Maybe The little number of electronic journals come from The limitation to
first/principal editions, when electronic edition coul ne secondary.
Best regards,
Andrea Marchitelli
Il giorno 04/ago/2012 22:10, Stevan Harnad har...@ecs.soton.ac.uk ha
scritto:
Ulrichs' current correct estimate of the
The key to this is the ISSN-L which is a linking field in each ISSN record
that provides the equivalent of a family name for the print, electronic
and other formats of a serial.
Over the past 5 or more years the ISSN Network has worked hard to increase
the assignment of ISSNs for serials
Open Access Interview: New Testament Scholar Larry Hurtado
http://wp.me/p20y83-nw
It’s been a number of years since I’ve really immersed myself in direct
theological research--ever since my vocational path diverged from the start of
a doctoral program and took me, first into pastoral ministry
On 2012-08-05, Stella Dutton on LIBLICENSE wrote:
... insisting on 'green' open access before 'gold' can
be considered is at the very least like opening the parachute a split
second before hitting the ground. The only thing I would add is that
most publishers don't believe that they will be
I completely follow your argument Stevan, and agree with it, as far as it
goes. There is however an aspect that you have not covered, and you should
include it in your analysis.
You write as though reader-side subscriptions were the only alternative to
author-side publishing fees as a way of
Dear Arthur,
(1) For years and years I did not refer to toll-access as subscription
access but as subscription/license/pay-per-view (S/L/PPV). (Google the
AmSci Forum archives in the late 90's and early 2000's and I'll find
countless instances.) PPV is neither satisfactory for most users nor is
