voice
matters. Jump right into the Future of GWT Survey 2013:
http://bit.ly/GWT2013
If you did not see the 2012 results, take a look the full report:
https://vaadin.com/gwt/report-2012
Thanks!
- Joonas / Vaadin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Would you like to contribute to the direction of GWT?
It takes just 10 minutes to tell about your preference on where GWT should
be going next and what are the most important problems to fix. Your voice
matters. Jump right into the Future of GWT Survey 2013:
http://bit.ly/GWT2013
If you did
The Future of GWT study is now available
at https://vaadin.com/gwt/report-2012
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/xKLDkb3rgD4J.
To
Id be interested too.
GWT is so interesting, as a small team it has let us do so much so
much easier.
Its hard to say where to draw the line in regards to features and what
is core
Id like too see WebGL support at some point - possibly via a canvas-
esq widget. But how to do this in a
Results will be published on Tue. Sorry for it taking this long.
Id be interested too.
GWT is so interesting, as a small team it has let us do so much so
much easier.
Its hard to say where to draw the line in regards to features and what
is core
Id like too see WebGL support at some point
It has takes a bit of time to compile the report. Sorry. The survey results
will be published on Dec 4th on vaadin.com/blog
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
where can we see the results?
On Wednesday, 19 September 2012 15:23:24 UTC+2, Joonas Lehtinen wrote:
What is your opinion on the future of GWT?
How should GWT develop?
What technologies should it better support?
...
We all would like to get answers to these questions, right? To do so, we
Done!, hey ! you don't have Uruguay in you country select box :(
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/QAtatRSv2TIJ.
To post to this
have the results of this survey been posted anywhere? if not, any ETA on
when they might be?
much thanks!
On Wednesday, September 19, 2012 6:23:24 AM UTC-7, Joonas Lehtinen wrote:
What is your opinion on the future of GWT?
How should GWT develop?
What technologies should it better
Totally agreed with this thread.
On Thursday, September 20, 2012 9:58:58 PM UTC+8, Oleg K. wrote:
I've post my answers to survey. Here what was not included.
1) I use maven (with gwt-maven-plugin which is very-very good). With that
plugin I think meny maven users are happy. The only real
I totally agree with Andrei. It is an excellent idea.This will increase
developers overall productivity. This is a must. I can offer myself to help
building that kind of marketplace.
Quinta-feira, 20 de Setembro de 2012 0:51:53 UTC+1, Andrei escreveu:
I hope we can also avoid the other
On Friday, September 28, 2012 3:59:33 PM UTC+2, João Cavaleiro wrote:
I totally agree with Andrei. It is an excellent idea.This will increase
developers overall productivity. This is a must. I can offer myself to help
building that kind of marketplace.
You mean, something like
Hum, didn't know about them. Something like Google Play should be very much
appreciated.
Sexta-feira, 28 de Setembro de 2012 15:13:13 UTC+1, Thomas Broyer escreveu:
On Friday, September 28, 2012 3:59:33 PM UTC+2, João Cavaleiro wrote:
I totally agree with Andrei. It is an excellent
@Thomas,
Those projects seem to be dead also.
2012/9/28 João Cavaleiro jmscavale...@gmail.com
Hum, didn't know about them. Something like Google Play should be very
much appreciated.
Sexta-feira, 28 de Setembro de 2012 15:13:13 UTC+1, Thomas Broyer escreveu:
On Friday, September 28, 2012
On Friday, September 28, 2012 4:56:21 PM UTC+2, nino wrote:
@Thomas,
Those projects seem to be dead also.
Absolutely.
Which means that I don't think yet another one would succeed where the
others failed, *even* on that's official and linked from GWT's web site.
--
You received this
Am I reading too much into the fact that the GWT survey ends on the
Vaadin.com/gwt page?
With Google pushing GWT into the wild, is
https://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/ still the most central place for
GWT development?
--
-- A. Stevko
===
If everything seems under control, you're
up with The Future of GWT survey. Please help us understand:
- How should GWT develop?
- What technologies should it better support?
- What are best practices within the community?
- What is your opinion on the future of GWT?
Information is king - So once we collect all the data
I second the call for reducing compile times and making it more extendable.
The slow compile/link times are a major impediment to development. Some of
our developers are in favor of dumping GWT in favor of native javascript
toolkits because the slow dev mode and compile/link times are impeding
Thanks for the feedback Chris! One of the nice things about doing a survey
like this is the conversation that springs up around it, and you make a
great point.
On Wednesday, September 19, 2012 7:06:08 PM UTC+2, Chris Lercher wrote:
Please excuse me for this negative feedback, but in my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cool, thanks for the pointer. I knew about Xtend, but didn't put see
the implications of its compiling to Java for GWT development.
I'm quite happy with Scala in general, but something statically-typed
and less verbose than Java would be very
I've post my answers to survey. Here what was not included.
1) I use maven (with gwt-maven-plugin which is very-very good). With that
plugin I think meny maven users are happy. The only real problem is that it
cant' autoreload dependencies so GWT Dev Mode console should always be
restarted
Crap. I also forgot about that. I want to go back.
On Wednesday, September 19, 2012 10:50:05 AM UTC-5, Dave Laycock wrote:
I wish I could change my responses. I forgot about the single biggest
improvement I would like to see on the long term roadmap: support for Java
8 language features
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We are at my organization. We don't love Maven, but it fits with our
infrastructure here, and we prefer the declarative style to a
scripting-oriented one.
On 09/19/2012 10:10 AM, Paul Robinson wrote:
One question missing from the survey that would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I would /love/ to be able to use a language other than Java - in
particular, Scala - for GWT development. On my project, we use Scala
for all our other JVM work, and it's been a massive boilerplate
killer, plus easily graspable by
Sounds like you're set with Scala, but another high advanced JVM language
option is XTend (http://www.eclipse.org/xtend/).
They recently added GWT support:
http://blog.efftinge.de/2012/08/gwt-programming-with-xtend.html
On Thursday, September 20, 2012 1:23:06 PM UTC-5, Clint Gilbert wrote:
Sounds like you're set with Scala, but another advanced JVM language option
is XTend (http://www.eclipse.org/xtend/).
They recently added GWT support:
http://blog.efftinge.de/2012/08/gwt-programming-with-xtend.html
On Thursday, September 20, 2012 1:23:06 PM UTC-5, Clint Gilbert wrote:
What is your opinion on the future of GWT?
How should GWT develop?
What technologies should it better support?
...
We all would like to get answers to these questions, right? To do so, we
created survey with help of Ray Cromwell, Artur Signell, Mike Brock, David
Chandler, Daniel Kurka and
One question missing from the survey that would have been interesting is the
number of people using Maven with GWT.
On 19/09/12 14:23, Joonas Lehtinen wrote:
What is your opinion on the future of GWT?
How should GWT develop?
What technologies should it better support?
...
We all would like
I wish I could change my responses. I forgot about the single biggest
improvement I would like to see on the long term roadmap: support for Java
8 language features
On Wednesday, 19 September 2012 07:23:24 UTC-6, Joonas Lehtinen wrote:
What is your opinion on the future of GWT?
How should
Please excuse me for this negative feedback, but in my opinion, the survey
is rather suggestive in that it presupposes that GWT should develop into
something that better supports other technologies. It asks a series of
questions that point in this direction (and it offers some free text
Please excuse me for this stupid question, but the survey was made in aspx,
not in GWT It means something?
Em quarta-feira, 19 de setembro de 2012 10h23min24s UTC-3, Joonas Lehtinen
escreveu:
What is your opinion on the future of GWT?
How should GWT develop?
What technologies should it
Yes it does - we wanted to be practical by not choosing survey tool based
on the technology used to implement it :)
On Wednesday, September 19, 2012 9:11:13 PM UTC+3, Mauro wrote:
Please excuse me for this stupid question, but the survey was made in
aspx, not in GWT It means something?
Sorry - the intention was to keep the survey as neutral as possible. We
definitely did not want to suggest anything with the questions.
I fully agree with your point of keeping GWT a lean focused low core
framework with no limitations. Other libraries that build on top of that
(like Vaadin and
Hi Chris,
I absolutely get your feedback and (at least to me) its a given that we
will keep GWT as open and lean as possible. It should not get in your way
or impose a special way of developing. It should be a great platform to
build on.
Thank you for placing your feedback here, I don`t think
I hope we can also avoid the other extreme: GWT hijacked by developers of
commercial libraries, trying to keep GWT as basic as possible, so that
their libraries look even more attractive in comparison. I exaggerate to
make a point, I know they are good people :)
I would love to see a unified
35 matches
Mail list logo
