That pom is only a distribution pom. I think if we change it we should make it a proper build pom. Greg Kick is the right person to talk to because he handles our (Google's) official maven repo.
Dhanji. On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Sam Berlin <[email protected]> wrote: > I believe there is a pom.xml in guice trunk, but boy is it old... > (referencing 1.0-RC2). As much as I hate dealing with maven, a lot of > people do use it.. so a working pom that can be submitted to a repository > would be great. If you're able to clean it up & make it stable, that would > help with submitting it. > > I know nothing about the grapher extensions, so can't really speak for > it... anyone else know the state of it? > > Sam > > On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Max Bowsher <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 30/06/10 20:57, Sam Berlin wrote: >> > A small status update on releasing a new version... >> > >> > Still needs to be done: >> > - Bob needs to spend some time reviewing the changes. >> > - Wiki needs to be updated to reflect a Guice 3.0 world. >> > - @since tags need to be added or modified. >> > - Dhanji wants to include the new guice-persist & a servlet fix, but >> > they aren't true blockers for a release (just awesome additions). >> > - some recent issues: 507, 508, and 509. >> > - audit old issues to make sure there's nothing blocking (I don't think >> > there is). >> > >> > Decided: >> > - Everyone is OK (so far) with a version number of 3.0. >> > - JIT providers / autobinders / etc.. will not be in the 3.0 release. >> > - Refactoring the internal package is shelved, in favor of a solution >> > that will hide the package from IDE autocompletions (at which point we >> > can refactor at will in internal). >> > >> > That sound about right? >> >> Doesn't _have_ to be done before the release but would be nice: >> * get some Maven2 pom.xml files sorted, and ideally into trunk this time. >> >> I'd be happy to work on that and suggest we simply aim to have minimal >> POMs suitable for submitting the built jars to the maven repository - >> punt on any thoughts of making the POMs good enough to assist in >> generating Eclipse or other IDE projects for now. >> >> >> Oh, and also: >> * Can we include a guice-grapher jar in the 3.0 release? >> >> Max. >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "google-guice-dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<google-guice-dev%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice-dev?hl=en.
