Hi,
Google developer docs mention the GWT showcase app as a working example for
returning a HTML snapshot upon escaped_fragment request:
https://developers.google.com/webmasters/ajax-crawling/docs/faq?hl=en#inaction
However, the
mentioned
will there be any disadvantages or any side effects by
using it.
On Wednesday, 6 May 2015 01:33:14 UTC+5:30, Robert Hoffmann wrote:
Limit your permutations by being more stringent, e.g.
set-property name=user.agent value=safari /
On May 5, 2015 3:26:56 PM GMT+02:00, Kishore Palakollu
en_EN
user.agent safari
Devmode:devmode.js
Thanks Regards,
kishore.
On Thursday, 4 December 2014 19:24:48 UTC+5:30, Robert Hoffmann wrote:
@thomas
thank you, that helped me to reduce the permutations to one.
For the record, compilation-mappings.txt contained multiple cache.js
file
entries
Ok. Just for the record.
The GWT plugin that comes with IntelliJ 14 does not use CodeServer. It does
have a Super Dev Mode option, but then does not allow any extra
parameters like launchDir or
src. http://stackoverflow.com/a/27571401/1417396
Most importantly however the deferred binding bug
Yes. GWT 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT fixes this problem!
However under 2.7.0 I was using com.google.gwt.dev.codeserver.CodeServer
with the -src attribute. Is there a way to include external source paths
with the new SDM ?
Thank you
Robert
On Sunday, March 1, 2015 at 1:47:48 PM UTC+1, Jens wrote:
Please
is not listed above either.
Thank you,
Robert
On 02/03/15 16:51, Thomas Broyer wrote:
On Monday, March 2, 2015 at 4:09:08 PM UTC+1, Robert Hoffmann wrote:
Yes. GWT 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT fixes this problem!
However under 2.7.0 I was using
com.google.gwt.dev.codeserver.CodeServer
17:20, Thomas Broyer wrote:
DevMode vs. CodeServer.
On Monday, March 2, 2015 at 5:14:41 PM UTC+1, Robert Hoffmann wrote:
This is the output I get when launching SDM from IntelliJ IDEA (14):
Unknown argument: -launcherDir
Google Web Toolkit 2.8.0-SNAPSHOT
DevMode
I am using super dev mode (SDM) with GWT 2.7.0.
I use the following module code to create a new property (user.agent.ie8)
based on the user.agent property:
!-- !!! define a pure ie8 variable (no fallback from ie9) --
define-property name=user.agent.ie8 values=true,false/
!
Petty only that using the dev mode server, does not support multiple
source paths? I imagine this is on the roadmap.
On 04/12/14 16:28, Thomas Broyer wrote:
On Thursday, December 4, 2014 3:17:42 PM UTC+1, Robert Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
I have a question to the workflow I have adopted
Hi,
I have a question to the workflow I have adopted, and would be grateful for
your input. Are you running into the same problem or is there a better way?
So, I develop a number of projects (e.g. prj) that share a common library
(e.g. lib) which I also develop. They are in independent maven
Hi,
Is there a way to see which properties cause the permutations?
(I'm using GWT 2.7.0)
best, Robert
On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 8:53:22 PM UTC+2, John Stalcup wrote:
I can explain what's going here I think.
Incremental compile is made possible by storing and reusing data in a new
:-)
On Thursday, December 4, 2014 10:15:36 AM UTC+1, Robert Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to see which properties cause the permutations?
(I'm using GWT 2.7.0)
When compiling your project, you should have
a compilation-mappings.txt file generated next to the *.nocache.js.
--
You received
invocation though?
Presumably next time around it's going to get a different temp dir,
and this fill will get recreated again.
Have to confess - I don't fully follow what this file does though, and
why we need to manually edit it
On Thursday, 4 December 2014 15:54:48 UTC+2, Robert Hoffmann wrote
, 2014 3:43:11 PM GMT+01:00, Rob Walker
piste.shred...@googlemail.com wrote:
OK - I know I'm being exceptionally dumb here, but won't that also
limit a
production build to that 1 permutation?
On Thursday, 4 December 2014 16:06:23 UTC+2, Robert Hoffmann wrote:
The mappings file only reports what
regards,
Robert
On Thursday, July 24, 2014 2:10:50 AM UTC+2, Robert Hoffmann wrote:
I am not clear how to enable code splitting, when using dependency
injection.
At the beginning of my app I load a gin module to setup bindings, e.g.
bind(WidgetView.class).to(WidgetViewImpl.class
There is a bug report on
thishttps://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=377913
Do you use the AdBlock plugin?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
I am not clear how to enable code splitting, when using dependency
injection.
At the beginning of my app I load a gin module to setup bindings, e.g.
bind(WidgetView.class).to(WidgetViewImpl.class).in(Singleton.class);
But by doing so I introduce a dependency to WidgetViewImpl.class which
Today it happened again.
- It definitely is NOT the browser cache.
- I redeployed various times, without success.
- From the appengine console I deleted the active instance without
success.
Then finally I incremented the version (appengine-web-app.xml), redeployed
and switched the
On 09.04.13 10:15, Jens wrote:
Never used AppEngine but the first two things I would check are:
1.) Caching issue for module.nocache.js so that the browser has the
old one cached and requests an old hash.cache.html file which does
not exist anymore.
I wish - I cleared the cache and tried
Hi,
Every now and then when uploading an update of my GWT application to
appengine, the uploaded app seems in an inconsistent state, i.e. the
Module.Cache.html file is not found.
e.g. App not working, Browser console says
'/Module/C96DE337B74EEDDBD2CF70FC4C65827B.cache.html not found'
This
://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Robert Hoffmann, Phd
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google
Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
+1
Same problem since GWT 2.5 (also with GWT 2.5.1-rc1)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
ERROR: Deferred binding failed for
'com.google.gwt.useragent.client.UserAgentAsserter.UserAgentProperty';
expect subsequent failures
ERROR: Error while executing the JavaScript provider for property
'user.agent'
com.google.gwt.core.client.JavaScriptException: (TypeError)
-toolkit?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
Robert Hoffmann, Phd
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Google
Web Toolkit group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
Every now and then when uploading an update of my GWT application to appengine,
the uploaded app seems in an inconsistent state, i.e. the Module.Cache.html
file is not found.
e.g. App not working, Browser console says
'/Module/C96DE337B74EEDDBD2CF70FC4C65827B.cache.html not found'
I
Hi,
I am currently using:
- PlaceHistoryMapper historyMapper =
GWT.create(AppPlaceHistoryMapper.class);
- @WithTokenizers({FrontPlace.Tokenizer.class, ...}) on PlaceHistoryMapper
I'd like to use now hash bang tokens for places to support bot crawling.
What is the best way (minimal change) to
Thanks for the quick reply.
Some of my thoughts regarding the different options.
1) @Prefix
- Since the hash bang is part of a a global scheme and the @Prefix a
personal attribute of a Place, I don't feel comfortable to add it there.
2) Extending DefaultHistorian
- This does not 'force' the
27 matches
Mail list logo