Erast Benson wrote:
I
don't think having packages with unmet depends in the unstable
repository is a bad thing. I think in the worst scenario we can simply
migrate known good packages to testing/stable and leave unmet packages
in unstable. Having the packages there helps to get people
BTW, 9300 packages imported now. 3700 missing...
On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 10:27 -0500, Tim Spriggs wrote:
I think we need to wait and see what happens when main is enabled for
builds before we can judge what will happen ultimately with depends.
Right. This make sense to fix prior to addressing
Erast Benson wrote:
BTW, 9300 packages imported now. 3700 missing...
Wahoo! The crap is comin' in with full force! Time to implement more
checks I suppose.
I wonder if we could utilize apt-get's ordering simulation, i.e. to
verify if package A is good do this in a script:
if apt-get
