[appengine-java] Re: Text Search Support for Java

2009-12-06 Thread a.maza
On 4 Dez., 12:04, Raphael André Bauer raphael.andre.ba...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:46 AM, a.maza andr.m...@gmail.com wrote: regarding compass: 1. Task queues do not work, because tasks might get executed in parallel what almost for sure messes up your index

Re: [appengine-java] Re: Text Search Support for Java

2009-12-03 Thread Max Ross (Google)
I'll also point out that while it's not on our official roadmap, we have marked http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=217 as started. Development is still in the very early stages so the only thing it's safe to conclude about timeline is that we don't expect it to be ready

Re: [appengine-java] Re: Text Search Support for Java

2009-12-03 Thread Erdinc Yilmazel
For small and readonly indexes you can use lucene and it works without any issues. All you need to do is generate your index outside the appengine environment and put your index files in the war package that is deployed. (Somewhere under WEB-INF would be the best place I think) Erdinc On Thu,

Re: [appengine-java] Re: Text Search Support for Java

2009-12-03 Thread Jess Evans
The compass solution is probably sufficient for pet projects. If I correctly recall, there are still serious scalability issues due to the way indexes are currently stored and restrictions on app store blob size. The main issue is initial timeouts due to the GAE design flaw wrt startup / initial

Re: [appengine-java] Re: Text Search Support for Java

2009-12-02 Thread Ikai L (Google)
Full text search isn't on our public roadmap: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/roadmap.html The link describes what we plan on releasing in the upcoming months. On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 3:28 PM, steveb steve.buikhui...@gmail.com wrote: I'm also very interested in this feature. I'm looking

Re: [appengine-java] Re: Text Search Support for Java

2009-12-02 Thread Don Schwarz
FYI, it should be possible to port SearchableModel to Java and run it on top of our low-level datastore API. We have no immediate plans to do that, but it would make a nice open-source contribution. You may want to play around with SearchableModel in Python first to ensure that its performance