Comment #3 on issue 776 by mccu...@gmail.com: Avoid unnecessary object
creation if .withSource doesn't change the source
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=776
As mentioned above, when replaying/applying bindings using the SPI (for
example when using Modules.override
Comment #4 on issue 776 by salman...@google.com: Avoid unnecessary object
creation if .withSource doesn't change the source
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=776
Right, I agree that it can improve the current situation.
I have looked at the problem a few months ago
Updates:
Summary: Use ASM 4.2 (or 5.0_BETA for Java8 support)
Comment #5 on issue 759 by mccu...@gmail.com: Use ASM 4.2 (or 5.0_BETA for
Java8 support)
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=759
FYI, I'm also experimenting with ASM 5.0_BETA (via patched version
Comment #5 on issue 776 by sberlin: Avoid unnecessary object creation
if .withSource doesn't change the source
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=776
If it's a quick/easy win for the SPI case, we might as well submit this
patch and then look for more optimizations later
Comment #6 on issue 759 by sberlin: Use ASM 4.2 (or 5.0_BETA for Java8
support)
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=759
I'll take a look at pulling in the cglib changes and cutting a release with
them. Probably won't be for a bit though.
--
You received this message
Comment by andrey.c...@gmail.com:
There's probably a TYPO in constructor name. It should be
RealPaymentService, not RealPaymentRequestService.
For more information:
https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/MinimizeMutability
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Comment by alexandr...@gmail.com:
http://shorts.axaih.com uses guice/closure template/clusure library
For more information:
https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/AppsThatUseGuice
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-guice-dev group
Comment by alexandr...@gmail.com:
http://shorts.axaih.com uses guice/guava/closure template/clusure library
For more information:
https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/AppsThatUseGuice
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-guice-dev group
time and I cant figure out how to use @AssistedInject.
any help?
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/AssistedInject
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-guice-dev group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/AssistedInject
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-guice-dev group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-guice-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post
Comment #95 on issue 288 by r...@asleson.net: FinalizableReferenceQueue
still leaks
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=288
So this bug has not been fixed in the Guice 4.0 beta, correct? So is it
correct to assume that it won't make it into 4.0 GA? Bummer.
--
You
Comment #96 on issue 288 by mccu...@gmail.com: FinalizableReferenceQueue
still leaks
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=288
Guice 4.0-beta embeds Guava 11.0.1, which includes the
FinalizableReferenceQueue fix. You may still see a warning in Tomcat about
a ThreadLocal
Comment #97 on issue 288 by cow...@bbs.darktech.org:
FinalizableReferenceQueue still leaks
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=288
All of this could have been solved 6 (!!) years ago by simply adding a
close() method. See comment #3.
Add a close() method now and remove
Comment #98 on issue 288 by mccu...@gmail.com: FinalizableReferenceQueue
still leaks
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=288
There's no need for a close() method now - the weak/soft maps were
re-implemented in Guava 10 to avoid the need for the FRQ background thread
Comment #16 on issue 597 by tae...@gmail.com: Persist Extension:
UnitOfWork.begin() throws IllegalStateException when called multiple times
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=597
I am seeing the same behavior as indicated by the above link regarding the
PersistFilter
Comment #17 on issue 597 by remi.ban...@gmail.com: Persist Extension:
UnitOfWork.begin() throws IllegalStateException when called multiple times
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=597
Hi,
I have implemented a fix for this issue as already mentioned above.
http
Comment #18 on issue 597 by tae...@gmail.com: Persist Extension:
UnitOfWork.begin() throws IllegalStateException when called multiple times
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=597
So, that does not seem to be quite what I am seeing. My specific case is
as follows
Comment #2 on issue 709 by mccu...@gmail.com: Pull Guava out from jarjar
and attach it as a normal dependency.
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=709
Issue 689 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 709
Comment #1 on issue 689 by mccu...@gmail.com: Make Guava an external
dependency instead of jarjaring
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=689
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 760
Comment #3 on issue 769 by mccu...@gmail.com: Guice can not be built
against Guava 15.0-rc1
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=769
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because
Comment #6 on issue 760 by mccu...@gmail.com: Update internal caches to use
Guava's CacheBuilder API
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=760
Issue 769 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Comment #3 on issue 761 by mccu...@gmail.com: How can i set the classloader
for the Guice
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=761
There appears to be some integration support here:
https://github.com/englishtown/vertx-mod-guice
--
You received this message because
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #1 on issue 681 by sberlin: ComputationException due to
StackOverflowError during injection is hard to track down
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=681
There's unfortunately no way we can insert information into the error
Comment by gtmbaner...@gmail.com:
How can I deprecate a guice injection?
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-guice-dev group.
To unsubscribe from
Comment by lars.mic...@gmail.com:
Another Guice AOP example: http://www.larsmichael.net/?p=124
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/ExternalDocumentation
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-guice-dev group
Comment #3 on issue 694 by m...@lucidfox.org: JpaPersistService.end()
doesn't call entityManager.remove() in finally block
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=694
Any chance this will be fixed for 4.0?
--
You received this message because this project is configured
Comment #6 on issue 652 by taviana...@gmail.com: Execution of a
MethodInvocation.proceed() can cause an infinite loop
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=652
Any reason the attached patch won't work? It passes all the tests and
seems simple enough.
Attachments
Comment #7 on issue 652 by sberlin: Execution of a
MethodInvocation.proceed() can cause an infinite loop
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=652
That's a pretty good workaround. Could you maybe add a new multi-threaded
test that would have broken prior to the patch also
Comment #8 on issue 652 by taviana...@gmail.com: Execution of a
MethodInvocation.proceed() can cause an infinite loop
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=652
Sure, attached. The test isn't multi-threaded for simplicity, but it
captures the root of the problem
Comment #9 on issue 652 by sberlin: Execution of a
MethodInvocation.proceed() can cause an infinite loop
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=652
Nice, this LGTM, I'll patch it and test against our corpus and submit if
there are no errors. Thanks for submitting
Comment #2 on issue 266 by taviana...@gmail.com: Expose
UniqueAnnotations.create()
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=266
Right now I'm re-implementing UniqueAnnotations for my own extension.
Basically I have an AbstractMagicModule with a magic() method
Status: New
Owner:
New issue 774 by taviana...@gmail.com: Modules.override() loses source
information when the current source is skipped
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=774
This test case:
code language=java
Guice.createInjector(new AbstractModule
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Patch
New issue 773 by hussainp...@gmail.com: Patch for
/ExternalDocumentation.wiki
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=773
Learning Google Guice is a latest book published by PackT Publishers in
Sept. 2013. It is one of the few books
master moved from ecfa3c2cdcae to 401a6a43b41a
0 new revisions
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/list
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-guice-dev group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
Comment by rmene...@netflix.com:
Erick Burke's link on ported a Spring application to Guice: is currently
dead. Goes to the domain hoster's ad page. Please update it.
For more information:
https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/SpringComparison
--
You received this message because you
the RealBillingService constructor
(not the entire RealBillingService class). Why does this work, and what are
the differences between these two approaches?
For more information:
https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/GettingStarted
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Comment by rob.joha...@gmail.com:
Looks like I found an answer to my own question on the
[https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/JustInTimeBindings
JustInTimeBindings page]:
If a type is needed but there isn't an explicit binding, the injector
will attempt to create a Just-In-Time
Comment #11 on issue 369 by ash...@gmail.com: Convenient way to expose
multibindings and mapbindings from PrivateModules
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=369
I need this too. I'm using workaround with unique annotation for private
multibinder now.
--
You received
Comment by sebastie...@gmail.com:
I think the get method of a provider should respect the @Singleton
annotation, and it seems to not respect it in version 3.
For more information:
https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/ProviderBindings
--
You received this message because you
Comment by hussainp...@gmail.com:
I have written a beginner level book about Guice. Learning Google Guice
(http://www.packtpub.com/learning-google-guice/book) published by PackT
publishers explores Guice 3.0 and various extensions that surround it. The
book beings with general discussions
.
For more information:
https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/AvoidConditionalLogicInModules
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-guice-dev group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-guice
Comment by cgru...@google.com:
Guice 4.0-beta is in the maven central repository, as Stuart pointed out
above. Just use the normal maven dependency declaration.
For more information:
https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/OptionalAOP
--
You received this message because you
Revision: 3dbbb97748bd
Author: cgruber cgru...@google.com
Date: Thu Sep 26 15:47:08 2013 UTC
Log: Edited wiki page OptionalAOP through web user interface.
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=3dbbb97748bdrepo=wiki
Modified:
/OptionalAOP.wiki
Comment by lars.mic...@gmail.com:
I used Guice and Jersey to build a RESTful service serving
http://waterdata.dhigroup.com/mantaray/home.
Blogged about it on http://www.larsmichael.net/?p=114.
For more information:
https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/AppsThatUseGuice
--
You received
Comment by roberto.andrade:
Wondering which Maven repo 4.0 (beta) can be fetched from?
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/OptionalAOP
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-guice-dev group.
To unsubscribe from
Status: New
Owner:
New issue 771 by henn...@schmiedehausen.org:
Annotations.isAllDefaultMethods returns false for method less interfaces.
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=771
Description of the issue:
Steps to reproduce:
1. Annotations.isAllDefaultMethods
Comment #1 on issue 771 by sberlin: Annotations.isAllDefaultMethods returns
false for method less interfaces.
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=771
Is this causing a bug? The method is in inject/internal, and AFAIK it's
working as it's expected to work. It returns
Comment #2 on issue 771 by henn...@schmiedehausen.org:
Annotations.isAllDefaultMethods returns false for method less interfaces.
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=771
This annotation returns false:
public @interface Foo
{
}
This annotation returns true:
public
Comment #3 on issue 771 by henn...@schmiedehausen.org:
Annotations.isAllDefaultMethods returns false for method less interfaces.
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=771
And yes, it only returns true if all declared methods have a default value
set. The question is, what
Comment #4 on issue 771 by sberlin: Annotations.isAllDefaultMethods returns
false for method less interfaces.
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=771
What bug is this causing? The code is in internal and is intended for
internal use in Guice. External code should
Comment #8 on issue 771 by henn...@schmiedehausen.org:
Annotations.isAllDefaultMethods returns false for method less interfaces.
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=771
So, the problem is that any piece of code has to drag around this
dichtonomy between Annotation (IAW
Comment #9 on issue 771 by mccu...@gmail.com:
Annotations.isAllDefaultMethods returns false for method less interfaces.
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=771
I have a key that represents a type and either an Annotation or a Class?
extends Annotation
I want to create
Comment #10 on issue 771 by sberlin: Annotations.isAllDefaultMethods
returns false for method less interfaces.
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=771
I don't buy that it's a bug. The code is doing exactly what it was written
to do. You can argue that the current API
Comment #11 on issue 771 by henn...@schmiedehausen.org:
Annotations.isAllDefaultMethods returns false for method less interfaces.
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=771
Guess, I read the explanation for ofType wrong. Thanks for pointing this
out, I will try
Comment #2 on issue 320 by taviana...@gmail.com: Need a LibraryModule that
doesn't inherit from base environment by default
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=320
Any plans to implement this? Or can this already be done?
--
You received this message because this project
Comment #1 on issue 756 by johannes...@gmail.com: Memory leak by using
child injector and multibinder
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=756
Basically what is the problem, is that by using the toString method to put
the binding in the blacklist, this will lead to a new
flakage in a functional test.
-
Created by MOE: http://code.google.com/p/moe-java
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=52590552
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=0658cc19578a
Modified:
/core/pom.xml
/core/src/com/google/inject/internal/Annotations.java
/core/src/com/google/inject
Comment by jdoneill...@gmail.com:
General Comment:
How do you generate the guice-1.0.xml file for use with the -since param?
For more information:
https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=0658cc19578a8f5b9320adbbb034d98c7fdc6c7b
--
You received this message because you
master moved from 0658cc19578a to c01ba1d84d54
0 new revisions
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/list
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-guice-dev group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
flakage in a functional test.
-
Created by MOE: http://code.google.com/p/moe-java
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=52590552
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=8743a0bb0fb4
Modified:
/core/src/com/google/inject/internal/Annotations.java
/core/src/com/google/inject/internal
Revision: 5093ad45d726
Author: cgruber cgru...@google.com
Date: Sat Sep 21 00:44:43 2013 UTC
Log: Add API docs link.
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=5093ad45d726repo=wiki
Modified:
/Guice40.wiki
===
--- /Guice40.wiki
Revision: 6d64f80630cb
Author: cgruber cgru...@google.com
Date: Sat Sep 21 00:49:30 2013 UTC
Log: Add in API differential documentation.
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=6d64f80630cbrepo=wiki
Modified:
/Guice40.wiki
:
https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/Guice40
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-guice-dev group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-guice-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post
Comment by qiang...@gmail.com:
Refactoring may cause headache if going with constructor injection? e.g
adding more fields. You may end up with a constructor with many
parameters...
For more information:
https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/MinimizeMutability
--
You received
Comment #10 on issue 369 by justindh...@gmail.com: Convenient way to expose
multibindings and mapbindings from PrivateModules
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=369
My solution is to use expose in the configure method of the PrivateModule
with the help of TypeLiteral
Comment #2 on issue 251 by ben.ma...@gmail.com: @ProvidedBy @Singleton
doesn't work
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=251
Any chance this is fixed in Guice 4.0? Just ran into this for a servlet
filter.
--
You received this message because this project is configured
Comment #3 on issue 530 by jo...@weightpoint.se: Add
FactoryModuleBuilder.getProvider to support Command Pattern use case
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=530
Is this still relevant? Trying to do the same thing but the use case seems
outdated
--
You received
Comment #3 on issue 760 by mccu...@gmail.com: Update internal caches to use
Guava's CacheBuilder API
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=760
Latest patch against master
Attachments:
GUICE_760_switch_to_cachebuilder.patch 12.9 KB
--
You received this message
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Owner: cgru...@google.com
Labels: Type-CodeQuality Milestone-Release4.0
Comment #4 on issue 760 by cgru...@google.com: Update internal caches to
use Guava's CacheBuilder API
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=760
Comment #5 on issue 760 by cgru...@google.com: Update internal caches to
use Guava's CacheBuilder API
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=760
Thanks Stuart. I'll try to get this in this week.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Status: New
Owner:
New issue 769 by st...@entreesystems.com: Guice can not be built against
Guava 15.0-rc1
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=769
com.google.inject.internal.Annotations uses the deprecated
MapMaker.makeComputingMap() method which, in this latest
Revision: 9a9e69672f18
Author: sberlin sber...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Sep 3 17:07:44 2013 UTC
Log: Edited wiki page ExternalDocumentation through web user interface.
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/source/detail?r=9a9e69672f18repo=wiki
Modified:
/ExternalDocumentation.wiki
Comment by alexandr...@gmail.com:
Guice 4 supports async servlet?
https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=650
For more information:
https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/Guice40
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-guice
Comment by alexandr...@gmail.com:
Guice 4 supports async servlet?
https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=650
For more information:
https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/GuiceDiscussions
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Comment by liuyuan...@gmail.com:
The worst thing in 3.0 is error message. If any thing go wrong in
initialization, it generated a mass of meaningless message. I hope 4.0 have
improved this
For more information:
https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/Guice40
--
You received
Status: New
Owner:
New issue 768 by m.zabel...@gmail.com: guice-servlet+guice-persist --
Memory leak
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=768
When a simple guice servlet application is created, e.g. following the
example in the wiki
(https://code.google.com/p
= inj.getInstance(Bar.class);
Foo fooOne = myBar.getFoo();
Foo fooTwo = myBar.getFoo();
you can also take on this blog site:
http://nfljerseyscheapjerseyscheapnfljerseys.blogspot.com
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/InjectingProviders
://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/InjectionPoints
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-guice-dev group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-guice-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group
://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/InjectionPoints
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-guice-dev group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-guice-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group
://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/InjectionPoints
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-guice-dev group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-guice-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post
Status: New
Owner:
New issue 767 by colbert.philippe: Provide all versions of Guice in Maven
Central Repositoryonly Guice v1.0 is available right now!
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=767
Description of the issue:
Steps to reproduce:
1. Search Maven
Comment #4 on issue 730 by bimsc...@gmail.com: Automatically started
UnitOfWork is never ended
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=730
Will this fix be part of Guice 4.0?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #1 on issue 767 by mccu...@gmail.com: Provide all versions of Guice
in Maven Central Repositoryonly Guice v1.0 is available right now!
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=767
All Guice versions from 1.0 to 4.0-beta are already
Comment #6 on issue 730 by spootsy@gmail.com: Automatically started
UnitOfWork is never ended
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=730
I was hoping they'd include a patch of some kind but I don't see any
changes in trunk. It's a shame, because the current semantics
Comment by gem...@gmail.com:
when 4.0 will be released?
For more information:
https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/Guice40
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-guice-dev group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 766 by christia...@gmail.com: Christian Gruber Blog
Roll Link
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=766
Heh. Thanks. I neglected to migrate this when I moved to the US. :)
Clearly I need to blog more.
--
You received
Status: New
Owner:
New issue 764 by vesko.m@gmail.com: @Finder annotation issue
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=764
In @Finder annotation returnAs() has default value Collection.class.
However, if you forget to specify it, it throws an exception because
Status: New
Owner:
New issue 765 by alex.che...@gmail.com: Lazily loaded collections has no
session if method is not marked @Transactional
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=765
Description of the issue:
Encountered a problem with how lazy loaded collections were
Status: New
Owner:
New issue 766 by robotta...@gmail.com: Christian Gruber Blog Roll Link
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=766
Description of the issue:
Steps to reproduce:
1. Click Link
2. See domain squatting page.
--
You received this message because
Comment #13 on issue 382 by leetch...@gmail.com: No source jars in maven
repository
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=382
anything for guice 2.0 backports? thanks for the sources-jar but would be
nice to have it in mvn repo too!
--
You received this message because
Comment by patrick@gmail.com:
You can easily create the jdiff yourself:
{{{git clone https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/}}}
modify build.xml:
{{{
property name=old.api value=3.0/
property name=new.api value=4.0/
}}}
run the ant target:
{{{ant jdiff}}}
For more information:
https
Comment #14 on issue 618 by queen...@arcbees.com: Make guice-servlet more
adaptable
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=618
Hasn't this been fixed?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may
Status: New
Owner:
New issue 762 by mwisni...@gmail.com: Logger should be injected into static
members
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=762
While guice has built-in support for injecting java.util.logging.Logger
into instance fields, it does no such thing
Status: New
Owner:
New issue 763 by chenwei...@gmail.com: something is weird, using thread
pool in AOP
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=763
Description of the issue:
using thread pool in AOP: fixedPool.submit
there is weird that fixedPool.submit called a lots times
Comment #1 on issue 763 by chenwei...@gmail.com: something is weird, using
thread pool in AOP
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=763
Description of the issue:
using thread pool in AOP: fixedPool.submit
there is weird that fixedPool.submit called a lots times
Steps
Updates:
Status: WorkingAsIntended
Comment #2 on issue 763 by sberlin: something is weird, using thread pool
in AOP
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=763
AOP in Guice does not allow offloading the invocation to a separate thread.
--
You received this message
Comment #14 on issue 218 by ssk...@qualys.com: Assisted inject can't match
generics parameters correctly
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=218
I am also facing a situation similar to @ogregoire. Something to the effect
of:
class AugmentedQueryFactory {
public X
Comment by andrei.w...@gmail.com:
jcatapult site:
https://code.google.com/p/jcatapult/
For more information:
https://code.google.com/p/google-guice/wiki/3rdPartyModules
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
google-guice-dev group.
To unsubscribe from
Comment #1 on issue 761 by mccu...@gmail.com: How can i set the classloader
for the Guice
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=761
Could you give more details about the particular issue you're trying to
solve? Guice operates on types not XML, and types already have
Comment #2 on issue 761 by stream1...@gmail.com: How can i set the
classloader for the Guice
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=761
Well, i want to use guice in vertx (http://vertx.io.) as lang extend, but a
lib.
Vertx have own classloader, i should use that class
401 - 500 of 2138 matches
Mail list logo
