Re: [gobolinux-devel] realtime LSM

2008-03-10 Thread Benjamin Bruheim
JACK developers has recommended molnar's rt-preempt patch. Things may have changed, but that was valid very recently. ___ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel

Re: [gobolinux-devel] realtime LSM

2008-03-10 Thread Lucas C. Villa Real
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lucas C. Villa Real wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> how was it, is the realtime lsm patch included in the gobolinux kernel? > >> it's the easiest way

Re: [gobolinux-devel] realtime LSM

2008-03-10 Thread Jonatan Liljedahl
Lucas C. Villa Real wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> how was it, is the realtime lsm patch included in the gobolinux kernel? >> it's the easiest way to gain realtime privileges, another alternative is >> set_rlimits which require no kernel

Re: [gobolinux-devel] realtime LSM

2008-03-10 Thread Lucas C. Villa Real
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:17 AM, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > how was it, is the realtime lsm patch included in the gobolinux kernel? > it's the easiest way to gain realtime privileges, another alternative is > set_rlimits which require no kernel patch, but it means you have to

[gobolinux-devel] realtime LSM

2008-03-10 Thread Jonatan Liljedahl
how was it, is the realtime lsm patch included in the gobolinux kernel? it's the easiest way to gain realtime privileges, another alternative is set_rlimits which require no kernel patch, but it means you have to run all apps that might ask for realtime threads under set_rlimits which can be hard i

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Summer of Code

2008-03-10 Thread Jonas Karlsson
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:38:40 +0100, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > I just saw that Google Summer of Code is on again. From what we had > discussed in the past meetings, we have a few tasks that are still in > our to do list or that are not progressing well. I think