Re: deferred binding for a/b and cohort testing framework - what do you think

2012-06-26 Thread Colin Alworth
With soft-permutations though, this could cut back on the explosion, though you are right that the app would be unable to switch at runtime between which version it is running. That said, once a user has been set to a particular set of features, you probably want to keep them there. And a runAs

Re: deferred binding for a/b and cohort testing framework - what do you think

2012-06-24 Thread Nick Siderakis
Some reasons why this is a bad idea - Does not scale well for many tests (permutation explosion) - Would not support dynamic (in app) cohort assignment runAsync seems like a better choice. On Sunday, June 24, 2012 1:43:01 PM UTC-4, Nick Siderakis wrote: > > I'm thinking about building a sm

deferred binding for a/b and cohort testing framework - what do you think

2012-06-24 Thread Nick Siderakis
I'm thinking about building a small framework similar to cohorts.js for GWT that takes advantage of deferred binding. Does this seem like a good idea? ( cohorts.js https://github.com/jamesyu/cohorts ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web To