On 11 December 2013 20:13, Bosman, J.M. j.bos...@uu.nl wrote:
Let me be clear on this. My suggestion to move the discussion on peer
review to another list has nothing to do with agreeing or not agreeing with
anyone. It has to do with the degree to which peer review is related to
Open Access.
Open access and peer review reform are not necessarily related in that you
can have OA without peer review changes (e.g. PLOS Biology) and have peer
review changes without open access. However, in practical terms it makes
sense to discuss them both in the same place because they are both
inhibited
