My friend Henk Moed (whose work I admire and whose scientific
integrity I am in no way calling into question!) has replied to my
query:
Where on earth did Henk get the idea that some institutions'
self-archiving 'did not increase when their OA regime was transformed
from non-mandatory into
My friend Henk Moed (whose work I admire and whose scientific
integrity I am in no way calling into question!) has replied to my
query:
Where on earth did Henk get the idea that some institutions'
self-archiving 'did not increase when their OA regime was transformed
from non-mandatory into
...@eprints.org] On
Behalf Of Andrew A. Adams
Sent: 23 March 2012 09:08
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Tireless Ad Hoc Critiques of OA Study After OA
Study: Will Wishful Thinking Ever Cease?
Is it really common sense? You write: Not only is OA research
Dear Stevan,
Is it really common sense? You write: Not only is OA research downloaded and
cited more -- as common sense would expect, as a result of making it accessible
free for all, rather than just for those whose institutions can afford a
subscription.
First, downloaded more - I can
Dear Jan,
the citations to articles will not be hampered by accessibility.
You're kidding me right?
It's quite common to have points in a manuscript that need to be
supported by several references (X 2001; Y 2002; Z 2003). In these
instances, in my experience researchers use the most famous
Is it really common sense? You write: Not only is OA research
downloaded and cited more -- as common sense would expect, as a result
of making it accessible free for all, rather than just for those whose
institutions can afford a subscription.
First, downloaded more - I can agree. But
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Jan W. Schoones, Walaeus Library,
The Netherlands, wrote:
You write: Not only is OA research downloaded and cited more -- as common
sense would expect, as a result of making it accessible free for all, rather
than just for those whose institutions can
.
--
-Original Message-
From: goal-bounces at eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf
Of Stevan Harnad
Sent: 23 March 2012 09:14
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Tireless Ad Hoc Critiques of OA Study After OA
)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Tireless Ad Hoc Critiques of OA Study After OA Study: Will
Wishful Thinking Ever Cease?
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Jan W. Schoones, Walaeus Library, The
Netherlands, wrote:
You write: Not only is OA research downloaded and cited more -- as common
sense would expect
Dear Stevan,
Is it really common sense? You write: Not only is OA research downloaded and
cited more -- as common sense would expect, as a result of making it accessible
free for all, rather than just for those whose institutions can afford a
subscription.
First, downloaded more - I can
Dear Jan,
the citations to articles will not be hampered by accessibility.
You're kidding me right?
It's quite common to have points in a manuscript that need to be
supported by several references (X 2001; Y 2002; Z 2003). In these
instances, in my experience researchers use the most famous
11 matches
Mail list logo
