, and it could in some cases
decrease open access.
Steve Hitchcock
WAIS Group, Building 32
School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Twitter: @stevehit
Connotea: http://www.connotea.org/user/stevehit
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 9379Fax: +44 (0
What does $99 buy in terms of publication? Do we know yet? Does it get you more
than putting the paper in a repository, for free?
The case for green is publish in your journal of choice, which could be a green
or gold journal, and make the paper open access in a repository. So you could
choose
The search graphic linked by Heather is interesting, as is the service
developed by Digital Commons. Unlike Stevan, I believe repository content
building and mandates will do better if developed in parallel with useful
repository services, and we should not forget that was the objective of OAI
The Jump THE article was revealing, as was the recent ACSS meeting on
Implementing Finch, judging from the reports from the DisorderofThings blog
(http://thedisorderofthings.com/2012/12/04/open-access-news-and-reflections-from-the-acss-conference/)
and the presentations that are beginning to
journals may not be there for them at all, to be replaced
with faceless collections like (name your publisher) OPEN.
Straws in the wind, or connected?
Steve Hitchcock
WAIS Group, Building 32
School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh
initially.
Are data papers, openly licenced, machine readable with data that can be
manipulated, the real target here, rather than the typical published paper
where the data may not have these features whether CC licenced or not?
Steve Hitchcock
DataPool Joint-Project Manager
WAIS Group, Building 32
Jan, What similarities with arXiv are you referring to? Arxiv allows an author
to attach specific CC licences (two are allowable); EPrints presents the author
with this option at deposit. But it is not mandated, and how commonly is this
option taken by authors, in arXiv or any other
, is it not?
Steve
Steve Hitchcock
WAIS Group, Building 32
School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Twitter: http://twitter.com/stevehit
Connotea: http://www.connotea.org/user/stevehit
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 9379Fax: +44 (0)23
definition above strategy in order to
railroad gold over green.
Any new case has to be based on strategy, and show clearly what we can expect
as a result - more or less open access (of the sort people can read for
themselves)?
Steve Hitchcock
WAIS Group, Building 32
School of Electronics
if, as
Keith suggests, the case for green is lost. While there is caution about
linking the two initiatives prematurely, they have to be seen as mutually
reinforcing. It's time to deploy every case for IRs that we can.
Steve Hitchcock
WAIS Group, Building 32
School of Electronics and Computer
control and
cost escalation.
We can agree that we don't want it to take 15 more years for open access to
become the norm.
Steve Hitchcock
WAIS Group, Building 32
School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh94r at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Twitter: http
to have it both ways without actually challenging the
system in any meaningful way.
-Mike
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Steve Hitchcock sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
A perspective spanning 20 years on this topic that fails to mention
repositories hardly begins to tackle the issues
' by switching from
subscriptions to author fees. This amounts, by his own calculation, to saying
that everyone should publish in PLoS One. That seems to me to be the most
partial view of all.
Steve Hitchcock
WAIS Group, Building 32
School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton
of Commons Science and Technology Committee Enquiry, Improving the
Commercialisation of Research - a response from the Publishers Association, 8
February 2012
http://www.publishers.org.uk/files/PA_response_to_Science_and_Technology_Committee_Inquiry_-_Commercialisation_of_Research.pdf
Steve
.
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee Enquiry, Improving the
Commercialisation of Research - a response from the Publishers Association, 8
February 2012
http://www.publishers.org.uk/files/PA_response_to_Science_and_Technology_Committee_Inquiry_-_Commercialisation_of_Research.pdf
Steve
, confidentiality, intellectual property)
have been considered and addressed.
Steve Hitchcock
WAIS Group, Building 32
School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh94r at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Twitter: http://twitter.com/stevehit
Connotea: http://www.connotea.org
, confidentiality, intellectual property)
have been considered and addressed.
Steve Hitchcock
WAIS Group, Building 32
School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Twitter: http://twitter.com/stevehit
Connotea: http://www.connotea.org
to
continuing that progress.
Steve Hitchcock
WAIS Group, Building 32
School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Twitter: http://twitter.com/stevehit
Connotea: http://www.connotea.org/user/stevehit
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 9379Fax: +44 (0)23
We must be grateful for Alan M. Garber's extensive and detailed submission for
Harvard to the White House RFI on OA to US federally funded research. There
appear to be counter moves. Garber refers to
Some publishers have gone to the
legislature, and backed the so-called Fair Copyright in
impact but the
number of users of these systems seems to be still too small for them to
challenge traditional citation indexes.
Steve
Steve Hitchcock
WAIS Group, Building 32
School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Twitter
about progress after 12 years of IRs (although to be fair, the
real acceleration in growth of IRs did not begin until some 5 years later). Do
we need another Santa Fe moment?
Steve Hitchcock
WAIS Group, Building 32
School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ
when it is offered
to us.
Steve Hitchcock
WAIS Group, Building 32
School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Twitter: http://twitter.com/stevehit
Connotea: http://www.connotea.org/user/stevehit
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 9379Fax
.
Steve Hitchcock
DepositMO Project Manager
IAM Group, Building 32
School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 7698Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 2865
http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/depositmo/
Twitter: http://twitter.com
, even though it is
investigating an entirely new and complementary approach.
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, Building 32
School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Twitter: http://twitter.com/stevehit
Connotea: http://www.connotea.org
on
software used, or - since repository interfaces are customisable - individual
or local repositories. There may be scope for the current JISC projects on
repository deposit, such as DepositMO, to look at this.
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, Building 32
School of Electronics and Computer Science
University
the case before that the issue between support for green and gold OA,
from an institutional perspective, is one of chronology, and it's the same for
IRs and preservation.
Steve Hitchcock
KeepIt Project Manager
IAM Group, Building 32
School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton
, many open access policies, particularly funder policies, are
predicated on the 'public good'. These perspectives should help frame our OA
debates. Progress has been made but the stakes are getting higher, for all of
us.
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, Building 32
School of Electronics and Computer
from a
dialogue with IRs on this issue. If the will is there, so are the solutions.
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, Building 32
School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 7698Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 2865
On 21 Feb
confused over publishing was Prof.
Beaudouin-Lafon in CACM
http://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2010/2/69353-open-access-to-scientific-publications/fulltext
We have to simplify OA for everyone else.
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, Building 32
School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton
will provide both cloud and repository support.
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 7698Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 2865
On 16 Jan 2010, at 19:02, Stevan Harnad wrote:
[Hyperlinked
strong advocacy. Focussing on the
former will lead to a clearer analysis of the motivations of
institutions and authors of target papers, to the services they
require, to more OA, and more likely to 100% OA.
The platform to do this is there and waiting.
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School
access publishing and
subscription publishing, thus providing open access without
precipitating an author crisis.
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 7698Fax: +44 (0)23
to benefit from the best practice
and experience, which is now widely documented, and they should seek it
out. Too often, I fear, they are distracted by the politics, and I
suspect Sally knows that.
Steve Hitchcock
KeepIt Project Manager
IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science
insight and summation, that brings
clarity, coherence and focus to our remaining OA challenges.
Steve
Steve Hitchcock
KeepIt Project Manager
IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 7698Fax: +44 (0
. --
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 7698 Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 2865
On 24/04/2009 03:08, Stevan Harnad wrote:
[apologies for cross-posting]
Comments on:
Open Access
in
reaching an accommodation on green OA, whereas gold OA is in
competition with TA publishers. That, I suspect, is the reason that
Michael, as an active proponent of gold OA, wishes to draw a clear
line that publishers such as Elsevier oppose OA when the reality is
not so clear.
Steve Hitchcock
for repositories, for them to be able to ignore it or
leave it to others. The technology and the scope for preservation
services is improving, but the business drivers are not there yet,
and in the end these will derive from policy and mandates, just as
the funder mandates recognise.
Steve Hitchcock
Preserv
by the unity and purpose of its
management, not its software, from those that sanction the vision and
policy, to those charged to ensure it happens. The rest is services
and can be outsourced. There are a few good examples of such IRs now,
but not many.
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics
Sending again as requested. - Steve
At 12:00 30/05/2008, Steve Hitchcock wrote:
A paper at the recent OR08 conference sheds further light on this:
Fitzgerald, B. and Austin, A. (2008) Issues for Academic Authors,
Institutional Repositories, Open Access Journals and End-Users
http
,
usually within a subject area, to be effective. The result is that
where such services are aimed at OA archives and IRs they are tending
to develop pragmatically as content levels improve and critical masses
emerge.
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science
University
. On these issues he challenges
his colleagues who err as much as anyone else, but always with the
same clear objective.
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 7698Fax: +44 (0)23 8059
and economic
computing infrastructure (large-scale, 'cloud' computing), (3) opens
up new services, e.g. preservation services, and (4) reduces
repository software lock-in.
So potentially a step change in interoperability for repositories.
Steve Hitchcock
Preserv Project Manager
IAM Group, School
*
repository.
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 7698Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 2865
is waking up to the good news, proclaimed
by RCUK, and that's a starting point with plenty of scope for publishers
to take their work on from there. Despite Anthony's and others'
forthcoming protestations, I think they already know that.
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer
is that there are no
up front costs to the publisher from the KB (see e.g.
https://arl.org/Lists/SPARC-OAForum/Message/1174.html).
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 3256Fax: +44 (0
perhaps claim to be the
exception, as a single archive offering content and dissemination services.
Certainly we expect to see subject-based discovery/dissemination services
predominate, e.g. RePEc, rather than subject-based 'dissemination' archives.
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics
in putting the
case straight, highlighting what has been achieved so far and outlining the
forward-looking agenda for OA archiving that now exists in the UK thanks in
part to the select cttee report.
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton
: Creating a Persistent Preservation Environment for
Institutional Repositories
Brief information on both can be found linked from
http://www.jisc.ac.uk/index.cfm?name=programme_404
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Email
effective. As a result my copy
of the offending mail had the attachment automatically deleted, the file
was labelled as spam and so was automatically trashed by my filter.
This way we can all spend more time reading the real list messages.
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics
and the provision of a
network infrastructure for preservation service providers.
All of these can be productively worked out as long as it is clear that
immediate OA content can continue to be provided. The parallel long-term
preservation efforts are another incentive for providing that content.
Steve
been funded for a second
year to widen support for usage in more subject areas.
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 3256 Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 2865
assessment tools = CRIS
http://wwwoud.eurocris.org/conferences/cris2004/abstracts/hitchcock.html
A slightly different interpretation.
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 3256
are the
endorsements for the UK recommendations?
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 3256 Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 2865
must be designed and managed as live services not as
passive back-up.
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 3256 Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 2865
[Moderator's note: Below are three postings, by:
(1) S. Hitchcock, (2) D. Goodman, (3) B. Quint]
(1) Steve Hitchcock:
I endorse the need to remove delays and for papers to be made open access
upon publication, or even earlier, either by self-archiving or by
publishing in gold journals
The Web page for this meeting now contains links to all presentations.
Links in the summary report below have also been updated.
http://opcit.eprints.org/feb19prog.html
Steve Hitchcock
At 13:13 22/02/04 +, Stevan Harnad wrote:
Here is a very brief summary of the contributions 22
in repositories - this report is worthwhile indeed.
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 3256 Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 2865
At 12:57 23/02/04 +, Mark Ware wrote:
PALS
We are pleased to announce the programme for the meeting
National Policies on Open Access (OA) Provision for University Research Output
http://opcit.eprints.org/feb19prog.html
another subjective term -
money available for institutional archiving, then perhaps it will be taken
more seriously by a wider group of people?
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23
/handle/1721.1/149
- Steve Hitchcock at al., The impact of OAI-based search on access to
research journal papers
http://opcit.eprints.org/serials-short/serials11.html
(due to a subbing error the published version contains an error in the
abstract; this version is correct)
- Elizabeth Gadd, IPR
archiving and
not just journal publishing. In the end it will be society as a whole
that will benefit from making the right strategic decisions based on
the fullest information.
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh
them luck at this week's meeting.
http://www.wsis-si.org/si-wg.html
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 3256 Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 2865
://digital.casalini.it/retreat/2003_docs/Cox.pdf
What is clear is that these questions cannot be answered unless proper
weight is given to author self-archiving in any open access scenario. I
look forward to the report's detailed findings on these issues.
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics
Westlaw or Lexis or Hein monopoly rents to get it.
Why blame the student? If the law professor doesn't get it, how can the
student be expected to?
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0
/self-archiving_files/Slide0021.gif
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Temp/self-archiving_files/Slide0022.gif
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Temp/self-archiving_files/Slide0028.gif
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Email
=enie=UTF-8
But the thrust of the bill towards publications is clear.
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 3256 Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 2865
William Nixon says the question most frequently asked of the DAEDALUS
project is 'Why are you using both EPrints and DSpace? His admirably
thorough and practical Ariadne article
DAEDALUS: Initial experiences with EPrints and DSpace at the
University of Glasgow
? If
the latter, how will the results be measured?
Will other institutional archives be offered the same terms for their authors?
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group, Department of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 3256
'universal' here, but only one of these - Handicap
access barriers - is within the remit of open access content producers.)
Some wish to go further, but surely these are the only terms that are
necessary in a definition of open access. Alone, free is insufficient.
Steve Hitchcock
IAM Group
to speculate on journal prices, but my guess is that some of
the market drivers that McCabe reveals would be affected and price pressure
could be reversed, most obviously by increased competition.
The result might have an interesting effect on decision-makers in
institutions, if not on authors.
Steve
on optimising the submitted metadata within the
OAI framework.
Steve Hitchcock
Open Citation (OpCit) Project http://opcit.eprints.org/
IAM Research Group, Department of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 3256
that have
been identified below. Certainly institutions must do more than Mark Doyle
wants, despite the good work APS is doing, which is for publishers to
'grant back to authors all of the rights they expect'. On this issue,
institutions must lead, not follow.
Steve Hitchcock
Open Citation (OpCit
more beneficial than 'do not cite'. Then readers are free to make their own
value judgements about validity for citing purposes, etc.
Steve Hitchcock
Open Citation (OpCit) Project http://opcit.eprints.org/
IAM Research Group, Department of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton
to surveys, and this
one had 473 respondents, so we should be able to learn more from the data
than we are allowed to here. At very least, I would urge the author to make
the raw data available online so it can be interpreted a little more
rigourously.
Steve Hitchcock
Open Citation (OpCit) Project
Much as I am flattered by Stevan's and Gerry's generous and unprompted
comments about Perspectives in Electronic Publishing, it should be pointed
out that PeP has not been updated - neither content nor links - since I
began writing the final sections of my thesis towards the end of last year.
As
/search/article.html?id=02091304
ooo
Adrian Smith
Faculty Team Librarian
Edward Boyle Library
University of Leeds LS2 9JT
+44 (0) 113 34 35531
Steve Hitchcock
Open Citation (OpCit) Project http://opcit.eprints.org/
IAM Research Group, Department of Electronics and Computer
any official notices of
this issue.
Steve Hitchcock
Open Citation (OpCit) Project http://opcit.eprints.org/
IAM Research Group, Department of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 3256 Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 2865
At 13:57 18/06/02 +0100, Stevan Harnad wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Steve Hitchcock wrote:
this is a PR issue. Since journalists always seem
to make this conflation, someone ought to address it.
The fundamental problem... is that the open access
message, as presented, is too complex and too
cannot
be achieved by all, it highlights the importance of separating the
essential costs of eprint archiving. Costs that are significantly higher
than this may be due to combining inessential functions, as far as eprint
archives are concerned.
Steve Hitchcock
Open Citation (OpCit) Project http
not, incursions into open access archives by commercial interests.
As to the rest of the speculation, it wasn't mine.
Steve Hitchcock
Open Citation (OpCit) Project http://opcit.eprints.org/
IAM Research Group, Department of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
their more enlightened colleagues.
Steve Hitchcock
Open Citation (OpCit) Project http://opcit.eprints.org/
IAM Research Group, Department of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 3256 Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 2865
things that may outlive the original
author's interest'.
FDL is not new, although a new version (FDL 1.2) is currently being
reviewed, but I must admit I wasn't aware of it before, and the preceding
contributions to this thread didn't mention it.
Steve Hitchcock
Open Citation (OpCit) Project http
papers. In both cases the emphasis is on peer review with much
scaled-down editorial processing.
I know you commented on this in your 'overlay' paper two years ago.
According to Fosmire and Yu (2000), ATMP is a bona fide high impact
journal. Has anything changed?
Steve Hitchcock
Open Citation
are as they are.
Steve Hitchcock
Open Citation (OpCit) Project http://opcit.eprints.org/
IAM Research Group, Department of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 3256 Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 2865
Barry Mahon
Linkages
http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/intprop/98_2burk/default.htm
Steve Hitchcock
Open Citation (OpCit) Project http://opcit.eprints.org/
IAM Research Group, Department of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059
. Publication is one of the
means. There are distractions, like the academic reward structure, which
viewed selfishly suggest the opposite, but ultimately if better research is
the goal then the means will take care of itself.
Steve Hitchcock
Open Citation (OpCit) Project http://opcit.eprints.org/
IAM
by comments to the
contrary.
Steve Hitchcock
Open Citation (OpCit) Project http://opcit.eprints.org/
IAM Research Group, Department of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)23 8059 3256 Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 2865
Jim, You are right, all statements to date on this seem to be
vague, professing support for OAi but not implementation yet. The key point
perhaps, especially as this is a preprint rather than an eprint archive, is
whether the journals, say those that accept papers from the CPS, are
Alan,For the benefit of authors who may have little knowledge
of different rights but have probably heard of copyright, can you explain
briefly what copyright is and why retaining it may be of little use to the
author, as you suggest, in this example? Most authors will probably assume
At 09:16 12/02/01 +, Stevan Harnad wrote:
Your interpretation is correct. DOI is proprietary, OAI is open.
See: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Tp/resolution.htm
In the context of the debate below there are a number of subtle
distinctions that might be worth making to avoid confusion.
because, not having
downloaded, installed and used OJWS myself, I'm not absolutely clear
how it works, and Eric Hellman of Openly usually has to correct me on
these matters. Interestingly, Openly is explicitly targetting the same
market as SFX with this.
Steve Hitchcock
in the future? And it looks like Albert
Henderson's diligence is providing the answers.
Steve Hitchcock
Open Citation (OpCit) Project http://opcit.eprints.org/
IAM Research Group, Department of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tel
germane to this thread.
If you are right then I believe that free universal access to
author-archived versions of their papers as a basis for evaluated
publication will significantly improve the quality of research.
Steve Hitchcock
Open Citation (OpCit) Project http://opcit.eprints.org/
IAM Research
documents, locking is not insurmountable but is
against the principle of what we are trying to demonstrate.
Steve Hitchcock
Open Citation (OpCit) Project http://opcit.eprints.org/
IAM Research Group, Department of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh
At 21:29 02/11/00 +, Stevan Harnad wrote:
Obviously I'm not a conservative offering rationales for inaction.
And my worry is not a priori. NCSTRL and MPRESS are two long-standing
attempts at standards-based fragmented interoperability. Neither one
has as much readership as the younger,
.
For different reasons, both the hybrid model and many online-only journals
are too reverential to the established journal model. Those who want
electronic journals to achieve (1)-(9), especially (9), have to be more
open to new models.
Steve Hitchcock
Open Citation (OpCit) Project http
free. The key to for-pay services is enhanced
access, and I'd like to hear the ideas of others on that.
Steve Hitchcock
Open Citation (OpCit) Project http://opcit.eprints.org/
IAM Research Group, Department of Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Email: sh
At 15:11 08/09/00 +0100, Chris Armstrong wrote:
Steve Hitchcock s.hitchc...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
misunderstanding implied in your comments. It has never
been the role of those who provide access to
information, librarians or publishers, to FIX
content, i.e. to select a particular version
the former is clearly impossible now, the latter is distinctly
realisable, and the comment by Pieter Bolman, a high ranking publisher, can
be taken to be an implicit recommendation of what the academic community
should be working towards: access is for free - no caveats there.
Steve Hitchcock
At 09:21 18/05/00 +0100, Thomas Krichel wrote:
Steve Hitchcock writes
Paul Ginsparg defined an eprint as something self-archived by the author.
Isn't that the clearest distinction, and an obvious one for this forum to
draw?
I tend to think of an eprint as a public-access scientific
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
