Re: [gobolinux-devel] New Freshen

2007-03-08 Thread Michael Homer
On 3/9/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/3/9, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Well, hopefully I've fixed all of those. It now uses GetAvailable.conf > > and Compile.conf for everything appropriate, and shouldn't throw the > > errors with Current. That said, though, if you

Re: [gobolinux-devel] New Freshen

2007-03-08 Thread Jonas Karlsson
2007/3/9, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Well, hopefully I've fixed all of those. It now uses GetAvailable.conf > and Compile.conf for everything appropriate, and shouldn't throw the > errors with Current. That said, though, if you don't have Current set > to your latest installed version you

Re: [gobolinux-devel] New Freshen

2007-03-08 Thread Michael Homer
Well, hopefully I've fixed all of those. It now uses GetAvailable.conf and Compile.conf for everything appropriate, and shouldn't throw the errors with Current. That said, though, if you don't have Current set to your latest installed version you'll run into trouble when something depends on that

[gobolinux-devel] Various (possible) bugs

2007-03-08 Thread Michael Homer
Hi, I've come across a few potential bugs while working on Freshen; some of them may just be the result of the abnormal installation I had, but I'd like to fix them even then. Several packages seem to be signed improperly or to have been changed since - KDE-PIM, GMP, KDE-Utils, Hdparm, File, and C

Re: [gobolinux-devel] New Freshen

2007-03-08 Thread Michael Homer
On 3/9/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/3/8, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 3/8/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 2007/3/8, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > On 3/8/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > 2007/3/7, Michael Ho

Re: [gobolinux-devel] udev rules from module-init-tools outdated?

2007-03-08 Thread Lucas C. Villa Real
On 3/8/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/8/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Where does 60-modprobe.rules originally come from? It isn't in the > > module-init-tools tarball.. Is it needed? > > I don't have any updated script. I guess we could just comment ou

Re: [gobolinux-devel] udev rules from module-init-tools outdated?

2007-03-08 Thread Carlo Calica
On 3/8/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And, one more issue... When I connect my MIDI USB interface before my > machine boots, the drivers and firmware isn't loaded. This is handled by > /P/Midisport-Firmware/Settings/udev/rules.d/42-midisport-firmware.rules > which works fine w

Re: [gobolinux-devel] udev rules from module-init-tools outdated?

2007-03-08 Thread Carlo Calica
On 3/8/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Where does 60-modprobe.rules originally come from? It isn't in the > module-init-tools tarball.. Is it needed? > I don't have any updated script. I guess we could just comment out that > line for now... > I'm probably responsible. It cam

Re: [gobolinux-devel] udev rules from module-init-tools outdated?

2007-03-08 Thread Lucas C. Villa Real
On 3/8/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't have the need for this type of fine grained security, but > there might be people who do. One question that does come to mind is: > is there a reason others have to have write access? Why not use 0664? > I think cdrecord group is a good

Re: [gobolinux-devel] udev rules from module-init-tools outdated?

2007-03-08 Thread Jonas Karlsson
2007/3/8, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 3/8/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Lucas C. Villa Real wrote: > > > On 3/8/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Works great. But I don't think "others" should be able to write to the > > >> cdrw, only u

[gobolinux-devel] Fwd: [Unionfs] [ANNOUNCE] 2.6.21-rc2 and 2.6.21-rc3 patches

2007-03-08 Thread Lucas C. Villa Real
For your information: -- Forwarded message -- From: Josef Sipek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mar 8, 2007 5:48 PM Subject: [Unionfs] [ANNOUNCE] 2.6.21-rc2 and 2.6.21-rc3 patches To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unionfs patches for 2.6.21-rc2 and -rc3 are available on the ftp server. They fix se

Re: [gobolinux-devel] udev rules from module-init-tools outdated?

2007-03-08 Thread Lucas C. Villa Real
On 3/8/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lucas C. Villa Real wrote: > > On 3/8/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Works great. But I don't think "others" should be able to write to the > >> cdrw, only users in 'cdrecord' group. So I suggest changing that to > >>

Re: [gobolinux-devel] udev rules from module-init-tools outdated?

2007-03-08 Thread Jonatan Liljedahl
Lucas C. Villa Real wrote: > On 3/8/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Works great. But I don't think "others" should be able to write to the >> cdrw, only users in 'cdrecord' group. So I suggest changing that to >> 0660... (what would otherwise be the point with 'cdrecord' owning

Re: [gobolinux-devel] udev rules from module-init-tools outdated?

2007-03-08 Thread Lucas C. Villa Real
On 3/8/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Works great. But I don't think "others" should be able to write to the > cdrw, only users in 'cdrecord' group. So I suggest changing that to > 0660... (what would otherwise be the point with 'cdrecord' owning Biggest problem with 0660 is th

Re: [gobolinux-devel] udev rules from module-init-tools outdated?

2007-03-08 Thread Jonatan Liljedahl
>> BTW, I have another problem with udev rules. My dvd writer (/dev/hda >> with links to dvd and cdrw) is owned by root.root, I'd like it to be >> root.cdrecord so that users in the cdrecord group can burn CD's... >> But the cdrecord group isn't even mentioned in any udev rules, but group >> "cdrw"

[gobolinux-devel] GoboLinux-Recipes-Commits

2007-03-08 Thread Lucas C. Villa Real
Hi, There's now a separate mailing list to log the activity in the recipes' subversion tree, so that no more flood is sent to the gobolinux-recipes list. For those interested in following their development and posting comments, here's the link for subscription and archives: http://lists.gobolinux

Re: [gobolinux-devel] udev rules from module-init-tools outdated?

2007-03-08 Thread Lucas C. Villa Real
On 3/8/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Lucas C. Villa Real wrote: > On 3/8/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Where does 60-modprobe.rules originally come from? It isn't in the >> module-init-tools tarball.. Is it needed? >> I don't have any updated script. I gue

Re: [gobolinux-devel] udev rules from module-init-tools outdated?

2007-03-08 Thread Jonatan Liljedahl
Lucas C. Villa Real wrote: > On 3/8/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Where does 60-modprobe.rules originally come from? It isn't in the >> module-init-tools tarball.. Is it needed? >> I don't have any updated script. I guess we could just comment out that >> line for now... > >

Re: [gobolinux-devel] New Freshen

2007-03-08 Thread Jonas Karlsson
2007/3/8, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 3/8/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2007/3/8, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On 3/8/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > 2007/3/7, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > I've finished

Re: [gobolinux-devel] udev rules from module-init-tools outdated?

2007-03-08 Thread Lucas C. Villa Real
On 3/8/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Where does 60-modprobe.rules originally come from? It isn't in the > module-init-tools tarball.. Is it needed? > I don't have any updated script. I guess we could just comment out that > line for now... It comes from the Module-Init-Tools r

Re: [gobolinux-devel] udev rules from module-init-tools outdated?

2007-03-08 Thread Jonatan Liljedahl
Lucas C. Villa Real wrote: > On 3/8/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I get errors about missing mod_wrap executable from udev at boot. I >> tracked it down to the /S/S/udev/rules.d/60-modprobe.rules file, which >> comes from Module-Init-Tools. It has a line saying: >> >> ENV{MO

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-commits] tools/ChrootCompile/bin BatchChrootCompile

2007-03-08 Thread Jonas Karlsson
2007/3/8, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 3/8/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > CVSROOT:/sources/goboscripts > > Module name:tools > > Changes by: Jonas Karlsson 07/03/08 12:25:08 > > > > Modified files: > > ChrootCompile/bin: BatchChroo

Re: [gobolinux-devel] udev rules from module-init-tools outdated?

2007-03-08 Thread Lucas C. Villa Real
On 3/8/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I get errors about missing mod_wrap executable from udev at boot. I > tracked it down to the /S/S/udev/rules.d/60-modprobe.rules file, which > comes from Module-Init-Tools. It has a line saying: > > ENV{MODALIAS}=="?*",RUN+="/sbin/mod_

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-commits] tools/ChrootCompile/bin BatchChrootCompile

2007-03-08 Thread Lucas C. Villa Real
On 3/8/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CVSROOT:/sources/goboscripts > Module name:tools > Changes by: Jonas Karlsson 07/03/08 12:25:08 > > Modified files: > ChrootCompile/bin: BatchChrootCompile > > Log message: > Added support for signing of

[gobolinux-devel] udev rules from module-init-tools outdated?

2007-03-08 Thread Jonatan Liljedahl
I get errors about missing mod_wrap executable from udev at boot. I tracked it down to the /S/S/udev/rules.d/60-modprobe.rules file, which comes from Module-Init-Tools. It has a line saying: ENV{MODALIAS}=="?*",RUN+="/sbin/mod_wrap $env{MODALIAS}" But there's no /sbin/mod_wrap. And the Modu

Re: [gobolinux-devel] New Freshen

2007-03-08 Thread Michael Homer
On 3/8/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/3/8, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 3/8/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 2007/3/7, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Hi, > > > > I've finished a pre-release new version of Freshen, that's had all the