gpg4win+ssh

Hello All, I'm trying to get this to work with gpg4win. I have a Yubikey with a PGP key stored and it works just fine. I connect with PuTTY, it connects to the GPG agent and it pops up asking for my Yubikey PIN and away I go. My config looks like this: Linux side: authorized_keys file has

Re: Access denied when using gpg4win via command prompt

Hello, Just wanted to update the status of my issue. It turns out there was an issue with my gpg4win installation. Tried a reinstall and everything's back in order. I could create a revocation certificate via cmd, however, this time to a local directory and not the windows dir. The 'access

Fw: Access denied when using gpg4win via command prompt

- Forwarded Message - From: S <sbdisn-...@yahoo.com> To: Kristian Fiskerstrand <kristian.fiskerstr...@sumptuouscapital.com> Sent: Wednesday, 5 July 2017 6:28 PM Subject: Re: Access denied when using gpg4win via command prompt @Kristian Fiskerstrand: Yes,

Re: Access denied when using gpg4win via command prompt

On 07/04/2017 03:22 PM, S via Gnupg-users wrote: > My OS : Windows 10 (1607 version)Gpg4win version : 2.33 > Any help's appreciated. > Thanks > You seem to try to output the revocation certificate to c:\windows\system32 , does the error persist if not outputting to a syst

Access denied when using gpg4win via command prompt

haven't made any changes to the system or the Gpg4win installation. Now none of the other tasks viz. import key, verification commands work either. As a workaround, I did try setting the 'smart screen filtering' to off in the settings along with enabling the developer mode but it still doesn't work

RE: GPG4Win Advice

] Sent: 11 June 2017 20:53 To: Ian A Morris; gnupg-users@gnupg.org Cc: Ian A Morris Subject: Re: GPG4Win Advice On 08/06/17 16:39, Ian A Morris wrote: > When using the GUI there are options for the following, “Remove > unencrypted original file when don” This is an extra convenience

Re: GPG4Win Advice

On 08/06/17 16:39, Ian A Morris wrote: > When using the GUI there are options for the following, “Remove > unencrypted original file when don” This is an extra convenience added by the GUI program. It is not in the command line interface. > Gpg2 –batch –recipient /x / –encrypt-files –armor

Re: GPG4Win Advice

ce files in a folder based on a Fileserver. > > GPG4Win (based on our SFTP Server) is scheduled to check the folder, > encrypt any files it finds placing the encrypted file on the SFTP > server’s Outbound folder and DELETING the original file on the Fileserver. > > I am able to automate the e

GPG4Win Advice

the process as follows. Users place files in a folder based on a Fileserver. GPG4Win (based on our SFTP Server) is scheduled to check the folder, encrypt any files it finds placing the encrypted file on the SFTP server's Outbound folder and DELETING the original file on the Fileserver. I am able

Re: gpg4win HKPS in gpg.conf correct slash

Hey Werner, thank you for your reply. So it works with both? It would be useful to write this in the gpg4win documentation. I could do this. Greetings Am 18.11.2016 8:27 AM schrieb "Werner Koch" <w...@gnupg.org>: On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:25, lukas.troebin...@gmail.com said: >

Re: gpg4win HKPS in gpg.conf correct slash

On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 20:25, lukas.troebin...@gmail.com said: > ca-cert-file=/path/to/CA/sks-keyservers.netCA.pem". In Windows, what is the > correct slash to use? > Is it / or \? Windows officially supports a forward slash in its core APIs but not in the shell. We do not use the shell and thus

gpg4win HKPS in gpg.conf correct slash

Hey, when using the sks keyserver you can choose to use the HKPS version. In the gpg.conf file you need to specify the path to the CA cert "keyserver-options ca-cert-file=/path/to/CA/sks-keyservers.netCA.pem". In Windows, what is the correct slash to use? Is it / or \? Thank you guys

Re: GnuPG vs. GPG4Win

On 2016-10-10 at 23:48, MFPA wrote: > I'm not sure what component in the package is a beta; GnuPG 2.1.15 > isn't and most of the version numbers match those in Gpg4win version > 2.3.3 (2016-08-18). > I think it's mostly the GpgOl and GpgEx parts of the bundle that are in beta, un

Re: GnuPG vs. GPG4Win

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sunday 9 October 2016 at 11:53:10 PM, in <mid:cacpwn9q5seer_hy5rykfadehxdmslvp4asysvng3+hc1uvn...@mail.gmail.com>, Schlacta, Christ wrote:- > What we need is whomever maintains > gpg4win to release a guide on how to hav

Re: GnuPG vs. GPG4Win

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Saturday 8 October 2016 at 1:46:19 PM, in , Rohit P wrote:- > Thanks. > I downloaded the second item from the link you provided. It has no > front-end and

Re: GnuPG vs. GPG4Win

6 3:54 PM To: Rohit P on GnuPG-Users Cc: Rohit P Subject: Re: GnuPG vs. GPG4Win -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Saturday 8 October 2016 at 8:02:00 AM, in <mid:maxpr01mb04127abd7bd6879c5ee2993197...@maxpr01mb0412.indprd01.prod.outlook.com>, Rohit P wrote:- > In

Re: GnuPG vs. GPG4Win

encrypt text on current window. Newer versions of GnuPG > has no such option. That would come from some frontend or Explorer plugin, not from GnuPG itself. > I am not understanding the difference between GnuPG and GPG4Win. > Are these one and the same thing? GPG4win is GnuPG 2.0.x

GnuPG vs. GPG4Win

In Older versions of GnuPG, a system tray icon used to appear with an option to encrypt text on current window. Newer versions of GnuPG has no such option. I am not understanding the difference between GnuPG and GPG4Win. Are these one and the same thing? Windows binary is not available

Re: gpg4win --gen-key fails to connect to IPC when using --homedir

-users/2012-April/044164.html > > but it doesn't seem to have been resolved. gpg4win was installed > using the default location, and with none of the add-ons (no > Outlook, shell, extensions, just gpg). The same operation without > --homedir works as expected. > > Any way to get this t

Re: Side-By-Side Installation: Gpg4win and gnuPG

Hi, On Sunday 10 July 2016 00:57:51 Kob S wrote: > Running C:\gnupg2.1.13\gpg --expert --full-gen-key > ... > I suspect that gnuPG is looking at the same \AppData\Roaming\gnupg > directory that is being used by gpg4win. If that is the case, is there a > way to for

Re: Side-By-Side Installation: Gpg4win and gnuPG

>To avoid that you should specify --homedir c:\testhome or something on the >commandline to 2.1 calls. Then it will use that as a different homedir. >e.g.: gpg --homedir c:\testhome --expert --full-gen-key This works now like a charm. Thanks, Rimma

  1   2   3   4   >