Great, thanks!
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:05 AM, google-gu...@googlecode.com wrote:
Comment #5 on issue 806 by sa...@google.com:
ContinuingHttpServletRequest: Make cookies immutable
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=806
Sure -- it'd be great to have you actively
Right now we can require bindings but that just spits out a missing binding
error. I think it would be cool to allow users to specify a why it's
required.
requireBinding(UnitOfWork.class, Persistence provider must bind an
implementation for the unit of work to be managed. This is likely not a
2010/7/30 Endre Stølsvik stols...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:48, Stuart McCulloch mccu...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/7/28 Endre Stølsvik stols...@gmail.com
So the don't proxy method is basically worthless, then?
well the method does exactly what it says it will do - proxies won't be
, Dhanji R. Prasanna dha...@gmail.comwrote:
(I mean, you can't really inject until a dep is injected first anyway, so
this ordering is natural).
I agree that this order is natural - but that is where I have understood
that Guice didn't bother: It just injected down the road, supplying proxies
Hey thanks for this list...
Persist extension is wanting, It'll be another week at least before I can
give it the right attention. For servlet, we need to build some kind of
introspection API that's similar to injector's, but that can wait I suppose.
If we can turn injector builder's options
How strange! =)
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Max Bowsher m...@f2s.com wrote:
On 07/07/10 01:29, Dhanji R. Prasanna wrote:
Does it? It only installs PersistenceFilter if you specify unit of work
as request. So in a non-servlet app it will never load that class.
We might do as you
It was just an experiment--it's going to be removed entirely. We need to
rethink it from the ground up.
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Max Bowsher m...@f2s.com wrote:
The code in the lifecycle directory of the source looks rather interesting.
On the other hand, there has been mention of
Does it? It only installs PersistenceFilter if you specify unit of work as
request. So in a non-servlet app it will never load that class.
We might do as you suggest anyway though--haven't quite finalized the design
of how PersistFilter should work..
Dhanji.
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Max
I didn't say anything about changing the build system to maven, just make
them proper build poms. Our ant build scripts are in need of some attention
themselves.
Dhanji.
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Max Bowsher m...@f2s.com wrote:
On 02/07/10 06:23, Dhanji R. Prasanna wrote:
That pom
That pom is only a distribution pom. I think if we change it we should make
it a proper build pom. Greg Kick is the right person to talk to because he
handles our (Google's) official maven repo.
Dhanji.
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Sam Berlin sber...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe there is a
Sam,
Sounds awesome! I would love to also include the cleaned up guice-persist
extension as well as the fixes to Servlet module to properly support
multiple servlet pipelines in one app (potentially useful for app containers
like Tomcat).
Dhanji.
PS: we should also think about getting a blog
We should just obfuscate Immutable* so it doesn't bother IDE importers.
Wonder if Jarjar can do that.
Dhanji.
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Johannes Schneider maili...@cedarsoft.com
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/10/2010 08:20 PM, Eric Burke wrote:
-1 to
Also feels like our startup time on GAE is slow. I'm not sure that's
related to this but it's also something we should keep an eye on.
Dhanji.
On Monday, April 26, 2010, Sam Berlin sber...@gmail.com wrote:
Were you able to dig into what's going on at all? I'm scanning through some
old issues
1
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:31 PM, je...@swank.ca limpbiz...@gmail.comwrote:
What should the following program print?
@Singleton
class B {
static int instanceCount = 0;
int instanceId = instanceCount++;
public static void main(String[] args) {
Injector injector =
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:01 AM, codesite-nore...@google.com wrote:
Line 5: parent
---
Aaah. . . . I'm learning Maven a bit here. The parent is another target
that . .. owns this?
Oh no! you are learning
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:17 AM, codesite-nore...@google.com wrote:
Comment #6 on issue 239 by dhanji: Integrate Warp-Servlet as
com.google.inject.servlet
http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/issues/detail?id=239
and elsewhere
serve(/xx).with(..)
er, this should be
I am seeing loads of abuses of eager singleton as a startup
lifecycle hook. I wonder if it would be worth us deprecating it or
making it show a warning of some sort.
Since this doesn't really mean anything in PROD mode, perhaps it
should be an annotation instead? bind()
, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 1, 9:44 pm, Dhanji R. Prasanna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am seeing loads of abuses of eager singleton as a startup
lifecycle hook. I wonder if it would be worth us deprecating it or
making it show a warning of some sort.
Since this doesn't
18 matches
Mail list logo
