Re: [go-nuts] Re: Random Number Generation in a given range

2017-07-10 Thread alok . singh
yep you are right ! fixed it thanks https://github.com/alok87/goutils/commit/9f5f19a65eedf1bc9be82ec3f3b42c92142b2b8e On Monday, July 10, 2017 at 8:15:13 PM UTC+5:30, Jan Mercl wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:41 PM Alok Kumar Singh > wrote: > > > in my usecasei

Re: [go-nuts] Re: Random Number Generation in a given range

2017-07-10 Thread Jan Mercl
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:41 PM Alok Kumar Singh wrote: > in my usecasei use this to generate random slice everytime > dont want the same result > using it to test my algos For that you need one only call to Seed at init(). -- -j -- You received this message because

Re: [go-nuts] Re: Random Number Generation in a given range

2017-07-10 Thread Sebastien Binet
Alok, On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Alok Kumar Singh wrote: > I have fixed it thanks > I wouldn't recommend using rand.Seed as you do: this defeats any attempt at getting reproductible results. -s -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [go-nuts] Re: Random Number Generation in a given range

2017-07-10 Thread Alok Kumar Singh
I have fixed it thanks On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 9:54 AM, peterGo wrote: > Alok, > > Your import path "github.com/alok87/goutils/random" is not valid for "go > get". The source is at "github.com/alok87/goutils/pkg/random". > > You write "for { rand.Seed(); rand.Intn(); }".

[go-nuts] Re: Random Number Generation in a given range

2017-07-09 Thread peterGo
Alok, Your import path "github.com/alok87/goutils/random" is not valid for "go get". The source is at "github.com/alok87/goutils/pkg/random". You write "for { rand.Seed(); rand.Intn(); }". Therefore, the range of values is not random. You write "arr[r] = rand.Intn(max) + min" which is

[go-nuts] Re: Random Number Generation in a given range

2017-07-09 Thread alok . singh
A python like range utility which can be used for this https://github.com/alok87/goutils/blob/master/pkg/random/random.go ```random.RangeInt(2, 100, 3)``` On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 at 5:43:55 AM UTC+5:30, Guillermo Estrada wrote: > > Hi, I've been reading some posts but I still have the same