I am seeing a regression in beta4 that allows duplicate bindings in a
multibinder even when duplicates are not permitted.
I am attempting to git bisect but it takes my system forever to build
Guice, so it may be a while before I can locate the problem.
If anyone else could look into it, I
change.
sam
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Thomas Suckow tsu...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
I am seeing a regression in beta4 that allows duplicate bindings in a
multibinder even when duplicates are not permitted.
I am attempting to git bisect but it takes my system forever to build
at 10:57 AM, Thomas Suckow tsuc...@gmail.com wrote:
I missed those changes when I skimmed the commits.
It does appear they are the culprit (I finally figured out the maven
syntax to build only multibindings core to speed up bisecting).
Since that is intended, I will update my unit tests and make
We can likely make this work for scala-guice in a similar manner to the
Multibinder wrapper.
Thomas Suckow
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Christian Gruber cgru...@google.comwrote:
Let's get the OSGI fix in, and THEN cut beta5.
c.
On 2 Apr 2014, at 10:57, Sam Berlin wrote:
No way
I don't remember how off the top of my head. But this is a common question.
Look for the robot legs problem in the context of Guice and you should find
an example.
On Aug 16, 2013 7:40 AM, Jozsef Hegedus jhegedu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have read (but probably not completely yet understood)
I think you should inject the validator and processor into the class that
contains computevalue. I also recommend looking at scala-guice. If you do
find another way, I would love to hear it or add it to scala-guice.
On Oct 5, 2012 10:53 AM, Travis Stevens wilhel...@gmail.com wrote:
I have an
://github.com/Deathbobomega/scala-guice
It will hide this pain inside Scala magic.
--
Thomas Suckow
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Hilco Wijbenga
hilco.wijbe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 April 2012 17:47, Mirko Raner mi...@raner.ws wrote:
Hi all,
the Guice documentation for the Binder class states
)
bind(literal).annotatedWith(SynchronizedLinked.class).to(SynchronizedLinkedHashMap.class)
--
Thomas Suckow
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, April 19, 2012 12:30:27 PM UTC+2, Reinhard Nägele wrote:
This is, of course, possible. Look
I am no expert on Guice (only been using it for a few days), so I dare
not comment. However, you posted on Friday, at least give it another
day or two.
--
Thomas Suckow
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 10:41 PM, egolan egola...@gmail.com wrote:
anyone?
On Feb 10, 4:34 pm, egolan egola...@gmail.com
/8e16fcd0005fb78ba66a7f803166465340d63ebb/core/src/main/scala/net/codingwell/weave/LocalExecutorModule.scala
Thanks!
Thomas Suckow
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Alen Vrečko alen.vre...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for such late reply. Exam period. Didn't check ML. Will reply as
somebody might
I am using Guice with Scala. I am looking into adding the first actors
into my application and am a little turned off of using annotations to
inject as that would create a bunch more classes. Can anyone think of
an easier way to wire them in?
I suppose it really may not be any more classes as
11 matches
Mail list logo
