--- Santosh Helekar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gilbert appears to have now found refuge in name-calling, while going through
> some kind of
> twisting and turning to rationalize his statement of moral equivalence .
> It is hard
> to understand, as usual, what he is trying to say,
Gilbert
--- Gilbert Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is the reason why I find Goanet so hilarious.
> I have fallen of my chair laughing. This post
> exposed the hypocrisy and the pseudo-intellectuals.
>
Gilbert appears to have now found refuge in
name-calling, while going through some kind o
This is the reason why I find Goanet so hilarious. I have fallen of my chair
laughing. This post exposed the hypocrisy and the pseudo-intellectuals. The two
authors below gave their reasons for and against what I said. Few spouted off,
with some rationale which they only could understand.
Tha
> --- Jose Colaco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I see nothing wrong with the above quoted from
> > Gilbert >Lawrence.
> >
> > All he says (in effect) is that he (Gilbert
> > Lawrence) would IGNORE an atheist, as also
> > someone who smokes, divorced, lives a homosexual
> > life style or c
--- Jose Colaco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I see nothing wrong with the above quoted from
Gilbert >Lawrence.
>
> All he says (in effect) is that he (Gilbert
Lawrence) would IGNORE an
> atheist, as also someone who smokes, divorced, lives
a homosexual life style
> or cheats on his spouse.
>
Gilbert Lawrence wrote that HIS reaction to an atheist is "benign neglect".
It is no different as towards someone who smokes, divorced, lives a
homosexual life style or cheats on their spouse. What they do is their
problem.
= jc's response:
I see nothing wrong with the above quoted from G
