Elsevier's (or at least Tom Reller's) response is as expected, though it does
show an apparent – mistaken IMO – belief in the idea that a 'final' manuscript
is inferior to the published version of an article. Much inferior, actually,
given that the published version purports to justify the
Thanks for posting this Donat,
I am curious as to how much the Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin is paying
Pensoft to publish these journals, and I would think others on the list
might be too. Unfortunately, when I asked Pensoft for the information I was
told that it was confidential. Since the data
Ultimately you might be right. But I see OA as a process to get open access to
our research results. It is even not clear what OA means in itself, nor whether
the way to it has to follow a certain path, beyond producing results or content
that is literally free, unrestricted and open access to
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Jan Velterop velte...@gmail.com wrote:
Elsevier's (or at least Tom Reller's) response is as expected, though it
does show an apparent – mistaken IMO – belief in the idea that a 'final'
manuscript is inferior to the published version of an article. Much
Link correction: http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/993-.html
(final l was missing from the URL)
On 2013-12-20, at 11:10 AM, Stevan Harnad amscifo...@gmail.com wrote:
The Green/Gold Distinction.The definition of Green and Gold OA is that Green
OA is provided by the author and
There are two separate issues here.
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Jan Velterop velte...@gmail.com wrote:
Elsevier's (or at least Tom Reller's) response is as expected, though it
does show an apparent – mistaken IMO – belief in the idea that a 'final'
manuscript is inferior to the published
These are all good points Stevan. Personally I dont mind what names people
use. My point was that if the costs associated with subsidising OA journals
were more transparent we might see more subscription journals flipped to OA.
It might also lead to a more competitive environment for publishing
ROARMAPUniversity Saint-Louis - Brussels http://roarmap.eprints.org/992/
University Saint-Louis - Brussels (20 Dec 2013)
INSTITUTION or FUNDER URL:
http://dial.academielouvain.be/vital/access/manager/Index?site_name=BOREAL
MANDATE URL and TEXT
Le Conseil de Recherche de l’Université Saint-Louis
One wonders if the dramatic decline, from 2001 to 2012, in both the number
published articles (692 --288) the subscription price ($12598 -- $5931)
had anything to do with Nuclear Physics B participating in SCOAP3?
Dana L. Roth
Caltech Library 1-32
1200 E. California Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91125
On 20 Dec 2013, at 18:12, Peter Murray-Rust pm...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
There are two separate issues here.
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Jan Velterop velte...@gmail.com wrote:
Elsevier's (or at least Tom Reller's) response is as expected, though it does
show an apparent – mistaken IMO –
Dear Stefan and Richard
The MfN case is a journal that is not really subsidized but originally
published also for exchange reasons between libraries, that is it has been used
to get publications from other libraries. Thus this did not involve costs for
purchasing subscriptions but could this
11 matches
Mail list logo
