Re: compile to java 5 target bytecode, server side GWT(?)

2014-12-25 Thread Fabiano Tarlao
@jens thanks for replying. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send

compile to java 5 target bytecode, server side GWT(?)

2014-12-24 Thread Fabiano Tarlao
Hi, I need to deploy a gwt application on an infrastrutture running java5 jvm(s) :-( I have read that, starting from gwt 2.5, gwt libs have been compiled with a java6 bytecode target. My question is.. Has anyone tried to compile newer GWT versions (2.5,2.6,2.7), server side libs, with a java5

Re: compile to java 5 target bytecode, server side GWT(?)

2014-12-24 Thread Fabiano Tarlao
Thankyou, These backporting tools look interesting, wikipedia states that they convert java5-java4,3 I nave not found java6-java5 translator. I'll try them. Has anyone tried this yet? Just an idea, and just for curiosity, using a Gwt 2.7/2.6 application with 2.4 libs on the backend.. Is going

Re: compile to java 5 target bytecode, server side GWT(?)

2014-12-24 Thread Fabiano Tarlao
I'm sorry for the typos.. Tablet auto complete nightmare -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google Web Toolkit group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To

Re: GWT Benchmarks, Java Virtual Machine vs GWT+browser JsVM

2013-02-07 Thread Fabiano Tarlao
/ On Sunday, February 3, 2013 6:20:40 AM UTC+5:30, Fabiano Tarlao wrote: Hi, I have wrote a simple benchmark suite in java and I have run with JavaSE 1.7.0 and, thanks to GWT, I have run the same code on Firefox,Chrome,MSIE and Opera. My results, with the experiment details are published

Re: GWT Benchmarks, Java Virtual Machine vs GWT+browser JsVM

2013-02-07 Thread Fabiano Tarlao
Ouput is OBFUSCATED ;-) Il giorno giovedì 7 febbraio 2013 16:10:54 UTC+1, Fabiano Tarlao ha scritto: Hi, in fact I have not specied not used particular optimization arguments. I have not disabled CastChecking and ClassMetadata, and I have not explicitly set the optimization level

Re: GWT Benchmarks, Java Virtual Machine vs GWT+browser JsVM

2013-02-07 Thread Fabiano Tarlao
UTC-5, Fabiano Tarlao wrote: Hi, in fact I have not specied not used particular optimization arguments. I have not disabled CastChecking and ClassMetadata, and I have not explicitly set the optimization level (but the default is the maximum value). By using defaults my current

Re: GWT Benchmarks, Java Virtual Machine vs GWT+browser JsVM

2013-02-07 Thread Fabiano Tarlao
suggestions, please send me patches. Criticisms are welcome. Regards http://thegoodcodeinn.blogspot.it/2013/02/gwt-java-benchmarks-released.html http://code.google.com/p/gwt-java-benchmark/ Il giorno domenica 3 febbraio 2013 01:50:40 UTC+1, Fabiano Tarlao ha scritto: Hi, I have wrote a simple

Re: GWT Benchmarks, Java Virtual Machine vs GWT+browser JsVM

2013-02-07 Thread Fabiano Tarlao
Thanks Colin, I think that make sense removing cast checks and metadata in production, I have alway thought that getting cast errors in production is a good things, but it looks marginal. I think I'll add these optimizations in the next benchmarks. Regards Il giorno giovedì 7 febbraio 2013