I'd like to see something like this:
type Payment struct {
ActionType paypal.ActionType `xml,yaml,json:"actionType,omitempty"`
ReceiverList paypal.ReceiverList `xml,yaml,json:"actionType,omitempty"`
}
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
teisipäev, 21. juuni 2016 9:47.54 UTC+3 kirjutas rog:
>
> I feel your pain - we quite often have tags with entries for three
> formats (JSON, YAML and BSON) - but I'm not sure that collapsing them
> is necessarily a good idea, as the named tags indicate that the object
> is explicitly intended
I feel your pain - we quite often have tags with entries for three
formats (JSON, YAML and BSON) - but I'm not sure that collapsing them
is necessarily a good idea, as the named tags indicate that the object
is explicitly intended to be able to be marshaled with those formats.
That said, it's
2016-06-19 12:42 GMT+02:00 'Mihai B' via golang-nuts
:
> I have a struct that needs to be marshalled/unmarshalled using various
> serialization formats(xml, json, name/value). The tags start to represent a
> considerable effort[0] so I'm wondering if this is a common
Hi there,
I have a struct that needs to be marshalled/unmarshalled using various
serialization formats(xml, json, name/value). The tags start to represent a
considerable effort[0] so I'm wondering if this is a common use case and if
a change[1] to the encoding packages to specify the tag