[GOAL] what is a suitable CC license for an scholarly open access journal

://works.bepress.com/sridhar_gutam/ -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/attachments/20120426/6bb94c93/attachment.html

[GOAL] Re: what is a suitable CC license for an scholarly open access journal

-- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/attachments/20120426/63a84c4f/attachment.html

[GOAL] Re: what is a suitable CC license for an scholarly openaccess journal

://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/attachments/20120426/40642d48/attachment-0001.html

[GOAL] Re: what is a suitable CC license for an scholarly open access journal

1EW, UK +44-1223-763069 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/attachments/20120426/069a9b36/attachment.html

[GOAL] Re: what is a suitable CC license for an scholarly open access journal

. -- Peter Murray-Rust Reader in Molecular Informatics Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry University of Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK +44-1223-763069 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/attachments/20120426/808cb4ac

[GOAL] {Disarmed} RE: Re: what is a suitable CC license for an scholarly openaccess journal

University of Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK +44-1223-763069 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/attachments/20120426/780d5264/attachment-0001.html

[GOAL] eLife announces board of reviewing editors

Of interest to these lists ? another step toward the launch of this anticipated new OA journal. Sorry for the cross-posting! JM News release - April 26, 2012 eLife announces board of reviewing editors eLife, the new funder?researcher collaboration and forthcoming journal

[GOAL] Re: OA and NIH public access compliance and enforcement?

From: Wise, Alicia (ELS-OXF) A.Wise at elsevier.com I suspect compliance enforcement may not be such an issue for NIH because so many publishers deposit on behalf of their authors. It's one of the ways publishers have constructively engaged with the NIH on implementation of its open access

[GOAL] what is a suitable CC license for an scholarly open access journal

Dear All, In the year 2009, when we launched the Open Access Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants (OAJMAP) http://www.oajmap.in from Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Association of India (MAPAI) http://www.mapai.co.nr we have asked a question on a OA forum on what should be the suitable CC

[GOAL] Re: what is a suitable CC license for an scholarly open access journal

Dear Sridhar, CC-BY without a doubt. I share your views on the ND element. Almost all science is derived from earlier work. And ND would encumber, or make impossible, usage by modern scientific analyses, which are increasingly using – needing – text- and data-mining and then publishing those

[GOAL] Re: what is a suitable CC license for an scholarly open access journal

ND doesn't stop people building on the output;  but it does stop them amending it, so any reproduction must be of the text verbatim. Charles Professor Charles Oppenheim --- On Thu, 26/4/12, Sridhar Gutam gutam2...@gmail.com wrote: From: Sridhar Gutam gutam2...@gmail.com Subject:

[GOAL] Re: what is a suitable CC license for an scholarly openaccess journal

The problem with ND is that if you can’t break the content into its constituent parts, but can only reproduce the whole thing in its entirety verbatim, you really are very limited in what you can build. You can build collections. That’s it.  

[GOAL] Re: what is a suitable CC license for an scholarly open access journal

Dear Sridhar, I agree with you that CC BY ND license is quite restrictive and that CC BY is an optimal solution. Perhaps in your advice you can refer to: The Online Guide to Open Access Journals Publishing developed by Co-Action Publishing and Lund University Libraries Head Office with support

[GOAL] Re: what is a suitable CC license for an scholarly open access journal

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Iryna Kuchma iryna.kuc...@eifl.net wrote: Dear Sridhar, I agree with you that CC BY ND license is quite restrictive and that CC BY is an optimal solution. Perhaps in your advice you can refer to: There are very few Gold open access

[GOAL] Re: what is a suitable CC license for an scholarly open access journal

The Mounce list of OA publishing with copyright options and definitions is available at: https://sites.google.com/site/rossmounce/misc/a-survey-of-open-access-publisher -licenses     --- Charles Hamaker M.L.S |

[GOAL] {Disarmed} RE: Re: what is a suitable CC license for an scholarly openaccess journal

Thanks for the hat tip Peter!  Sridhar, here is my argument for why an open access should be fully open access – meaning CC BY.   http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001210   Best, Mike   Michael W. Carroll Professor of Law and Director, Program on