Re: Is guice-persist alive?

Ok, once you have set up the new repo, I will trawl GitHub for any guice-persist libraries that seem relevant, and just let the repo owners know about this initiative On 12 September 2017 at 09:50, Stephan Classen wrote: > Agree the more collaborators and users we attract the

Re: Is guice-persist alive?

Agree the more collaborators and users we attract the better. Lack of users and collaborators was the reason why apache onami was discontinued and went to attic. On 12.09.2017 10:47, David Sowerby wrote: I agree about the single focus - I wasn't suggesting diluting the purpose of the library

Re: Is guice-persist alive?

I agree about the single focus - I wasn't suggesting diluting the purpose of the library - I was thinking more that those who have developed libraries based on guice-persist who may be wondering about being dependent on it, and possibly also willing to collaborate On 12 September 2017 at 09:43,

Re: Is guice-persist alive?

Maybe in a second phase. I would first concentrate on pulling the different efforts for onami-persist together. But personally I prefer to focus on one responsibility with such libraries. And I see the main responsibility of onami-persist in providing JPA and JTA integration for guice. On

Re: Is guice-persist alive?

Seems like a good plan to me. Persistence isn't my strong suit, but I am certainly happy to help, and contribute where I can. Do you think it is worth contacting people who have Guice integrations with guice-persist, as that seems to be defunct? I'm thinking of projects like this one

Re: Is guice-persist alive?

So a quick search on github finds 3 forks of onami-persist. https://github.com/tocktix/onami-persist https://github.com/FingolfinTEK/onami-persist https://github.com/davidsowerby/krail-jpa Is there interest in joining forces? If so I would suggest I start a new github organization for