>
>
> No, Google is not converting all Java to JS to abandon Java, it's the
> exact opposite. Google needs to support 4 platforms with it's code
>
>
OK, that is almost calming.
> But the Gmail team is 12 years old, we have a vast codebase that includes
> a lot of JS...
>
That is fine. I
The source code of Elemental2 is now available on github:
https://github.com/google/elemental2
Please refer to the project README for more information about how to use it.
If you have any questions/issues, feel free to open a bug in the github
project.
Important note: Elemental2 is in beta
Hi,
I'm new to GWT, joining an existing project using GWT 2.7, and
gwtbootstrap3, rev 0.9.3
I need to change a label to a popdown menu. I tried using a ListBox, but
it's look widely varies across browsers ignoring font size and more, and is
almost uniformly ugly.
But the ListBox has the right
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Learner Evermore <
learner.everm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So... If I read this correctly... Google has discovered that GWT is not
> good enough (is bad) to continue using it. It is creating a J2CL that
> produces readable code so that it can completely abandon its
When I first encountered this problem, GWT 2.8.1 wasn't even released. I
got this error at random times while developing using SDM incremental
compilation. See my earlier post on the subject -
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit/rdoCr79EQbE/discussion -
it's from 2016.
On
If you use a framework that uses 2.8.0 and importing 2.8.1 yourself. In
that case exclude everything that the library is importing. We use gwt
amterial and there this helps. Some dependencies in gwt have changed andthe
changes result in these conflicts.
Marteijn
Op donderdag 18 mei 2017
Is there a way I can access J2CL code? Not open source?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
It is indeed a performance penalty, but is required to avoid conflicts with
built-in properties (such as __proto__). For modern browsers we could probably
use Map nowadays.
You should bring this to gwt-contrib!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
>
>
> Google didn't have any incentive to release GWT 10 years ago, or to
> continue maintaining it in the open source. They've always been the main
> drivers and main contributors so they could have stopped sync'ing their
> internal repository to the outside work long ago; but they did just
Hi, it seems like compute of String.hashCode lead to making a new string to
be created each call: String key = ":" + str;
Isnt it a performance penalty ?
I removed body of StringHashCache.getHashCode and replaced it with simple
return compute(str);
After that I got 15x times boost in my
On Friday, May 19, 2017 at 2:45:37 PM UTC+2, Learner Evermore wrote:
>
> So... If I read this correctly... Google has discovered that GWT is not
> good enough (is bad) to continue using it. It is creating a J2CL that
> produces readable code so that it can completely abandon its original Java
My responses to specific points:
Removing JSNI, , generators... we ourselves were careful
enough to either never use some of these and/or to abstract and encapsulate
their use. However everyone here seems to take the perspective of "it is
just one product of one company that is affected". It
So... If I read this correctly... Google has discovered that GWT is not
good enough (is bad) to continue using it. It is creating a J2CL that
produces readable code so that it can completely abandon its original Java
source and continue without it. The already slow involvement will turn into
On Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 9:37:58 PM UTC+2, Relja Pcela wrote:
>
> It would be really nice to see some new answers on this kind of questions
> from GWT contributors other than: "We don't know how GWT3 will look like in
> this moment but we know that J2CL will not include this and that"
Hi,
On Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 6:29:29 PM UTC+2, Learner Evermore wrote:
>
> Hi there!
>
> I am faced with having to re-think what we are doing in the company I work
> for with respect to GWT, existing and new projects and I am struggling, to
> say the least. We've been very much a GWT shop
On Friday, May 19, 2017 at 10:35:29 AM UTC+2, Relja Pcela wrote:
>
> Can somebody please tell us who are the members of gwt committee
>
That page is *almost* up-to-date: http://www.gwtproject.org/steering.html
(Ray has been replaced by Bhaskar Janakiraman as he moved to the Inbox team
Can somebody please tell us who are the members of gwt committee and is
there any meeting notes in the last year (or two) ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
17 matches
Mail list logo
