Ok. Will hope that will successful resolved soon.
вс, 24 июн. 2018 г., 0:59 'George (Cloud Platform Support)' via Google App
Engine :
> Your issue warrants a more in-depth investigation. To facilitate
> communication and tracking of progress, we have opened this issue
>
Hi George.
That's ok. The main thing there is created issue. Thanks for helping.
On Monday, June 25, 2018 at 1:14:21 AM UTC+4, George (Cloud Platform
Support) wrote:
>
> Hello Aleksander,
>
> In fact there is no estimated time to resolution, but I am sure Developers
> will address the issue as
Thanks for a clear point here.
On Monday, July 2, 2018 at 6:47:01 PM UTC+4, Jordan (Cloud Platform
Support) wrote:
>
> It is not recommended to change the code that is currently running on a
> single App Engine instance. Since App Engine scales its instances of your
> application,
>
All outbound requests in the "appengine" of "python" and "go" issue via
"urlfetch" service. But for "node.js" it isn't available. There is
improvements on using the "urlfetch" service instead of a native libraries
in "python" and "go"? And why it isn't implemented for "node.js"?
--
You
I more want to know there are restrictions on fetching arbitrary URLs via
"urlfetch" or "native libraries"? I rewrote the Go (was used the "urlfetch"
service) implementation of the proxy service to Node.js (uses native
http/https libraries) and I want to be sure a performance didn't change.
On
Hi George.
Thanks, I will try to follow your offer.
пт, 10 авг. 2018 г., 21:52 'George (Cloud Platform Support)' via Google App
Engine :
> Hi Aleksander,
>
> If you speak about a different, even if somehow related issue, it is
> better to open a separate discussion on that subject. As this
Yes, it's better now, thanks. Before was difference from my PC and Cloud
Platform about 20Mb, now 10Mb.
On Wednesday, August 8, 2018 at 1:00:17 AM UTC+4, George (Cloud Platform
Support) wrote:
>
> Hi Aleksander,
>
> The issue should be fixed by now; you are encouraged to test it again.
>
--
I won't argue, it's enough for me. Thanks for helping.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To
t;
> One advantage that urlfetch has is that it provides you with an interface
> to make asynchronous requests
> <https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/standard/python/issue-requests>.
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, July 3, 2018 at 2:01:26 AM UTC-4, Aleksander Efremov wrote:
>>
>
for example by using the native `http` module. Did you
> try it?
>
> Steren
> Product Manager
> App Engine
>
> On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 10:25 PM Aleksander Efremov > wrote:
>
>> oh, yes, it's important note, thanks.
>>
>> On Friday, July 6, 2018 at 6:58:38 P
But yes, you're correct. Only for me is more important a streaming between
the client and the my app.
вт, 10 июл. 2018 г., 23:40 Aleksander Efremov :
>
> https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/standard/nodejs/how-requests-are-handled
>
> Streaming Responses
>
> App Engin
gt;
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 at 22:11 Aleksander Efremov wrote:
>
>> Yes, I use `http`/`https` native libraries and I use streaming of course
>> when it's possible. But as I understood from the AppEngine documentation,
>> streaming doesn't work and all responses are buffered in
>
> In Java8-land I've used both Apache HttpClient and OkHttp and both work
> normally.
>
> Jeff
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 10:06 PM Aleksander Efremov > wrote:
>
>> Thanks, then I will star of course that feature request. And it's very
>> good there isn't d
I use "Node.js" standard.
Sometimes I need refresh "express.js" configuration. For it I should stop
to accept a new requests, then wait while will resolved current requests
and whether to restart the "express.js" or call "exit" GAE instance.
How I can to notify the GAE manager that a new
14 matches
Mail list logo
