Sally,
May I join you in the ranks of those who risk being pilloried or branded
heretics? I think the solution is clear. We should get rid of pre-publication
peer review (PPPR) and publish results in open repositories. PPPR is the one
thing that keeps the whole publishing system standing, and
Each further day of thinking makes me feel closer and closer to this view. As
an author, I just like when colleagues are happy with one of my texts online.
As a reviewer I am fed up with unreadable junk.
Let us burn together, Jan.
Laurent
Le 10 déc. 2013 à 15:36, Jan Velterop
peer review (was: Jeffrey Beall
Needlessly Compromises Credibility of Beall's List)
Sally,
May I join you in the ranks of those who risk being pilloried or branded
heretics? I think the solution is clear. We should get rid of
pre-publication peer review (PPPR) and publish results in open
review (was: Jeffrey Beall Needlessly
Compromises Credibility of Beall's List)
Each further day of thinking makes me feel closer and closer to this view. As
an author, I just like when colleagues are happy with one of my texts online.
As a reviewer I am fed up with unreadable junk.
Let us burn
(was: Jeffrey Beall
Needlessly Compromises Credibility of Beall's List)
Sally,
May I join you in the ranks of those who risk being pilloried or branded
heretics? I think the solution is clear. We should get rid of
pre-publication peer review (PPPR) and publish results in open
repositories. PPPR
