On Round 1A first problem, for the large set, I spelled the word
Possible with a lower case p in cases where the number was large.
Didn't notice it when I checked the output. This cost me the
qualifier. :-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Its true that making GCJ tester code that will accommodate all
differences and satisfy all participants is impossible to make. But
evaluating English words(NO,IMPOSSIBLE,RED etc) which are in output
in a case insensitive manner is not that difficult to implement.
It may reduce number of wrong
Yes, that is the point - the original poster asked if there was a
difference between Case #1:NO and Case #1: NO. The answer is that
there is and that the site tells you this if you do it wrong - you
won't ever make this mistake on a large input because you will have
uploaded a correct small input
For results with decimals it is easy enough to see the sample outputs
that the format uses . and there is always a note about acceptable
relative/absolute error (From which you can conclude not only that 0.5
is the same as 0.50 but also that 0.5 is the same as 0.501).
On May 24, 1:52 am,
Forgot to mention, try uploading a file that says Case #1:NO in the
practice room. The site will reject the solution saying that the file
must start with Case #1:
On May 27, 8:16 pm, Vexorian vexor...@gmail.com wrote:
For results with decimals it is easy enough to see the sample outputs
that
The answer is in your problem: there must be a space after Case #1:
A correct output is Case #1: NO
2011/5/28 Vexorian vexor...@gmail.com
Forgot to mention, try uploading a file that says Case #1:NO in the
practice room. The site will reject the solution saying that the file
must start with
