On 3/9/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/9/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/3/9, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Well, hopefully I've fixed all of those. It now uses GetAvailable.conf
> > and Compile.conf for everything appropriate, and shouldn't throw t
On 3/11/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it better to setgid cdrdao to 'cdrecord' group, OR to put users in
> this group? (installer could default to that, or one would need to add
> them manually...)
> The bad thing with setgid'ing cdrdao and other CDR tools would be that
> an
Lucas C. Villa Real wrote:
> On 3/8/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I don't have the need for this type of fine grained security, but
>> there might be people who do. One question that does come to mind is:
>> is there a reason others have to have write access? Why not use 0664?
>>
Lucas C. Villa Real wrote:
> On 3/8/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Lucas C. Villa Real wrote:
>>> On 3/8/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Works great. But I don't think "others" should be able to write to the
cdrw, only users in 'cdrecord' group. So I
