On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 5:40 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 11:32 AM Brian (bex) Exelbierd
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 4:53 PM Nicolas Mailhot
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Le mardi 21 mai 2019 à 10:43 +0200, Brian (bex) Exelbierd a écrit :
> > > > BUILDDATE=$(date
Le mardi 21 mai 2019 à 17:31 +0200, Brian (bex) Exelbierd a écrit :
>
> > > BUILDDATE=$(date +%Y-%m-%d)
> >
> > Please don't do that, that breaks build reproducibility.
>
> My understanding is that reproducible build systems typically provide
> a build date value.
A reproducible build means
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 4:53 PM Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
>
> Le mardi 21 mai 2019 à 10:43 +0200, Brian (bex) Exelbierd a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have submitted the first of my dependency review requests here:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712280
> >
> > Feedback is greatly
Le mardi 21 mai 2019 à 10:43 +0200, Brian (bex) Exelbierd a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I have submitted the first of my dependency review requests here:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712280
>
> Feedback is greatly appreciated so I can clean anything up on the
> next
> set of
Thank you for the reply - I'll work on that.
regards,
bex
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 3:25 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 21 May 2019 10:43:04 CEST Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have submitted the first of my dependency review requests here:
> >
> >
On Tuesday, 21 May 2019 10:43:04 CEST Brian (bex) Exelbierd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have submitted the first of my dependency review requests here:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712280
>
> Feedback is greatly appreciated so I can clean anything up on the next
> set of
Hi,
I have submitted the first of my dependency review requests here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712280
Feedback is greatly appreciated so I can clean anything up on the next
set of dependencies.
I am working on the main application packaging for gocryptfs
