On 18 December 2013 12:07, Andrew A. Adams a...@meiji.ac.jp wrote:
Graham,
There is still disagreement as to the exact scope of CC-NC license. For
example, a University which uses material in a MOOC for which it does not
charge any fees isclearly NC. However, what about if they offer
On 17 December 2013 22:38, Couture Marc marc.cout...@teluq.ca wrote:
I’m in the editorial board of an OA journal which uses -NC but doesn’t
ask authors to grant it a license, so the authors keep the exploitation
rights.
The problem with Elsevier is that they require (even for CC-BY) an
On 18 December 2013 06:41, Peter Murray-Rust pm...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
Not necessarily. It means that for any commercial use (and the CC
definition is subject to interpration), one has to obtain the permission of
the copyright owner, which may be the author, depending of the scope of the
license
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Graham Triggs grahamtri...@gmail.comwrote:
On 18 December 2013 06:41, Peter Murray-Rust
I agree with you about the other problems about funders and OA subset.
However, let's just step back a minute and think about the bigger picture.
An -NC licence does not
On 2013-12-18, at 3:42 AM, Graham Triggs
grahamtri...@gmail.commailto:grahamtri...@gmail.com wrote:
To re-iterate a previous discussion, an exclusive publishing license exists
between the author and the publisher, and can not limit anyone downstream with
what they can do according to the
Can you clarify regarding instances of CCC RightsLink demanding payments
for OA reuse? I'd really like to know details.
--
Laura Markstein Quilter / lquil...@lquilter.net
*Attorney, Geek, Militant Librarian, Teacher*
Copyright and Information Policy Librarian
] On Behalf Of
Laura Quilter
Sent: 17 December 2013 14:53
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Hybrid Open Access
Can you clarify regarding instances of CCC RightsLink demanding payments for OA
reuse? I'd really like to know details
)
*Subject:* [GOAL] Re: Hybrid Open Access
Can you clarify regarding instances of CCC RightsLink demanding payments
for OA reuse? I'd really like to know details.
--
Laura Markstein Quilter / lquil...@lquilter.net
*Attorney, Geek, Militant Librarian, Teacher
-BY articles NOT to contain a link to RightsLink.
Regards
Robert
*From:* goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] *On
Behalf Of *Laura Quilter
*Sent:* 17 December 2013 14:53
*To:* Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
*Subject:* [GOAL] Re: Hybrid Open Access
(Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Hybrid Open Access
Can you clarify regarding instances of CCC RightsLink demanding payments for OA
reuse? I'd really like to know details.
--
Laura Markstein Quilter / lquil...@lquilter.netmailto:lquil...@lquilter.net
Attorney, Geek
2013 16:04
À : Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Objet : [GOAL] Re: Hybrid Open Access
I flagged this up to Elsevier about 5 months ago.
I would agree that they could be in violation of trading laws as they are
asserting rights over free material and charging for it. I don't know
-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] *De la
part de* Peter Murray-Rust
*Envoyé :* 17 décembre 2013 16:04
*À :* Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
*Objet :* [GOAL] Re: Hybrid Open Access
I flagged this up to Elsevier about 5 months ago.
I would agree
12 matches
Mail list logo
