Hi All,
I am using MVP in my application, my view Home is composed of:
HomeView: view Interface
HomeViewImpl: view implementation
HomeViewImpl.ui.xml: uibinder view implementation
HomeActivity: presenter
HomePlace: place
Home view has a graph and a celltable for showing some data. I create a
In my app GWT has a single RPC, I want to know if Atmosphere Async-IO can
help Multiplexing.
if possible, any resource would be great ?
Thank you!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
What worked for me was deleting the target folder.
If working with eclipse, it seems some of the run configuration arguments
are stored somewhere in the target folder.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from
I've switched to 2.7 and it writes only severe level messages to console by
default.
That's ok with me, but I can't change this behaviour. I tried adding the
following lines to my module file:
inherits name=com.google.gwt.logging.Logging/
set-property name=gwt.logging.enabled
Thanks Rogelio...
On Wednesday, January 14, 2015 at 7:30:03 PM UTC+5:30, Mohammed Sameen
wrote:
Hi Folks,
I am using GWT 2.6 to develop my web application.Since i am getting the
HTML prototype from UX/UI designer can i wrap the html directly into
uibinder in GWT?
- Is so,then how
I would like to extend ScriptInjector for having my own Javascript
injector. The current injector is injecting the script tag inside the head
element by default.
But I want to inject the script tag inside body element. And also I am
willing to have the callback functionality. Is there any
On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 12:30:09 AM UTC+1, Jim Douglas wrote:
It's not a complete showstopper; I did install the 2.7.0 SDK separately.
But it complicates our shared team configuration, which currently assumes
a working SDK at
Copy/paste? But may I ask you why body vs. head matters?
On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 2:03:07 PM UTC+1, Tham wrote:
I would like to extend ScriptInjector for having my own Javascript
injector. The current injector is injecting the script tag inside the head
element by default.
But I
On 1/20/2015 9:07 AM, Jim Douglas wrote:
Ok, done. It looks like the answer is probably no, it won't be updated.
Not seeing the issue (did a search on keywords 2.7 | kepler) or the
reply on the list to the effect that ... it won't be updated
Thx,
jec
On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 2:01:14
I don't think GWT will provide more advanced widgets in the future. The
problem is as soon as you start adding more advanced widgets, you will get
an endless list of use cases that users want to see on these widgets. So it
quickly becomes pretty work intensive but the GWT team at Google isn't
I'm using GWT for some time and I love it. The only thing that disappoints
me is its widgets.
They are unpleasant to look at and have limited functionality when you
compare them, for example, to Vaadin. Overall look and feel of a naked
GWT application is poor.
I spent some time reading about
Ok, done. It looks like the answer is probably no, it won't be updated.
On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 2:01:14 AM UTC-8, Thomas Broyer wrote:
On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 12:30:09 AM UTC+1, Jim Douglas wrote:
It's not a complete showstopper; I did install the 2.7.0 SDK separately.
There was no point in creating an issue; a request from last May to update
the SDK to 2.6.1 was never acted on, suggesting that this is a low- to
no-priority item.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-plugin-eclipse/JW2ANa9aVyE
I entered it here:
Here it is:
https://code.google.com/p/mvp4g/source/browse/trunk/sources/src/test/java/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/typemodel/TypeOracleStub.java
You always stub types with JGenericType; that is not correct.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Goktug Gokdogan gok...@google.com wrote:
I'm not going to
I have tried to create a JUnit test for the AssignabilityChecker class, but
that's not so easy. So I run the test from the JUnit test provided by the
mvp4g project. You can easily reproduce the error. Just check out the mvp4g
code from trunk, delete the AssignabilityChecker class and run the
Just following up on this. It turns out the problem was that I have some
native javascript that builds some elements after the page loads and these
elements are referenced in the gwt (that's where the null panel was showing
up). Even though this panel is referenced in a deferred block the page
This is great news and will enable more people to contribute to the
documentation in meaningful ways without needing to become fully versed in
Gerrit and the review system.
Any plans to remove the 'This is a beta version' from the header (main.tpl)
of the gwtproject.org site?
On Thursday,
This is great news and will enable more people to contribute to the
documentation in meaningful ways without needing to become fully versed in
Gerrit and the review system.
Any plans to remove the 'This is a beta version' from the header (main.tpl)
of the gwtproject.org site?
On Thursday,
I'm not going to come Munich..
TypeOracle getJavaLangObject shouldn't return java.lang.Object. From
the screenshots, it looks like your are using a stub implementation for
TypeOracle and that is probably doing the wrong thing.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Frank Hossfeld
Went through some best practices of web standards, they suggested that, it
is better to include the Javascript at the end of the body. Include the css
at the start of the head.
Based on this suggestion, I need to change the injection of Javascript into
the body element. It is possible using
Arrrgh, you are right. It works well up to version 2.6.1.
Am Mittwoch, 21. Januar 2015 01:26:22 UTC+1 schrieb Goktug Gokdogan:
Here it is:
https://code.google.com/p/mvp4g/source/browse/trunk/sources/src/test/java/com/google/gwt/dev/javac/typemodel/TypeOracleStub.java
You always stub types
I tried to reproduce the problem in GWT. I added following to
JParameterizedTypeTest
assertType(Object).isAssignableFrom(List);
assertType(Object).isAssignableFrom(Integer);
and both cases doesn't fail.
I also don't understand what you mean about converting java.lang.Object to
raw type.
There has been a few bug reports so it is very likely there is an issue
here, though I didn't have the opportunity to take a look.
Can you reproduce this with a simple app (e.g. SDK's Hello sample app) and
file a bug?
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 3:46 AM, Константин Милютин daml...@gmail.com
wrote:
23 matches
Mail list logo
