On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:21:05 +0200, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/29/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:07:48 +0200, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Daemon monitoring has some really nice benefits. But it really is
>> > sw
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:35:08 +0200, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/29/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:49:28 +0200, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Big issue with bootstrap (of init process, not the kernel) is the
>> > e
On 9/29/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:49:28 +0200, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Big issue with bootstrap (of init process, not the kernel) is the
> > entire base should use the new system. This way all the events are
> > properly triggere
On 9/29/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:07:48 +0200, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Daemon monitoring has some really nice benefits. But it really is
> > swimming upstream against the flow of sysvinit. :-) Many daemons just
> > aren't designed
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:49:28 +0200, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/29/06, Ben Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hey all
>>
>> Has anyone looked at ubuntu's new 'upstart' init replacement coming out
>> in
>> the new edgy release?
>> It is entirely replacing init for ubuntu
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:07:48 +0200, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daemon monitoring has some really nice benefits. But it really is
> swimming upstream against the flow of sysvinit. :-) Many daemons just
> aren't designed to allow it, especially for some advanced features
> (sending
Daemon monitoring has some really nice benefits. But it really is
swimming upstream against the flow of sysvinit. :-) Many daemons just
aren't designed to allow it, especially for some advanced features
(sending signals, logging). This means Tasks are required. Having
two solutions (Tasks and D
On 9/29/06, Ben Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all
>
> Has anyone looked at ubuntu's new 'upstart' init replacement coming out in
> the new edgy release?
> It is entirely replacing init for ubuntu
> (Replying directly to you Jonas b/c I don't think the mailing list will let
> my messag
Hey allHas anyone looked at ubuntu's new 'upstart' init replacement coming out in the new edgy release?It is entirely replacing init for ubuntu(Replying directly to you Jonas b/c I don't think the mailing list will let my message in..)
BenOn 9/28/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
I'm updating the recipe for Bind and I thinking on how to start named.
Should it be a task or a daemon. Do we still use daemons?
And while on the subject, shouldn't we have a simple way to start
Tasks/Daemons at bootup, such as a list in BootOptions or a rc-dir with
symlinks?
Another note is
10 matches
Mail list logo
