On 3/5/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/5/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Were you running an updated version of Scripts? The current version > > > should handle Glibc installation fine. > > michael@ ~]ls -l /Programs/Scripts/Current > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 gobo gobo 5 Mar 1 22:35 /Programs/Scripts/Current -> 2.6.2 > > I can't find a newer version in the repository, at least. Also: > > michael@ ~]uname -r > > 2.6.17.11-Gobo > > michael@ ~]ls -l /Programs/Glibc/Current > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 gobo gobo 3 Mar 5 22:23 /Programs/Glibc/Current -> 2.4 > > > > Everything other than Scripts, BootScripts, Firefox, and Freshen is > > the out-of-the-box version from 013. The InstallPackage command was > > `InstallPackage -b -D -u keep Glibc 2.5`; would a different version be > > better? > > It shouldn't make difference. Detsch tested the upgrade on a 2.3 > system moving to a 2.4. I have never tried myself to upgrade Glibc. > Can anyone take a look into this? Maybe by running gobo inside qemu or > other emulator.. I don't have the time to test that right now, > unfortunately. I meant more "should I drop -u keep?" - I don't know if it has any unmanaged files (or how to find out if it does), although since /S/S/ld.so.cache is a real file and not a symlink to /P/Glibc/Settings/ld.so.cache I thought it might.
For now I'll just keep it blacklisted. Tomorrow I'll try a couple of different permutations of the InstallPackage command manually and try using Compile. Should have a new Freshen out then too where --upgrade-system actually works like it should. -Michael _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
