[go-nuts] Re: Webservices with Windows Authentication

2017-12-09 Thread ancientlore
I haven't done it, but these two might be a starting point. https://github.com/Azure/go-ntlmssp https://github.com/ThomsonReutersEikon/go-ntlm Mike On Saturday, December 9, 2017 at 5:59:41 PM UTC-5, snmed wrote: > > Hi all > > We are primarly working in a windows environment and developing web

Re: [go-nuts] Go language should become an ANSI and ISO standard.

2018-10-18 Thread ancientlore
The purpose of a standard, in my opinion, is to allow multiple implementations to be compatible. This seems counter to the open-source model, where there is a reference implementation completely in the open that encourages community participation and improvement. JavaScript needs a standard -

Re: [go-nuts] Re: do you use binary-only packages?

2018-10-18 Thread ancientlore
In the past (C/C++ days) we used a lot of third-party binary-only packages like SmartHeap for memory management and LeadTools for imaging. (I like to think of that as the "Programmer's Paradise" era.) I haven't used binary-only packages in many years, but I do wonder how a company like

Re: [go-nuts] What version of BoringCrypto is used in the dev.boringcrypto branch?

2020-04-07 Thread ancientlore
Thanks so much for the quick reply. I see where that comes from now. On Tuesday, April 7, 2020 at 12:40:52 PM UTC-4, Filippo Valsorda wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 5:45 PM Ian Lance Taylor > wrote: > >> [ + filippo ] >> >> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 2:00 PM ancie

[go-nuts] What version of BoringCrypto is used in the dev.boringcrypto branch?

2020-04-06 Thread ancientlore
Hi, we’re needing to use FIPS-validated crypto in a particular deployment. It looks like the dev.boringcrypto branch would meet our needs well. But I’m struggling to verify which BoringCrypto version is actually meant when the Go version is 1.14.1b4. Looking at BoringSSL I’m trying map b4 to a

[go-nuts] [generics] Example

2020-06-25 Thread ancientlore
, I'm sure my design could be improved a lot, and I'll do that when generics are released.) If anyone wants to do a comparison, you can look at: https://github.com/ancientlore/go-avltree (original version) https://github.com/ancientlore/go-avltree/tree/v2 (generics version) Regards, Mike -- You

[go-nuts] Re: [generics] Thank you Go team

2020-06-25 Thread ancientlore
+1. I found the new draft readable and in practice it feels quite natural. My hope was always that generics would "feel like Go". On Tuesday, June 23, 2020 at 12:34:30 PM UTC-4 Haddock wrote: > Also big +1 from my side and kudos to Ian for always answering to this > storm of objections and

[go-nuts] Re: Go Boring release schedule

2021-09-07 Thread ancientlore
In my experience, they lag maybe a week for a minor release like 1.16.6 to 1.16.7. I imagine it takes longer for a major release, especially if it's time to upgrade BoringCrypto (like b5 to b7). Mike On Friday, August 27, 2021 at 7:09:21 PM UTC-4 jonath...@gmail.com wrote: > Hey there, > > Go