On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 4:16 PM wrote:
> I wonder if what I'm seeing is expected.
It is. The language specification defines the selector to produce a single
value.
--
-j
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from
Very helpful. Thank you. I will edit my proposal based on this.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:17 PM Jan Mercl <0xj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Compatibility section of the proposal says: "I think that this would
> break no existing code, as a user function invocation untyped(EXPR) is not
> at
Think of something like this https://play.golang.org/p/GyPlYefS7ZW (maybe
the example could be simpler) --> ok means we found the most nested value
or the least one?
Le ven. 29 mars 2019 à 16:55, a écrit :
> Yes, that is expected. The right hand side of the assignment is
> `b[1].code`. That is
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:17 PM Jan Mercl <0xj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The Compatibility section of the proposal says: "I think that this would
> break no existing code, as a user function invocation untyped(EXPR) is not at
> present allowed in constant specifications."
>
> It's true that user
Yes, that is expected. The right hand side of the assignment is
`b[1].code`. That is a single value. The "magic" that allows a two value
return from a map lookup does not carry through to more complex expressions
that use the value from that lookup. It would get confusing really fast if
it
No mention of what platforms it supports. You may want to add that to the
docs also.
On Friday, March 29, 2019 at 5:46:29 AM UTC-4, Johann Freymuth wrote:
>
> Over the last few months I've tried to write a desktop GUI library that
> takes a slightly different approach to traditional GUI
* jlforr...@berkeley.edu [190329 11:16]:
> I get the error
>
> assignment mismatch: 2 variable but 1 values
>
> for the assignment statement in Part 2 but the assignment statement in
> Part 1 compiles. Both assignment statements have the same number of
> values, but it appears that referencing
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 8:27 PM wrote:
> However, in the case that I illustrated there is no such problem. I would
have thought that the
> language would allow this construct with any expression on the right
side, as long as it only has one
> map access.
Consider
type v struct{
For example in mulWW or addVV? It seems to maybe have something to do
with function arguments?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Last year's GopherCon Europe in the far-north (Iceland) was a great
success! This year GopherCon Europe turns to the far south of the EU, the
remote and volcanic coast of the Canaries, Tenerife! From the *30th until
the 1st of June*, we will have full days of talks, workshops, community
I updated https://github.com/golang/go/issues/31076 to reflect the comments
here.
Thank you both.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 9:57 AM Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:17 PM Jan Mercl <0xj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > The Compatibility section of the proposal says: "I think that
Well i did some something like this, seems to be working
arr := make([]*C.char, count_emp)
for i, s := range arr {
cs := C.CString(C.GoString(s))
defer C.free(unsafe.Pointer(cs))
arr[i] = cs
}
k =
Yeah, it's different. But it would certainly be cool to have a solution
that provides an Electron-like shell around a Vugu application. I'll make
an issue for it so it's noted for later.
On Friday, March 29, 2019 at 9:12:31 PM UTC-7, Mike Schinkel wrote:
>
> Oops. I think I spoke to soon. I
Hi Brad,
This sounds *very* interesting.
We are currently building a product using Lorca (
https://github.com/zserge/lorca) but am worried that it is not mature and
may never be, and that Chrome could change and disable to features that
make it possible at any time.
What are your plans for
Oops. I think I spoke to soon. I don't think what you have is an
alternative to Lorca, but an alternative to Vue.js *(which might still be
interesting.)*
*Whoever is moderating **if you see this in time **please just delete both
messages.*
On Friday, March 29, 2019 at 12:39:42 AM UTC-4, Brad
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 3:14 PM Neven Sajko wrote:
>
> For example in mulWW or addVV? It seems to maybe have something to do
> with function arguments?
W is a word (Word aka uint), V is a slice of word ([]Word). U is also
a slice of word, but I'm not sure what the difference between V and U
is.
* jlforr...@berkeley.edu [190329 15:28]:
> Thanks everyone for responding!
>
> However, in the case that I illustrated there is no such problem. I
> would have thought that the language would allow this construct with
> any expression on the right side, as long as it only has one map
> access.
>
I took out the Funcs for now, but no difference. But good point about the
signal! I currently dont have an exit button, Although I figure most people
just close a tab, or close the browser, so I guess I need to find a way to
make that work without an explicit button...? or maybe they just hit
You can see how the YottaDB (https://yottadb.com) Go wrapper does it.
Documentation of the API is at
https://docs.yottadb.com/MultiLangProgGuide/goprogram.html and source code
is at https://gitlab.com/YottaDB/Lang/YDBGo
Regards
– Bhaskar
On Friday, March 29, 2019 at 5:16:05 AM UTC-4, Ashutosh
The Compatibility section of the proposal says: "I think that this would
break no existing code, as a user function invocation untyped(EXPR) is not
at present allowed in constant specifications."
It's true that user function cannot be called in a constant expression. But
conversion to a user
Thanks let me check. Will update.
On Friday, 29 March 2019 09:23:31 UTC+5:30, Justin Israel wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, March 29, 2019 at 11:08:06 AM UTC+13, Ashutosh Baghel wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I am new to Go-Programming and having the following requirement, I need
>> to have Array of
Over the last few months I've tried to write a desktop GUI library that
takes a slightly different approach to traditional GUI libraries. It uses
ideas from immediate mode UI in order to be very lightweight and hopefully
somewhat idiomatic.
https://github.com/jfreymuth/ui
The API is now
Congrats, I am sure a lot of gophers waited for something like this !
I especially like this comment: "No node. No JS. No npm. No node_modules
folder competing with your music library for disk space"
On Friday, 29 March 2019 04:39:42 UTC, Brad wrote:
>
> Now that WebAssembly is available as
Hello, gophers.
My task: I have Go AST tree of next code:
https://play.golang.org/p/bKz3LGZyNtn
```
type s struct {
i int32
c byte
}
func main() {
var a []s = []s{s{1, 'a'}, s{2, 'b'}}
fmt.Println(a)
}
```
How to modify AST tree for better look struct initialization
24 matches
Mail list logo
