On 8/13/07, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What sort of regexes are they? Can we block edits adding more than a
> number of links at one time, say 5? In perl, I think that's
> (http://.*){6,} - If we can combine this with a sleep(20) in the save
> routine, that would make it slower for spamm
Hi,
Just to add another minor data point to the discussion, looking at the
wiki users list it seems to me that there's a lot of random-looking
accounts there that look spambot-generated.
http://gobo.kundor.org/wiki/Special:Listusers
-- Hisham
On 8/13/07, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Nic
"Nick Matteo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/12/07, MLA-Gobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Having just edited several pages with spam, it seems as though every one
> > is just a massive collection of links. That seems pretty easy to test for.
>
> There is already a system in place to block
On 8/12/07, MLA-Gobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 12 August 2007 16:39, MJ Ray wrote:
> > I'd suggest rate-limits, heuristic checks and other things from
> > http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-tech/2006-January/0128-tw.html
> Having just edited several pages with spam, it seems
On Sunday 12 August 2007 16:39, MJ Ray wrote:
> I'd suggest rate-limits, heuristic checks and other things from
> http://lists.indymedia.org/pipermail/imc-tech/2006-January/0128-tw.html
Having just edited several pages with spam, it seems as though every one
is just a massive collection of lin
mpb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would be more willing to monitor the wiki if some anti-spam barrier
> (such as reCAPTCHA) were in place.
CAPTCHAs are not anti-spam. Please read the W3C report on this issue:
http://www.w3.org/TR/turingtest#security
I'd suggest rate-limits, heuristic checks and
Hi,
> Went through those pages and deleted all but two, User:Unknown and
> Talk:GoboLinux_Embedded, as those, if spam, were unharmful. I also took a
> brief look at history and restored some edits. There might still be more spam.
> Someone more should probably be given patrolling rights and patrol
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:01:27 +0200, jan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello all,
>
> these pages appear to be added by spam bots, could someone with delete rights
> remove them
>
> http://gobo.kundor.org/wiki/Talk:Building_a_custom_GoboLinux_LiveCD/
> http://gobo.kundor.org/wiki/Guestbook/Guestbook
Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd also like to find some open-source code I can incorporate to
require image verification to edit from any given IP address, with
about a week timeout.
Image verification? You mean one of those eye test things?
Please don't. I failed one of those four times
On 7/28/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
Let me know if there are any objections to that plan, or if you have
any better ideas.
The OpenSceneGraph (http://www.openscenegraph.org) simply uses a
password-protected wiki, with a single password that "everybody in the
community knows". This
Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd also like to find some open-source code I can incorporate to
> require image verification to edit from any given IP address, with
> about a week timeout.
Image verification? You mean one of those eye test things?
Please don't. I failed one of those four
On 7/25/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone have an objection to me permanently banning IP addresses
that spam the wiki?
No. I've seen today the "latest changes" in the wiki and it was sad to
see that many of them were related to spam.
A lot of the spammers' effort seems to be focu
On 7/25/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone have an objection to me permanently banning IP addresses
that spam the wiki?
No. I've seen today the "latest changes" in the wiki and it was sad to
see that many of them were related to spam.
--
Lucas
powered by /dev/dsp
__
13 matches
Mail list logo
