will not get stuck in this
> loop - the optimization loop won't run at all (see one frame up,
> shouldOptimize will return false), and you'll instead experience a
> stackoverflow at runtime.
>
> I didn't continue investigation of the problem further yet, but the linked
> ticket
I just found an infinite loop while running the GWT compiler.
There was a trivial bug in my code which resulted in an infinite loop at
*runtime*. This is a method that was calling itself recursively. It was
inside a generic class, and the method had a single line that was something
like this:
One thing I really like about using JSON for my message formats is that
they are human readable (YMMV).
If you're wondering whether a problem is client side or server side, or
when you just want to know exactly what information the client was given,
being able to read the content of messages can
Having readable network messages is very useful for debugging.
It's also easy to include more data in a GWT RPC messages than you really
need unless you're careful with it.
Regards,
Paul
On Fri, 21 Jul 2023, 15:43 Ralph Fiergolla,
wrote:
> I think I asked the question before: as a long-term
On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 7:45 PM eliasbala...@gmail.com <
eliasbala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> During development,
> with "SuperDevMode"+"Jetty" and "Google Plugin for Eclipse",
> GWT client-side code compilation (including the nocache.js files) is done
> at runtime by DevMode.
>
> Any other scenario
Would it be plausible to split GWT into two projects - one as it is now but
without Jetty built in, and another that adds the bits relating to Jetty?
Then the GWT Jetty project could be maintained by those that require it.
Paul
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Vassilis - I don't use the bookmarklet. It may still work (I don't know)
but it's not needed in recent GWT versions. I just refresh my browser and
it recompiles automatically if anything has changed.
Paul
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
I used the built in Jetty server until a year or so ago. Occasionally I
have to use the older version in development as we haven't upgraded
everybody in production to the new version yet.
>From a development perspective, I find running a separate code server and
Jetty to be much more productive.
Try the shared version instead of the client versionn:
com.google.gwt.core.shared.GWT
Paul
On Sat, 29 Jun 2019, 14:20 Evan Ferrell, wrote:
> I am receiving the attached error when trying to run JUnit. Please advise.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
I haven't seen proper stack traces in my app without emulation in Chrome,
even in older versions of GWT.
Is it possible there's a trick to making it show the real line instead of
the function start, rather than a bug in 2.8.2?
Paul
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
I don't think you're showing us enough code. The exception indicates
something is calling toString() on a null object, but there's nothing in
what you've shown us that calls a toString() method.
Try compiling in pretty mode with full stack traces. You'll see better
error information.
Paul
On
I always deploy a version compiled with emulated stack traces alongside the
regular version so that if a problem can be replicated, I can get a proper
stack trace.
But I still share your pain. Trying to work out which line of obfuscated
JavaScript could possibly have given a null pointer
You can store the file on the server in a temporary area, returning a key
to the UI. Then, when the user is ready to submit the lot, the UI sends the
file's key to the server as well as the other data.
The server can then move the file data to a permanent home, or mark it as
permanent.
Paul
Check to see if you're mixing GWT versions. Maybe more than one GWT jar
file in your path.
Paul
On Fri, 4 May 2018, 16:09 Rachel, wrote:
> I couldn't find another post with this same error but if there is one I
> apologize.
> We are moving a project from GWT 2.7 to GWT
We do both: release compiles have a permutation with native stack traces
for normal use, plus a "debug" version which includes emulated stack
traces. We deploy both of them, but don't tell real users about the debug
version unless there's a good reason to do so.
Sometimes it's useful for us to be
I'm not a security expert either, but doesn't https stop a
man-in-the-middle attack?
So the only way to cause you to download the wrong thing is to compromise
gwtproject.org, in which case they could just put the sha1 for their
altered file on there. That's much easier than creating an
You can send the whole stack trace to the server and use
StackTraceDeobfuscator to work out the real locations.
See this recent thread:
https://groups.google.com/forum/m/#!topic/Google-Web-Toolkit/z4Rg1G2MgCQ
Paul
On 14 Jun 2017 7:06 pm, "Harry Wagner" wrote:
> Is
We've done this for a long time now, and it does indeed work well. You
don't get the exact line numbers, but rather the first line number of the
method it's in, but that's usually enough. We also have an extra
permutation for a "debug" build that sets compiler.stackMode to emulated. I
set it up so
As a heavy user of GWT-RPC in a large app, I've become disillusioned with
it. That's for three reasons:
- I often need to see what data is being sent, and it's just not very good
for that. It makes debugging harder than it could be.
- it's not good for communicating from a mobile app.
- it's
Have you tried modifying/simplifying the JSON to see what your odd
behaviour is sensitive to?
Paul
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Looks to me like this bug:
https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/14430/
which was (coincidentally?) mentioned today here:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit-contributors/33Zw3nP3q7o/eUSj5-eKEwAJ
Paul
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Freddy Boucher
on August 31, and set the month
to September, then you find you are on October 1.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Daniel Kurka <kurka.dan...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Does this code do the same thing in 2.7?
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:41 PM Paul Robinson <ukcue...@gmail.com>
You don't say what part of this you think is a bug. I presume it's the fact
that Aug 31 plus one month is Oct 1. If so, this is not a bug.
Adding one month should do literally that, so you get September 31. But
there are only 30 days in September, so this automatically becomes October
1.
Paul
On 13 Jul 2016 9:17 a.m., "Kay Pac" wrote:
>
> Will the gwt serialization mechanism used in GWT-RPC remain? GWT object
serialization has been plugged into the atmosphere (realtime
communication/websockets) GWT extension. It would be useful to know if we
should migrate away
GWT RPC may not be supported beyond GWT 2.8, so I'd be wary of using it for
a new project now.
Paul
On 19 Feb 2016 8:17 p.m., "Sam Wootton" wrote:
> Thank you Gilberto, good advice. Im not sure it will reduce work or
> achieve the 'minimal' server rewrite (or rather
On 11 Jan 2016 11:13 a.m., "vaibhav gwt" wrote:
> Just upgraded to 2.6.1 and ran into the following when trying to
> build with gwt-log-3.1.3.jar.
Your gwt-log is too old. See the compatibility information here:
https://github.com/fredsa/gwt-log/wiki/GettingStarted
It's not a bug. Chrome and Firefox removed support for the API that classic
dev mode required. You can install an old browser, or embrace the future
and go with super dev mode.
There have been lots of discussions about this here before; the group
archives will explain all the details if you want
You appear to be adding an item without also creating that item. That
suggests the item already exists, and is possibly already displayed. You
can't have the same widget appearing more than once. That may be your
problem.
Paul
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 9:02 AM, wrote:
> Hello all,
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Colin Alworth wrote:
> If I could be permitted to slight restate what Julien just said: We will
> make a note of it, as we have done in the past, such as when the default
> moved from java6 to java7:
>
Thanks for the clarification Thomas.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Thomas Broyer <t.bro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 at 1:54:40 PM UTC+1, Paul Robinson wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Colin Alworth <ni
Is it intentional/necessary that gwt-servlet.jar is compiled for Java 7 and
not Java 6?
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Daniel Kurka wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we just finished testing for GWT 2.8.0-beta1. You can either download it
> from goo.gl/62SeR5 or from maven central.
>
>
Speaking for myself, a GWT 2.8.0 release that works, but uses too much
memory compiling code, to be followed by GWT 2.8.1 with the memory fix, is
better than waiting for an unknown amount of time until JDT is fixed.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 8:46 AM, 'Goktug Gokdogan' via GWT Contributors <
Have you installed ant? Have you googled that error message? For example,
googling the error message gives this as the first result:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9262712/ant-is-not-recognized-as-an-internal-or-external-command
Paul
On 12 Sep 2015 5:56 pm, "Priyanka"
I suspect most people here just haven't quite realised the magnitude of
what's planned. The plans are quite reasonable for anybody that can start
from scratch (which doesn't include me). Anybody invested in GWT will have
a problem. That includes Google, although there are no obvious plans for a
All our developers have new core i7 machines with 8gb of RAM
That's not enough.
We used to use 16GB RAM for developers, but it was too constraining. We now
use 32GB 64 bit machines. Having fast hardware makes a significant
difference too.
Paul
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Victor Krausser
The GWT Meetup 2015 videos are very interesting.
I can see why the proposals for GWT 3.0 have been made. However, we should
be clear about the fact that GWT 3.0 is not just going to break a few
little things that can easily be fixed, but break things to the point that
it's a completely
On Saturday, 13 June 2015 12:18:37 UTC+1, Thomas Broyer wrote:
it's expected that you could future-proof your application in GWT 2.8.
Yes, except that if you're heavily invested in GWT widgets, then
future-proofing means switching to a different rendering library and so
almost a complete
On 10 Mar 2015 18:56, Manuel develop.m...@gmail.com wrote:
// Copy day/month/year to the datebox
startDate.setYear(selectedDate.getYear());
startDate.setMonth(selectedDate.getMonth());
startDate.setDate(selectedDate.getDate());
Perhaps you
+1
This would be a breaking change because all gwt package names should
change. But it is probably worthwhile to have a Google-free name and brand.
I think this appraisal of the website and especially in comparison to the
scala-js website is correct. It's probably painful after the recent
I don't have an answer for you, but here's an interesting description of
how Google's Inbox uses Java as a base for building Android, web (via gwt)
and iOS (via j2objc) apps. Three separate native apps sharing about two
thirds of the source code.
If you're using eclipse and chrome, then sdbg is good. It's not perfect,
but it is *much* better than browsing Java source and setting break points
in the browser.
Paul
On 3 Nov 2014 17:49, David Hoffer dhoff...@gmail.com wrote:
I like where you might be going with your last paragraph (the
You're using integer arithmetic for a sum that overflows beyond the maximum
positive value for an integer. So 1000*60*60*24*30 is negative.
You could try 1000L*60*60*24*30
Paul
On 31 Jul 2014 01:53, Tom henry...@gmail.com wrote:
This is very weird. Ok, the below code works fine
public void
Take a look at http://eemi2010.github.io/gwt-tour/
Paul
On 14 Jul 2014 08:25, Vasu pandurang.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am also looking for the same. Let me know if you come across any
such a library.
[image: Pandurang Patil on about.me]
Pandurang Patil
about.me/pandurangpatil
How does this compare or relate to https://github.com/daveho/AceGWT ?
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Alain Ekambi jazzmatad...@gmail.com
wrote:
The link s about the open source project.
The demo is here : http://ahome-it.github.io/ahome-client-io/
The demo also show another library called
It's probably the line number of the start of the method the exception
occurred in.
Paul
On 11 Jul 2014 22:36, 'Thomas Lacroix' via Google Web Toolkit
google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com wrote:
Hello,
While in production mode, I would like to pinpoint the root cause of a
given Trowable.
Do you really need all 23 permissions several times per hour? Building in
parallel is a good idea, but avoiding unnecessary permissions is easy and
makes a big difference while developing.
Paul
Good afternoon,
we're using GWT in our application (to be precise, not the vanilla, but
SGWT) and what
Unless each rpc call sends a large amount of data, chaining the rpc calls
in the way you suggest will be much slower than sending a single ArrayList.
It will also be more complicated code.
So in general, you should send an ArrayList in a single rpc call. You'd
have to have a good reason to do it
On 24 May 2014 05:03, Frank Ren renfeng...@gmail.com wrote:
It's been two years. And, I was just push into this problem by Chrome
dropping support for GWT plugin. i.e. I have to downgrade Firefox to
version 24, or to struggle with super dev mode.
However, both running a Firefox version 24, and
You could let them write Java code instead and run it in the server only
using BeanShell2. Then the syntax and interoperability issues go away. But
you have to send results to the client rather than calculating directly on
the client.
HTH
Paul
--
You received this message because you are
In the callback for the click on the hyperlink, disable the hyperlink so it
can't be clicked twice. In your RPC callback, you can enable it again in
the onFailure method. Presumably it should stay disabled in your onSuccess
method.
That will stop people from asking for two games with a double
The problem is this code:
Date date = new Date();
date.setYear(Integer.valueOf(y) - 1900);
date.setMonth(Integer.valueOf(m) - 1);
date.setDate(Integer.valueOf(d));
You found this bug when you ran it yesterday, October 31st. That's
pertinent because the first line above creates a new date
This discussion has covered what the general rules for dropping support for
browsers, APIs and JVMs should be. That's a good thing, but what I would really
like is for GWT to specify the actual dates when it is expected that GWT will
no longer support particular runtime server JVM versions and
Your English is very good. No problems there!
I don't know the answer to your problem exactly as you're written it, but you
could possibly achieve the same thing a different way. Take a look at the tree
dag-and-drop method done here:
https://code.google.com/p/gwt-dnd-tree/
It indicates the
Use com.google.gwt.core.shared.GWT.isClient()
Paul
On 07/06/13 15:34, Magnus wrote:
Hi,
my chess application should trust only the server time.
However, I have a shared class that is used both on server and client.
Within this class I determine the current time by creating a new Date
The date doesn't actually get changed. What's happening is that a
java.util.Date represents an instance in time. Viewed from different timezones,
that instance in time can be at different times of day and even a different
day. But it's still the same instance in time.
To avoid this, you might
While it's good to get rid of long-deprecated things, is it really a good idea
to do that in a point release like this? Shouldn't it wait until GWT 2.6? I'm
thinking in particular of GWTShell and GWTCompiler.
Paul
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Even better than a command line switch would be a deferred binding switch. Then
you could compile and deploy something with and without experimental APIs at
the same time. If something breaks you can tell customers to switch to using a
different host page that uses the version compiled without
Your fooModel is a private member and nothing ever sets its value. The
constructor takes a FooModel, but doesn't use it.
Paul
On 24/12/12 03:57, vitaliy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have a checked exception FooModelValidationException which is declared in
interface of an RPC service
ListDataProvider.getList() returns a list implementation that is not
GWT-serializable.
https://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideServerCommunication#DevGuideSerializableTypes
If you look at the exception you received, it should tell you (in its own
idiosyncratic way) that
On 14/12/12 11:24, Thomas Broyer wrote:
and there's also the issue with GWT-RPC serialization policies that make
using SuperDevMode tricky (apparently, I don't use RPC).
Tricky is too strong a word for it. It only takes a small amount of code, so
that the RPC servlet's
I have about 250kloc, lots of RPC and no generators or UI binder.
With decent hardware, a recompile is about 7-8 seconds. With a 3-4 year old
computer, it was taking about 20 seconds.
Paul
On 14/11/12 14:34, Paul Stockley wrote:
Our project is about 35,000 lines of client and server code. We
On 09/11/12 10:01, Thomas Broyer wrote:
no decision were made, except for welcoming JetBrains as a new SC member.
That's a good example of something that should have been posted to the SC group.
Paul
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web
Vaadin provide commercial GWT support:
https://vaadin.com/gwt
Paul
On 05/10/12 13:53, vinayak wrote:
I understand this is a old post and I have same question in Oct 2012. I am
from similar kind of company. Is there anybody who provides commercial
support for GWT ?
On Friday, April
In a word: yes.
You also need to decide whether to use a third party library like Sencha's GXT
and SmartClient's SmartGWT. Personally, I chose vanilla GWT and have never once
regretted choosing GWT or choosing not to use an external widget library.
Paul
On 05/10/12 16:53, Charlie Youakim
You don't show the Polygon class, but from the error it looks like you haven't
provided a zero-argument constructor. It must have one, even if it's private
and you never call it. GWT-RPC needs it for anything that it serializes.
Paul
On 21/09/12 15:40, coffeMan wrote:
I created a class that
TextBox is for single line text. Use TextArea for multiline text.
On 20/09/12 10:16, tong123123 wrote:
as shown in attached ContetWithReturnKey1.png, the content has \n before
setText (content\ncontent), but after setText and then getText() again, the
\n is disappear(contentcontent)!!
How
One question missing from the survey that would have been interesting is the
number of people using Maven with GWT.
On 19/09/12 14:23, Joonas Lehtinen wrote:
What is your opinion on the future of GWT?
How should GWT develop?
What technologies should it better support?
...
We all would like
I went looking for the *.rpc.log files that get generated during the GWT
compile yesterday, only to find that they don't get generated by default any
more. After a bit of digging in the source code, it seems that you have to turn
them on now with an argument of -logLevel DEBUG to the GWT
See https://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideCodeSplitting
Paul
On 18/09/12 13:37, Néstor Boscán wrote:
Hi
I have a big application that is generating a 3 MB JS. Is there a way to
divide this JS in multiple modules so they can be loaded if needed?
Regards,
Néstor
For the purposes of getting stack traces, SuperDevMode is the same as
production mode. For this, you have two options:
(1) Deobfuscate your stack traces on the server (see StackTraceDeobfuscator)
(2) Emulated stack traces
When you do either or both of these, you still don't get something quite
If you look carefully at the source code, you'll see that there are two methods
called addAndReplaceElement(Widget, Element), it's just that one of them uses
com.google.gwt.dom.client.Element and the other uses
com.google.gwt.user.client.Element
It's the com.google.gwt.user.client.Element
Maybe you should get more RAM...4GB isn't a lot when running all the things you
need for GWT development. Alternatively, run some (or even all) of the required
processes on another computer.
Paul
On 06/09/12 05:33, Niraj Salot wrote:
Hi Members,
Thanks for all your suggestion/comments.
We
One of the nice things about SuperDevMode in chrome is that as you step through
it in the chrome debugger, you can see exactly what the browser does and when
because the browser display updates as you step through your code. In other
words, if you want to know what's actually happening, you can
Try calling scrollToBottom after the event loop has finished by running it
inside a call to Scheduler.get().scheduleDeferred(...)
Paul
On 16/08/12 06:15, Magnus wrote:
Hello,
I have a CellTable within a ScrollPanel with a fixed number of rows (40).
Whenever the CellTable is filled with
I don't understand why so many people are using chrome for dev mode. It's much
slower in dev mode than other browsers. On Linux, I'd use Firefox. But if you
use super dev mode instead, then chrome is good.
Paul
On 11/08/12 20:50, Jens wrote:
see:
It's only safe for the browser to cache the file *because* it's got a name that
changes every time something changes. Setting the name to something fixed would
defeat this.
Paul
On 10/08/12 08:51, wahaha wrote:
there are 3 files after GWT's compiling:
hosted.html
moduleName.nocache.js
On 10/08/12 21:46, xxJohnnyxx wrote:
Hello, I want to connect to a mysql server from the server side of my GWT
code, like this:
Caused by: java.security.AccessControlException: access denied
(java.lang.RuntimePermission modifyThreadGroup)
at
Have you enabled source map support in chrome? Click the settings cog/wheel
thing in the bottom-right corner, and tick Enable source maps.
Also, you must compile while the developer tools tab is open, or else it won't
show the java source code.
HTH
Paul
On 08/08/12 08:42, Adolfo Panizo Touzon
Search for super dev mode. It's available now in GWT 2.5RC1
Paul
On 01/08/12 15:23, Dieter K wrote:
Dear all,
This is hopefully starting a discussion that results in a GWT feature
request. Maybe/probably this was suggested before and is currently in the
works or it was rejected -- then I
On 31/07/12 09:24, Rana wrote:
Hello Jens,
But, what if I don't want to use neither JSP nor PHP. Is there a way of doing
it using GWT, or JavaScript?
That'll be the whatever in Jens' email. You can generate a host html page
with whatever server-side technology you're using. If you have a
[ERROR] Line 13: No source code is available for type
com.ag.sapwidgets.server.ExportDataToExcel; did you forget to inherit a
required module?
This is the problem. You are trying to convert to javascript the server class
ExportDataToExcel. Either its package should be added to the set
On 17/07/12 15:07, Venkat wrote:
how can I test my server side logic in GWT.
GWT is client-side technology. To test server code, set up tests that are
independent of GWT. That is, just create regular junit tests that check your
server classes work properly.
Paul
--
You received this message
(RemoteTestRunner.java:390)
at
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:197)
Thanks,
On Tuesday, July 17, 2012 10:20:57 AM UTC-4, Paul Robinson wrote:
On 17/07/12 15:07, Venkat wrote:
how can I test my server side logic in GWT.
GWT is client-side
On 17/07/12 16:24, Venkat wrote:
I have removed the client side code from the test case, the exception is
gone. But I got one exception that is below. I am guessing this is because I
did not specified the test folder in my Module. If yes, can you please tell
me how can I do that. Usually
wrote:
I have done that, now it is giving me the inherit issue, can you tell me I
can inherit all the classes that I want to inherit like this.
Can I use * to inherit all.
inherits name=com.google.gwt.* /
On Tuesday, July 17, 2012 12:14:52 PM UTC-4, Paul Robinson wrote:
On 17/07/12 16:24
On 14/07/12 19:34, Brian Slesinsky wrote:
On Thursday, July 5, 2012 9:42:26 AM UTC-7, Thomas Broyer wrote:
On Thursday, July 5, 2012 10:28:06 AM UTC+2, monkeyboy wrote:
Thanks Thomas for the clarification.
I now understand that I must have two servers running one for
.
Daniel
(And sorry for the late answer.)
Am Dienstag, 3. Juli 2012 23:41:08 UTC+2 schrieb Paul Robinson:
On 03/07/12 21:41, Daniel F. wrote:
Am Dienstag, 3. Juli 2012 14:42:11 UTC+2 schrieb PhiLho:
On 30/06/2012 16:37, Daniel F. wrote:
I need to parse serialized
On 11/06/12 12:01, Thomas Broyer wrote:
How about customizing the CrossSiteIframeLinker instead?
Customizing either the computeUrlForResource or loadExternalStylesheets to no
longer be relative to the module base url (but rather to, say, the host
page base url).
Or if you need it to be
On 03/07/12 21:41, Daniel F. wrote:
Am Dienstag, 3. Juli 2012 14:42:11 UTC+2 schrieb PhiLho:
On 30/06/2012 16:37, Daniel F. wrote:
I need to parse serialized *java.util.Date* values in Python. Where can
I find information
on the timestamp that represents date and time in the
On 23/06/12 12:30, Jens wrote:
I think currently the codeserver only serves the compiled JavaScript of your
app. So you still have to use a server that serves your server side code.
No, it serves source too. As Brian said, use -src arguments to the code server.
3.) copy your apps host html
con Sparrow http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig
Il giorno giovedě 14 giugno 2012, alle ore 11:33, Paul Robinson ha scritto:
On 13/06/12 18:53, Andrea Boscolo wrote:
I can confirm that copying the CodeServer's .gwt.rpc files in the local war
dir, works but it's a pain: every time they change
On 15/06/12 04:10, jfiallo wrote:
I'm fairly new to developing with GWT. I was wondering if there's a way to
'patch' an existing gwt application, that is: update just a portion of an app
that a customer might already be using (ex. a java class that was modified).
The simple answer is no. It's
On 13/06/12 18:53, Andrea Boscolo wrote:
I can confirm that copying the CodeServer's .gwt.rpc files in the local war
dir, works but it's a pain: every time they change, they need to be copied.
There's an alternative to copying gwt.rpc files. I've changed my app so that
when it looks for the
The new superDevMode is *very* impressive. Well done!
I don't know how unusual my use-case is, but I require custom handling of some
CSS files to make things work properly. For example, I allow customers to skin
my app, and that requires CSS in a database. So there's a CSS file referenced
in
to the module base url, add a linker to emit
the appropriate CSS files in the module output dir (where the Super Dev Mode's will find
them).
On Monday, June 11, 2012 12:16:19 PM UTC+2, Paul Robinson wrote:
The new superDevMode is *very* impressive. Well done!
I don't know how unusual my
I've just tried SuperDevMode for the first time. I have around 250KLOC, of
which around 200KLOC are translated to javascript.
The code server reported 3 minutes for the initial compile (with 2
permutations), then 37 seconds for the first compile from the browser, and then
consistently 18-19
I'm not using UiBinder or Gin.
I am using GWT RPC, I18N and ImageResource.
I have approximately:
- 100 methods across several ClientBundles returning an ImageResource.
- 700 I18N methods spread over about 30 interfaces (my initial 2 permutations
were for the default locale)
- for GWT RPC, I
You can deobfuscate non-emulated stack traces. Check out
com.google.gwt.logging.server.StackTraceDeobfuscator
You need to arrange for the symbol maps created at compile time to be available.
Note that you can also set up another permutation so that you have emulated
stack traces or not, and
You can add a MouseOverHandler to find out when the mouse becomes over a
widget, and then show a pop-up menu inside the handler. If each item can have a
different menu, then maybe you need the handler to ask the item for its menu.
If you're using widgets that don't have an addMouseOverHandler
On 30/04/12 15:23, Piergrossi, Mark J wrote:
Alan:
Just wanted to say thank you man. The plug-in works great. It is a shame that
Google couldn't create these in a timely manner. Your effort is greatly
appreciated -- especially from those of us that have to get real work done.
Alan is a
1 - 100 of 424 matches
Mail list logo