Comment by saglikpasaji:
Genel içerik ve özgün makaleler ile a
href=http://www.saglikpasaji.com;sağlık/a pasajı sizler ile burada a
href=http://www.saglikpasaji.com;dengeli beslenme/aküçüklerin a
href=http://www.oyuncun.com;oyun oyna/ama merağını a
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/959801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/957801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Ready for re-review.
Also, I forgot to call out another significant change: the separation
between ValueBoxBase and TextBoxBase was pretty dirty before, with VBB
depending upon the nasty pre-enum type TextBoxBase.TextAlignConstant.
Added
an enum and setAlignment method to VBB, and deprecated the
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 2:21 PM, rj...@google.com wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/959801/diff/4001/5001
File
user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/server/JsonRequestProcessor.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/959801/diff/4001/5001#newcode78
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/959801/diff/5004/20001
File
user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/server/JsonRequestProcessor.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/959801/diff/5004/20001#newcode77
user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/server/JsonRequestProcessor.java:77:
Oops, nevermind on the Why keep the test comment, I was confused.
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/959801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/957801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 4:10 PM, rj...@google.com wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/959801/diff/5004/20001
File
user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/server/JsonRequestProcessor.java
(right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/959801/diff/5004/20001#newcode77
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/863801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/863801/diff/32001/33004
File samples/common.ant.xml (right):
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/863801/diff/32001/33004#newcode100
samples/common.ant.xml:100: /classpath
On 2010/10/04 20:52:02, bobv wrote:
Low priority: Can you extract this classpath as an
LGTM
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Amit Manjhi amitman...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 4:10 PM, rj...@google.com wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/959801/diff/5004/20001
File
user/src/com/google/gwt/requestfactory/server/JsonRequestProcessor.java
(right):
Revision: 8945
Author: amitman...@google.com
Date: Tue Oct 5 14:47:46 2010
Log: Send an update notification to a stale client by comparing the
incoming version
number with the version number on the server.
Hacked the test harness so that the version number is only incremented on a
real
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/957801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Submitted so that I'd get out of Phil's way.
On 2010/10/06 01:55:20, rjrjr wrote:
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/957801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Revision: 8947
Author: fabb...@google.com
Date: Tue Oct 5 21:24:05 2010
Log: Edited wiki page DefaultLocaleBinding through web user interface.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=8947
Modified:
/wiki/DefaultLocaleBinding.wiki
===
---
Reviewers: jlabanca,
Description:
Fixing the javadoc build breaks. One problem is that the doc/build.xml
has drifted stale against user/build.xml's classpath (we should unify
them, but the goal here is to fix the break); another is citing
@examples that don't (yet) exist.
Please review this
LGTM
http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/963801/show
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Revision: 8948
Author: rj...@google.com
Date: Tue Oct 5 18:38:29 2010
Log: Fix checkstyle mess in gwt.app blow up patch.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=8948
Modified:
/trunk/user/test/com/google/gwt/activity/ActivitySuite.java
Revision: 8949
Author: fabb...@google.com
Date: Tue Oct 5 19:40:24 2010
Log: Fixing the javadoc build breaks. One problem is that the doc/build.xml
has drifted stale against user/build.xml's classpath (we should unify
them, but the goal here is to fix the break); another is citing
@examples
201 - 220 of 220 matches
Mail list logo