I have an app with a DataGrid on it and a vertical Scrollbar. Works as
expected - when more data is available then fits within grid, vertical
scrollbar allows user to scroll down. On iPad, however, the scrollbar is
not visible. Strangely, scrolling still works. It's just that the
scrollbar
this subject is really important for me;
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/vRe1GvuKrgcJ.
To post to this group, send email to
If Axis spawns threads internally you can't use it on AppEngine unless you
modify Axis to use AppEngines ThreadManager.
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/wiki/WillItPlayInJava states:
*JAX-WS is supported for web service clients but not for servers. To write
a SOAP server on App Engine
Just searched a bit and I think the post in question
was https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/aemVcEjK_5I/7VISroJi2VcJ
But if its seems to be solved since GWT 2.3 it should be fine to reuse the
editor driver.
-- J.
Am Freitag, 2. November 2012 03:30:36 UTC+1 schrieb Thomas
Thanks guys! I think I will call edit() on a new instance, as this is a
nice way of doing it.
Also, are there significant benefits to re-using an editor? Mine is
declared as final at the top of my view, then in edit() I am calling
driver.initialize() and then driver.edit(object). That means
Yes and no. You only need to call initialize() once.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/mOoij-EcmNgJ.
To post to this group, send
i'm trying to integrate jqxgrid and write a gwt wrapper around it. (it's
some jquery grid) i know i can write native js methods, but this isn't
enough. i need to dynamically build the call and then execute it as if it
was sent from the server inside a script tag. how can i do that?
--
You
This is how I usually do it (not sure if this is the best approach).
In my View:
public class AccountDetailView {
public interface AccountDisplayDriver extends
RequestFactoryEditorDriverAccountProxy, AccountDisplayEditor {}
@UiField AccountDisplayEditor accountDisplayEditor;
I'm using Eclipse Helios on Windows 7, with GWT SDK 2.3. I've got a few GWT
projects with GWT 2.3 SDK. Those projects were created a couple years ago.
I'm trying to create a new 'Web Application Project' (aka GWT or GAE
project) and when I do so, I get the following error:
Creation of
Thank you for your answers;
i am only allowed to use javax.xml.soap and JAXB by GAE .. uff
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
When we have a roadmap GWT?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/ZnMVnoiO3AUJ.
To post to this group, send email to
Hi group folks!
I want to be able to retrieve RPC-serialized objects via HTTP GET. I don't
really need a service based serialization mechanism but started with
gwt-rpc before RequestFactory was around. At this point I'd prefer not to
migrate to RequestFactory if I can avoid it because of
Hi John,
Is this applicable for DataGrid too?
Please see here
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13151108/datagrid-in-gwt-cant-clear-it#comment17894401_13151108for
details.
Thanks,
Mohit
On Tuesday, 9 November 2010 01:11:35 UTC+5:30, Jeff Schwartz wrote:
Using one of the concrete classes
I am really confused , i used javax.xml.soap;
getting the same exception;
java.security.AccessControlException: access denied (java.lang
.RuntimePermission modifyThreadGroup);
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Marcos muss...@gmail.com wrote:
When we have a roadmap GWT?
What do you want a roadmap for?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to
How do you plan to get the payload of any GWT-RPC request to the server
when using HTTP GET? Using URL parameters can be pretty unsafe because
every GWT-RPC payload should contain your app's security token / session id
to prevent CSRF attacks.
-- J.
--
You received this message because you
So this will cause all files to be downloaded over and over again.
Is there a way to do this fix just for IOS devices.
Jeffrey Roe,
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Nicolas Hoby nicolas.h...@gmail.com wrote:
Works perfect, thank you!
Just for completion, to install the filter add the
if i remove the App Engine i can use axis or other ways
the thing is i dont want to disable it, but i am not event using it,
restrictions are for some purposes i think
what do you suggest? (JENS)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web
If you dont plan to deploy your app to AppEngine then remove AppEngine from
your project. If you want to use AppEngine then you should read AppEngine
documentation and ask for help on the AppEngine group.
I haven't used AppEngine so far, so I can't help you any more.
Also
You could write the filter to only affect POSTs
Or, you could configure the filter mapping to only apply the filter to your
Servlet(s).
Jamie.
On Friday, 2 November 2012 14:23:44 UTC-4, Jeffrey Roe wrote:
So this will cause all files to be downloaded over and over again.
Is there a way to
While not answering your question exactly, I have seen posts around on
writing your own caching filter for Java, and they seem pretty easy to do.
And, it would then be really easy to invalidate your cached items.
However, as Jens says, putting all the request parameters into the URL is
not a
Correct me if I am wrong but it sounds like your idea will only have one
advantage over a traditional caching layer on the server: avoiding
serialization costs. You will still have deserialization costs which are
likely a lot more time consuming since they happen in javascript in the
browser
Thank you for your answers.
Take care;
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/MO4MKXsO0UwJ.
To post to this group, send email to
23 matches
Mail list logo
