Re: [go-nuts] Re: select is still a little unfair if there are more than 4 cases?

It was stated earlier in the thread that tip was using xorshift32+multiplication. I assumed that was what you were saying that PCG was not faster than. I have not tested myself but I have no reason to disbelieve the results on the PCG site. It's a red herring to compare against xorshift128+ or

[go-nuts] [ANN] laitos v1.0 - your all-in-one personal web server suite + tools for using the Internet via telephone calls and SMS!

Hello fellow Gophers. Happy new year! Here I present you a brand new project proudly and conveniently programmed in Go: laitos is the simplest and most straight-forward way to host your personal website, receive Emails, block ads and malicious websites at DNS level, plus much more. To

Re: [go-nuts] Re: select is still a little unfair if there are more than 4 cases?

I've said nothing about "multiplication". Where you take "multiplication" from? Xorshift+ is already good enough for most usages. PCG performance page didn't include results neither for xorshift128+, nor for xoroshiro128. But xoroshiro page has comparisons: http://xoroshiro.di.unimi.it/#speed

Re: [go-nuts] Re: GoLang dependency -> dep installation Issue , Burrow golang tool issues

It's probably better to install the latest binary from the releases page ( https://github.com/golang/dep/releases), which is the first recommendation under Setup. On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 3:11 AM Arun Singh wrote: > *No* I have not been able to install the dep tool, I

Re: [go-nuts] Re: multiple commands in one ssh session

Did you try out my suggestion in reply to Dominik, namely to use session.Shell instead of session.Run? On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 3:38 AM wrote: > Hi Dominik. Have you finally found the solution? I'm working on similar > task to run commands on cisco routers. Could you share you

Re: [go-nuts] How to know if interface{} data is nil w/o reflecting?

I really wish Go had not chosen to propagate Hoare's billion-dollar mistake. I do realize it's all tied up with the idea that initialization is cheap and zero values should be useful when possible, and therefore pointers, interfaces, channels, etc. need zero values. I wonder how different Go

Re: [go-nuts] Re: select is still a little unfair if there are more than 4 cases?

PCG isn't faster than xorshift+multiplication? Do you have a rebuttal to their website that indicates it is? (called xorshift* on that page) http://www.pcg-random.org/rng-performance.html Or are you just saying it's not meaningfully faster for the purpose of channels because the other channel

Re: [go-nuts] Channels vs Callbacks in API

Some counterpoints: * In the question of "Channels vs. Callbacks", the best choice is "neither". Write a blocking API with a fixed number of items and a Scanner-like Iterator for an unknown number of items. * It requires spawning a Goroutine even if none is necessary * It adds syntactic overhead

[go-nuts] Re: Go Community Charity Work?

EU has also been at it https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/files/counterf_par_trade/doc_publ_consult_200803/114_b_efpia_en.pdf El domingo, 24 de diciembre de 2017, 17:38:57 (UTC+1), Frank Davidson escribió: > > A few weeks ago, I saw this report on the PBS NewsHour: > > >

[go-nuts] Re: Go Community Charity Work?

Some research: Here's an FDA document on pharmacuetical barcodes: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM267392.pdf In the USA a barcode with the NDC (National Drug Code) is required. A13 explains the barcode: Under 21 CFR

[go-nuts] Re: Go Community Charity Work?

I've started on the code to generate the barcodes: https://github.com/verxcodes/codegen It's totally just a start, but I wanted to get it out so everyone could check it out and provide input, etc. Please take a careful look at the ECDSA encryption and whether or not I'm doing it right...

[go-nuts] Re: Embedded WebBroser

On Friday, December 29, 2017 at 8:58:33 PM UTC+2, Jason Petersson wrote: > > Hello is there a GitHub project or example of an application that can be > built for calling simple html and maybe java script? > https://github.com/zserge/webview https://github.com/asticode/go-astilectron HTH ain

[go-nuts] Re: Go Routine - With external program in C++

For when your goroutine caller needs to rejoin with the goroutine you could use a chan []byte to block until the command output string is ready. Channels are an important concurrent synchronization feature of Go that would keep all of your API response in one procedure. Calling exec.Command

[go-nuts] Re: Go Community Charity Work?

Well all we really have for a specification is that the problem is counterfeit medication from unknown sources at untrustworthy pharmacies in Kenya and we assume around the world, and we have a few possible Internet-based labeling solutions without manufacturer input. We would like to use Go

[go-nuts] Embedded WebBroser

Hello is there a GitHub project or example of an application that can be built for calling simple html and maybe java script? Thank you, JNP -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

[go-nuts] Go Routine - With external program in C++

Hello, I'm coming now from the JAVA world, I want to hear your opinion on this. I'm doing a small API-RESTful, I'm using Echo to not get out of scratch. I have a third party program that to run it, I squeeze a command like this "program.exe --verbose", with that, this program works on port

Re: [go-nuts] Re: [ANN] reverse proxy with ssl in less than 100 lines of code

The best way (currently) to do http->https redirects is to use HSTS: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_Strict_Transport_Security https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Strict-Transport-Security You may want to investigate HPKP as well. —dho On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 5:10 AM

[go-nuts] Re: [ANN] reverse proxy with ssl in less than 100 lines of code

Here is a better way to redirect from HTTPS to HTTP: https://github.com/nhooyr/redirecthttp/blob/d87881e4fbfddb1614c9d0934ea97c4163903301/main.go#L10-L19 Also, you don't need a secure variable in the handler, just check for r.TLS. On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 12:10:16 PM UTC-5, jzs wrote:

Re: [go-nuts] O_DIRECT and write Array returns Invalid argument error

On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:45 AM Viacheslav Biriukov wrote: > I expect that my alignment write from an array will work as it works with a slice. The code nowhere cares to make the alignment required by O_DIRECT proper for the write. It works in one of the cases just by

Re: [go-nuts] The o.done access on the once.Do function

FWIW, I agree with Caleb's reading here. It makes sense to talk about inlining and registerization when talking about how the Go memory model should be implemented - but I agree, with Caleb, that the memory model specifies the code to be correct. So if inlining and registers lead to the code being

Re: [go-nuts] The o.done access on the once.Do function

Surely single goroutine scenarios are trivial? Anything else would be a compiler bug. In multiple goroutine scenarios a lock must be held or some of the atomic functions are needed. Any other use that "works" are by accident say on x86 or some other stricter arch. I am no expert in this but surely

Re: [go-nuts] O_DIRECT and write Array returns Invalid argument error

OK. Got it. Full code and return values are: https://gist.github.com/brk0v/0a765b3a107128c0e7a208f2a9402db7 I expect that my alignment write from an array will work as it works with a slice. Thank you. On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 at 01:36, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > On Thu, Dec

Re: [go-nuts] The o.done access on the once.Do function

> I believe that program will always print 2, however when you bring multiple > Goroutines into the mix, I’m less sure. I'm using examples without goroutines because the crux of our discussion, as I understand it, is whether a plain read ('if o.done == 0') will read the result of an atomic write

Re: [go-nuts] The o.done access on the once.Do function

Isn't the lock operation an memory acquire operation that means that the next load of the done field needs to be loaded from memory? Perhaps it is not stated in the memory model exactly but this seems safe. On Fri, Dec 29, 2017, 08:11 Dave Cheney wrote: > > > On 29 Dec 2017,