On 25 Mar 2009, at 20:37, Gregory Casamento wrote:
I've updated the 1.0 Roadmap here:
http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Roadmap
I'm throwing this out for discussion to find out where everyone
thinks we stand on some of these goals and what should be added/
changed on this.
I support you
And one more thing...
Under packaging, you have:
• Package name, like GNUstep 1.0 for everything...
Since -base and -gui releases happen at the same time now, it would be
really great to synchronize their release numbers. Every time I'm
troubleshooting GNUstep problems, I end up wading
, March 26, 2009 6:03:39 AM
Subject: Re: Updated Roadmap
On 25 Mar 2009, at 20:37, Gregory Casamento wrote:
I've updated the 1.0 Roadmap here:
http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Roadmap
I'm throwing this out for discussion to find out where everyone thinks we
stand on some of these goals
Hi!
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:03:39AM +, Nicola Pero wrote:
I support you in your efforts to organize our roadmap ... but I would
rather have roadmaps for the separate packages
rather than a global GNUstep 1.0 roadmap. ;-)
Then why don't jump to version 2.0 directly?
Just my 2c. :)
I've updated the 1.0 Roadmap here:
http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Roadmap
I'm throwing this out for discussion to find out where everyone thinks we
stand on some of these goals and what should be added/changed on this.
Thanks, GC
--
Gregory Casamento
Open Logic Corporation, Principal
Am 25.03.2009 um 21:37 schrieb Gregory Casamento:
I've updated the 1.0 Roadmap here:
http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Roadmap
I'm throwing this out for discussion [...]
Is it still a good idea to keep applications like Mail.app or
Terminal.app with the development libraries/frameworks?
Currently Terminal is not distributed with GNUstep itself, it's in GAP.
Mail is also not in GNUstep. The only applications which are distributed
with GNUstep are:
Core applications:
* Gorm
* ProjectCenter
* DBModeller
* GWorkspace
* SystemPreferences
And a few examples:
* Ink
The first three
