On Jan 14, 2008 12:01 PM, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 13, 2008 4:31 AM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (more minimal than I expected). With the CheckDependencies in the
> > latest Scripts release, that works*; with the CVS version, I get this:
> > ('Facile', None,
On Jan 13, 2008 4:31 AM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (more minimal than I expected). With the CheckDependencies in the
> latest Scripts release, that works*; with the CVS version, I get this:
> ('Facile', None, '', None, 'NO_PROGRAM')
> ('OCaml', None, '', None, 'NO_PROGRAM')
> ('Qt'
On Jan 6, 2008 7:08 PM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> As mentioned in the dev meeting, I'm redoing Freshen in Python so it
> can use the system code as much as possible.
Following up on this, here's a minimal test case for some behaviour I
don't understand:
from CheckDependencies
On Jan 9, 2008 1:04 AM, Carlo J. Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 8, 2008, at 4:09 PM, "André Detsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Anyway, i think it would be good for us to discuss aspects of the code
> > in IRC. I can then explain you better whats going on there, and we can
> > discuss imp
On Jan 8, 2008, at 4:09 PM, "André Detsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2008 4:08 AM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> As mentioned in the dev meeting, I'm redoing Freshen in Python so it
>> can use the system code as much as possible. I have an early draft
>> writte
On Jan 9, 2008 1:09 PM, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2008 4:08 AM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > As mentioned in the dev meeting, I'm redoing Freshen in Python so it
> > can use the system code as much as possible. I have an early draft
> > written (get
On Jan 6, 2008 4:08 AM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> As mentioned in the dev meeting, I'm redoing Freshen in Python so it
> can use the system code as much as possible. I have an early draft
> written (gets list of programs, orders and outputs them) that I've
> checked in, but I
Hi,
As mentioned in the dev meeting, I'm redoing Freshen in Python so it
can use the system code as much as possible. I have an early draft
written (gets list of programs, orders and outputs them) that I've
checked in, but I'm not sure I'm doing everything the right way - in
particular, calling Che
I have checked in all my new code to the repository, and checked that
it all works. I will release it as 2.1 in a couple of days if there
are no major problems reported with it.
I've just squashed a bug that made some installs fail and upgraded my
system without incident after that, so it should
Well. I have managed to update my system entirely using my current
trunk version of Freshen - all except Util-Linux, which has syntax
errors and doesn't compile.
That means I've fixed all the bugs I was able to educe, though I
suspect there are still a few in there. It also means I'm going to
have
I used the wrong from address the first time. Forwarding.
On 3/13/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/13/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2007/3/12, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > On 3/13/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > 2007/3/12, Mic
2007/3/12, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 3/13/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2007/3/12, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > On 3/9/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 3/9/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > A featur
On 3/13/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/3/12, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 3/9/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 3/9/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > A feature that I think would be nice is to see why an application
2007/3/12, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 3/9/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/9/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > A feature that I think would be nice is to see why an application is
> > > in the list, i.e. what application that had that depend
On 3/9/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/9/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/3/9, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Well, hopefully I've fixed all of those. It now uses GetAvailable.conf
> > and Compile.conf for everything appropriate, and shouldn't throw t
On 3/9/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/3/9, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Well, hopefully I've fixed all of those. It now uses GetAvailable.conf
> > and Compile.conf for everything appropriate, and shouldn't throw the
> > errors with Current. That said, though, if you
2007/3/9, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Well, hopefully I've fixed all of those. It now uses GetAvailable.conf
> and Compile.conf for everything appropriate, and shouldn't throw the
> errors with Current. That said, though, if you don't have Current set
> to your latest installed version you
Well, hopefully I've fixed all of those. It now uses GetAvailable.conf
and Compile.conf for everything appropriate, and shouldn't throw the
errors with Current. That said, though, if you don't have Current set
to your latest installed version you'll run into trouble when
something depends on that
On 3/9/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/3/8, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 3/8/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 2007/3/8, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > On 3/8/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > 2007/3/7, Michael Ho
2007/3/8, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 3/8/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2007/3/8, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > On 3/8/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > 2007/3/7, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > I've finished
On 3/8/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/3/8, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 3/8/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 2007/3/7, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I've finished a pre-release new version of Freshen, that's had all the
2007/3/8, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 3/8/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2007/3/7, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Hi,
> > > I've finished a pre-release new version of Freshen, that's had all the
> > > features updated so that they actually work as expected.
On 3/8/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/3/7, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi,
> > I've finished a pre-release new version of Freshen, that's had all the
> > features updated so that they actually work as expected. As well as
> > that, there are a couple of new features
2007/3/7, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
> I've finished a pre-release new version of Freshen, that's had all the
> features updated so that they actually work as expected. As well as
> that, there are a couple of new features:
> - upgrade-system actually works now, and pretty much flawle
Hi,
I've finished a pre-release new version of Freshen, that's had all the
features updated so that they actually work as expected. As well as
that, there are a couple of new features:
- upgrade-system actually works now, and pretty much flawlessly. I've
just used it to update mine.
- Included in
25 matches
Mail list logo
