Re: CellTree data refresh

2011-04-10 Thread cbauer
Furthermore, if you use setChildOpen(false)/setChildOpen(true) recursively to trigger a data pull and reload of your CellTree, you will run into this bug: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6246 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: InlineLabel doesn't display a subsequent blank space in IE (but does otherwise.)

2011-04-10 Thread Thomas Broyer
There is a bug in IE, try this in IE Developer Tools (tried it in IE8, on an about:blank page): document.body.innerHTML=span id=foo/span bar document.body.innerHTML It'll output SPAN id=foo/SPANbar (notice that the space has disappeared). That bug can be worked around though:

Re: RequestBuilder don't store coockies?

2011-04-10 Thread Ste/=an
This has been driving me nuts for some time and I finally figured out what I did wrong. Maybe your problem is the same. I was using the wrong hostname in the URL, i.e. localhost instead of 127.0.0.1. Explanation: The GWT-plugin's default URL when launching the app is http://127.0.0.1:/... so

Re: Plugin failed to connect to Development Mode

2011-04-10 Thread Jeff Chimene
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 7:54 PM, facundo schwindt facu0...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone I was developing an app in development mode. Recently I got a Mac with snow leopard. The app run perfectly in Windows7. But I've imported the project into workspaces in Snow Leopard OS and when I try

Re: RequestFactory: return persisted ID in proxy after successful persist()

2011-04-10 Thread Ido
On Mar 17, 3:28 pm, Jake Wharton jakewhar...@gmail.com wrote: Is this possible using the editors as well? When you flush the driver you get a RequestContext whose fire() only accepts a ReceiverVoid. Hi, Did you find any solution for that? I'm facing the same problem now in which I would like

Re: RequestFactory: return persisted ID in proxy after successful persist()

2011-04-10 Thread Y2i
The flush returns whatever was passed to edit() so it can be cast back to the right type. You can also keep the context that is passed to edit() in an activity and then simply re-use it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To

Re: MVP vs PureMVC

2011-04-10 Thread Rodolphe Gomes
No opinion or experience of production of one of theses solutions ? Thanks for any help On Apr 8, 8:36 am, Rodolphe Gomes rodolphe.go...@gmail.com wrote: I am talking abouthttp://puremvc.org/(NOT the concept MVC). There is a sample

Re: MVP vs PureMVC

2011-04-10 Thread Y2i
I use MVP as described here http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideMvpActivitiesAndPlaces.html together with RF http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideRequestFactory.html and editors http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideUiEditors.html So far there

Re: java.lang.AssertionError after upgrading from gwt 1.5.2 to gwt 1.6.4 (when run in hosted mode)

2011-04-10 Thread Paul Robinson
java.lang.AssertionError: The style name 'margin-top' should be in camelCase format at com.google.gwt.dom.client.Style$.assertCamelCase$(Style.java:63) at com.google.gwt.dom.client.Style$.setProperty$(Style.java:42) at

Re: java.lang.AssertionError after upgrading from gwt 1.5.2 to gwt 1.6.4 (when run in hosted mode)

2011-04-10 Thread scono1986
In version gwt 1.5.2 I used margin-top, my application runs well. So after upgrading to gwt 1.6.4, If I still use margin-top, apart from the error message (AssertionError), isn't my application affected ? On Apr 11, 4:10 am, Paul Robinson ukcue...@gmail.com wrote: java.lang.AssertionError: The

Re: Large PopupPanel can't scroll

2011-04-10 Thread Craig Mitchell
If anyone is interested, my approach was all wrong. Much better to disable the windows scroll panels Window.enableScrolling(false); and then use ScrollPanels (that resize to the window). That way the ScrollPanels scroll bars will actually get disabled properly, and you can put a ScrollPanel

[gwt-contrib] Fwd: Trying to address issue 6234 (Support RequestFactory service inheritance on the client) (issue1411802)

2011-04-10 Thread Johannes Tuchscherer
-- Forwarded message -- From: jtuchsche...@gmail.com Date: Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 00:13 Subject: Trying to address issue 6234 (Support RequestFactory service inheritance on the client) (issue1411802) To: jtuchsche...@gmail.com Cc: google-web-toolkit-contributors@googlegroups.com,

[gwt-contrib] Re: Trying to address issue 6234 (Support RequestFactory service inheritance on the client) (issue1411802)

2011-04-10 Thread t . broyer
See my comments here http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1384802/ and here http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5807#c3 In brief: - there has to be an annotation added to these specific RequestContext interfaces (also, they might not extend RequestContext and they don't

[gwt-contrib] Re: Add SafeUri type, similar to SafeHtml but for values in a URL attribute context. (issue1380806)

2011-04-10 Thread t . broyer
I followed the approach from the SafeStyles for the checks in the generator, with the exception that I log a warning rather than throw when a SafeUri is used outside a URL attribute context. I updated the ClippedImageImpl's internal SafeHtmlTemplates so it doesn't log such a warning, and fixed a

[gwt-contrib] Re: Add SafeUri type, similar to SafeHtml but for values in a URL attribute context. (issue1380806)

2011-04-10 Thread xtof
I think this is pretty much ready, except for one thing I just thought of. Sorry, I should have thought of that earlier :/ In ClippedImageImpl, we're using a SafeUri in the context of a url() style expression (background: url({3})). However, the contract of SafeUri is currently not tight enough

[gwt-contrib] Re: Add SafeUri type, similar to SafeHtml but for values in a URL attribute context. (issue1380806)

2011-04-10 Thread t . broyer
On 2011/04/10 18:32:38, xtof wrote: I think this is pretty much ready, except for one thing I just thought of. Sorry, I should have thought of that earlier :/ In ClippedImageImpl, we're using a SafeUri in the context of a url() style expression (background: url({3})). However, the

[gwt-contrib] First change for GWT end-to-end testing framework. (issue1408803)

2011-04-10 Thread kjin
Reviewers: jat, skybrian, rjrjr, bobv, Description: First change for GWT end-to-end testing framework. Please review this at http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1408803/ Affected files: A user/src/com/google/gwt/testing/Testing.gwt.xml A user/src/com/google/gwt/testing/client/After.java