I was browsing the online package browser
(http://gobo.dreamhosters.com/recipes/) and noticed that a lot of the
descriptions are (none). How would one go about adding descriptions? I was
thinking of adding some as I have the time.
:Peter
___
go
On 3/26/07, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ahhh, I see. You're right. My proposed solution would succeed finding
> the version number in the string, but wouldn't know what's the right
> thing to put instead. Well, I think that using the "-rX" suffix
> everytime, we'd be able to use bo
On 3/26/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:16:51 +0200, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > We can replace underscores with "[-_]" in the source regex when doing
> > the replacement in NewVersion; that would fix it (no access to CVS
> > right now to
On 3/26/07, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/26/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:16:51 +0200, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On 3/26/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> I know there were some discuss
On 3/26/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:16:51 +0200, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On 3/26/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I know there were some discussions on our revision token when we
> >> introduced revisions on rec
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:16:51 +0200, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 3/26/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I know there were some discussions on our revision token when we
>> introduced revisions on recipe, but I don't remeber the conclusion and
>> why
>> some de
On 3/26/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know there were some discussions on our revision token when we
> introduced revisions on recipe, but I don't remeber the conclusion and why
> some decisions were made. One such case is the Imagemagick recipe. The
> Imagemagick developers rel
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 13:02:50 +0100, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Jonas Karlsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2007/3/23, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > Warning: I think GNU Ghostscript is 8.55 and the non-GNU one has
>> > numbered itself as 8.56 even though the previous release was 8.54
I know there were some discussions on our revision token when we
introduced revisions on recipe, but I don't remeber the conclusion and why
some decisions were made. One such case is the Imagemagick recipe. The
Imagemagick developers release several revisions of each version, last
version a
Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Carlo Calica wrote:
> > On 3/21/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Yes, this is most probably the bug I reported a while ago, where my
> >> system was messed up (didn't boot) after I used DisableProgram...
> >> Great that you fo
10 matches
Mail list logo