@Ikai - I think this is a great idea, however like Ruslan I'm a bit
concerned about how much Google employees will be looking at the questions.
Would it be possible for us to have a mechanism for raising to a Googler
any questions that cannot be answered by the community. As a group we're
able to
I'm done with Google App Engine. This problem has been going on for
the past few weeks, with no adequate response/solution.
2012-02-07 03:30:18.825 /url/M 200 2195ms 16kb Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT
6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/17.0.963.46
Safari/535.11
2012-02-07
Hi Matthew,
You can easily identify people with a specific level expertise on Stack
Overflow by looking at their reputation or at previous questions they
answered, and a good way to attract people on a question is to setup a
bounty.
Members of the App Engine team and the community are already
Hi Johan,
I knew it's possible to identify someone's expertise - I was just asking
whether they could raise difficult issues to Google employees, but I guess
that' irrelevant if your're actively involved in answering questions
already. The only other issue I've found when using Stack Overflow
I'm trying to update to 1.6.2.1 but Eclipse doesn't allow me.
I see that in WEB-INF/lib the plugin copy 1.6.2.1 and 1.6.1 libraries.
If I delete the 1.6.1 libraries the compiler show me an error.
How can I update SDK with the Eclipse plugin? Do I have to wait until
Google release the plugin fot
What is your application id?
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:36 PM, A1programmer derrick.simp...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm done with Google App Engine. This problem has been going on for
the past few weeks, with no adequate response/solution.
2012-02-07 03:30:18.825 /url/M 200 2195ms 16kb Mozilla/5.0
Same issue here. Cloud Storage team, please help us.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine-java@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Hi Carlos,
No, you don't have to wait. You can always download the SDK from the App
Engine site and use the Configure SDKs link in Eclipse to point to it.
/dmc
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Carlos Aguilar c.aguim...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to update to 1.6.2.1 but Eclipse doesn't allow
I suggest opening an issue in the issue tracker.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine-java/-/0yzlVjl8B_8J.
To post to this group,
I'm sure this is a FAQ but I haven't been able to find the answer so far.
I have read there's a limit of 2-3 writes per second per entry group. If you
batch out multiple entities that all have the same parent is this ok? Or does
it count as multiple writes? I understand it is multiple
From my experiments, writing large #s of entities to a single EG in a
batch put is quite fast and does not cause the throughput problem.
Jeff
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Andrew Myers am2...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sure this is a FAQ but I haven't been able to find the answer so far.
I have
Hi John, You just need to read the entity group references above and
it will be clearer.
Appengine is a distributed datastore in which the files and entities
within are not
necessarily co-located. If you need to retrieve more than one type of
entity
within a transaction, those entities need to
Thanks Jeff. Much appreciated. I'm using Objectify too ;-)
On 8 February 2012 09:28, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.org wrote:
From my experiments, writing large #s of entities to a single EG in a
batch put is quite fast and does not cause the throughput problem.
Jeff
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012
Andrew, multiple writes of entities in a single batch put to the same
entity group count as 1 entity group write (but many more datastore write
ops - this might be confusing), so you won't run into contention issues.
--
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
plus.ikailan.com
Thanks Ikai. Appreciate the clarification!
All the best,
Andrew.
On 8 February 2012 11:42, Ikai Lan (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
Andrew, multiple writes of entities in a single batch put to the same entity
group count as 1 entity group write (but many more datastore write ops -
this
Since I upgraded to the latest SDK my css has been acting really weird. On
random deployments my CSS does not load at all. I then redeploy my site a
few times with no code changes, and the CSS works fine. I tried to look at
the CSS in chrome. If I open the resources panel and click on my
This sounds like the known CSS content type deployment bug that is fixed in
1.6.2.1 (again, after also fixing in 1.6.1.1)
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:37 PM, WillSpecht willspe...@gmail.com wrote:
Since I upgraded to the latest SDK my css has been acting really weird.
On random deployments my
I just looked at appengine System properties
(System.getProperty('file.encoding').
The file system encoding is set to ANSI_X3.4-1968. You might tinker
with trying to
change that?
On Feb 6, 10:51 pm, Tony Yang tonyyan...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Sir,
Thanks a lot but the problem is still there.
So looks like I just have to wait till this update pushes to eclipse.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine for Java group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine-java/-/lgHHYlgPfEAJ.
you can download the new sdk and then point eclipse to use that new sdk (i.e.
you do not have to wait for the eclipse plugin update)
On Feb 7, 2012, at 9:31 PM, WillSpecht willspe...@gmail.com wrote:
So looks like I just have to wait till this update pushes to eclipse.
--
You received
20 matches
Mail list logo
