I'm having the same problem with a 013-pre something machine. First
noticed it after I built a vserver kernel. I fix it using a livecd,
chroot to my root and SymlinkProgram BootScripts. Everything does
look fine. One thing I noticed, "shutdown -r now" doesn't restart but
"reboot" does. I've al
On 3/5/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually I'd like to keep standard names, using only lowercase for cvs and
> > svn.
> >
> Yes, you're right. And that's what I thought as well. I thought that
> $version was not used for version naming in SVN, but that it was set
> to 'svn'
2007/3/5, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 3/5/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Actually I'd like to keep standard names, using only lowercase for cvs
> > > and svn.
> > >
> > Yes, you're right. And that's what I thought as well. I thought that
> > $version was not
On 3/5/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I welcome that change. I think it's going to be easier to do that by
> > writing 2 new functions such as Extract_Name() and Extract_Version()
> > that should be used in scripts, instead of doing explicit calls to sed
> > expressions such as '
On 3/5/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm having the same problem with a 013-pre something machine. First
> noticed it after I built a vserver kernel. I fix it using a livecd,
> chroot to my root and SymlinkProgram BootScripts. Everything does
> look fine. One thing I noticed, "s
Carlo Calica wrote:
> I'm having the same problem with a 013-pre something machine. First
> noticed it after I built a vserver kernel. I fix it using a livecd,
> chroot to my root and SymlinkProgram BootScripts. Everything does
> look fine. One thing I noticed, "shutdown -r now" doesn't restart
Lucas C. Villa Real wrote:
> On 3/5/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm having the same problem with a 013-pre something machine.
>> First noticed it after I built a vserver kernel. I fix it using a
>> livecd, chroot to my root and SymlinkProgram BootScripts.
>> Everything does look
On 3/5/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure the problem actually is with the bootscripts.. Wouldn't
> this be the errors you'd get if you messed up the symlinks for
> BootScripts? Since SymlinkProgram BootScripts fixed it...
>
> Could it be DisableProgram that destroys wr
Lucas C. Villa Real wrote:
> On 3/5/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm not sure the problem actually is with the bootscripts.. Wouldn't
>> this be the errors you'd get if you messed up the symlinks for
>> BootScripts? Since SymlinkProgram BootScripts fixed it...
>>
>> Could it
On 3/5/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CVSROOT:/sources/goboscripts
> Module name:tools
> Changes by: Jonas Karlsson 07/03/05 19:27:59
>
> Modified files:
> Compile/bin: Compile
>
> Log message:
> Small fix for direct recipe passing.
>
2007/3/5, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 3/5/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > CVSROOT:/sources/goboscripts
> > Module name:tools
> > Changes by: Jonas Karlsson 07/03/05 19:27:59
> >
> > Modified files:
> > Compile/bin: Compile
> >
On 3/5/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Could it be DisableProgram that destroys wrong links?
>
Its very likely I used RemoveProgram. But I know I've used both on my
macbook without problems. I'll need to check Scripts versions.
--
Carlo J. Calica
__
Hi,
While working on Freshen I managed to break my system by having it
automatically install a new Glibc package (I fixed it from another
distro, so that part's ok). But is there a safe way to do that?
There's no minimum kernel dependency specified, which I guess was what
my problem was (the error
On 3/5/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> While working on Freshen I managed to break my system by having it
> automatically install a new Glibc package (I fixed it from another
> distro, so that part's ok). But is there a safe way to do that?
>
> There's no minimum kernel depende
On 3/5/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/5/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > While working on Freshen I managed to break my system by having it
> > automatically install a new Glibc package (I fixed it from another
> > distro, so that part's ok). But i
On 3/5/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Were you running an updated version of Scripts? The current version
> > should handle Glibc installation fine.
> michael@ ~]ls -l /Programs/Scripts/Current
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 gobo gobo 5 Mar 1 22:35 /Programs/Scripts/Current -> 2.6.2
> I can't fi
On 3/5/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/5/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Were you running an updated version of Scripts? The current version
> > > should handle Glibc installation fine.
> > michael@ ~]ls -l /Programs/Scripts/Current
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 gobo
On 3/5/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I meant more "should I drop -u keep?" - I don't know if it has any
> unmanaged files (or how to find out if it does), although since
> /S/S/ld.so.cache is a real file and not a symlink to
> /P/Glibc/Settings/ld.so.cache I thought it might.
Th
18 matches
Mail list logo
