Good day to everyone. I am the proud owner/developer/code money
responsible for a fairly new GWT application at my workplace.
Overall, the response to the application has been quite good and it
has been a pleasant change from the (now legacy) JSP development I
still have to do. Today, however,
Excellent - I am not alone in my troubles. On second thought, perhaps
rejoicing in the sharing of pain is not the most healthy viewpoint to
take ...
The post to the older discussion was quite useful. The blog linked
there has some pretty good information on how this same issue has been
dealt
, 10:38 am, Jeff Chimene jchim...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/13/2010 08:52 AM, Ben Imp wrote:
Excellent - I am not alone in my troubles. On second thought, perhaps
rejoicing in the sharing of pain is not the most healthy viewpoint to
take ...
The post to the older discussion was quite useful
There are many ways of laying out a web page. The simplest in your
case might be to add both widgets to a VerticalPanel that then lives
inside of that FlowPanel you mention. You could then use CSS and make
the VerticalPanel have little to no space between its cells.
Another, and perhaps a more
to strict mode, i. e. not using quirks mode panels
like VerticalPanel.
Thank you for the second recommendation. I am not used to work with
CSS in detail. Which property should I use to position my anchors?
Thanks
Magnus
On Dec 22, 4:12 pm, Ben Imp benlee...@gmail.com wrote:
There are many ways
Opening a new window is as simple as a call to Window.open. However,
since your GWT client keeps all of its state in javascript your new
window will know nothing of the old window. You can pass some
arguments to this new window to get it in the right initial state, but
thats about it.
-Ben
On
You would be looking for the FileUpload widget, which just wraps a
html file input element.
-Ben
On Dec 28, 2:15 am, jc jc.chan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
i am new to GWT, but i know java. I am using GWT in Eclipse. for
selecting a file in local directory in java, we use JFileChooser.
but i
Two pieces of information seem to be absent that would greatly aid
others in helping you: the exception details and the input string.
-Ben
On Dec 27, 5:19 pm, Luka Matovic matovicl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys, I have a little, stupid problem but it seems that I can't
find solution for it. I
I haven't seen anything in GWT that would predispose it to being
either kind of client. Similar to Java or other more traditional
development languages, you can make it as fat or thin as you want.
I might put forth the idea that since JavaScript isn't exactly great
at crunching bits, it does
While I am not from Google, I have done the very thing you are asking
about, so I can confirm GWT's suitability for such tasks. We are
using Tomcat with an Apache proxy. The site does face the internet,
but it is restricted to employees of the firm, and most of the usage
is from inside the
Perhaps you just snipped out the code, but in the bit you posted here
I don't see anything adding any strings to the picUps ArrayList. The
selection cell uses that array to build its options, so if that
collection is empty, then that would explain your empty combo box
issue.
-Ben
On Jan 4,
I'd hazard a guess that it means that your GameStatus class doesn't
implement the IsSerializable interface, which GWT requires of objects
you try to send across the wire.
-Ben
On Jan 4, 11:35 am, Magnus alpineblas...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I receive the following error message:
Server
Serializable should work, post GWT 1.4 anyway.
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/1.6/FAQ_Server.html#Does_the_GWT_RPC_system_support_the_use_of_java.io.Serializable
Check the Javadoc for that exception and you should see a list of the
other possible things that could cause it.
-Ben
On Jan
There is (as far as I am aware) no built in mechanism to handle this
kind of thing. I had a discussion on this not too long ago.
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/thread/94bbcb3720f83605
The general conclusion was to roll your own, if you feel as though it
is worth
Unfortunately, you are stuck with the old java.util.Date object. GWT
as of yet has nothing more to offer.
There is the DateTimeFormat class, which will allow you to parse bits
out of the date object, and possibly construct the date object if you
mash your three combo boxes into a suitable
GWT.isClient().
http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/javadoc/2.1/com/google/gwt/core/client/GWT.html
-Ben
On Jan 5, 9:02 am, nacho vela.igna...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a similar issue with translations in shared code.
Is there any way to know if the code is running on server side or
I experienced this as well. I noticed it right after I upgraded to
GWT 2.1, so I assume that must have done it. I've ignored it so far,
as no one in my organization seems to care, but I must admit, I am
curious as to the cause.
-Ben
On Jan 5, 9:51 am, Dan danpr...@gmail.com wrote:
My
I believe if you additionally set the row count to 0, it will stop the
spinner.
-Ben
On Jan 5, 10:56 am, Néstor Boscán nesto...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
When I add a new CellView Widget without any rows I get a time spinner
inside the CellView. Is there a way to eliminate the time spinner.
Unfortunately, some things are still different between browsers. Your
CSS, for instance, GWT doesn't do anything with. IE tends to render
things just a wee bit different in some cases, depending on your CSS,
so you are still stuck with testing across all of them.
I can't say I have ever missed
Have you pondered simply not using the Places? I'm not sure if this
is a requirement (or simply a strongly desired outcome) of your
project, but if not, then you can simply roll your own MVP framework.
In the case of my company, we started using GWT before the new place
stuff came about, so we
It looks like you aren't setting the expiry date on the cookie. I
believe by default those expire when the session dies. That might be
your issue.
-Ben
On Jan 6, 7:23 am, Noor baken...@gmail.com wrote:
I am becoming almost mad with the GWT Cookies,
in one of my application I set the cookie
I use a delegate pattern to do this very thing. Its really the only
way to keep presenter logic where it belongs without polluting your
namespace with widgets. The SuggestBox is none the wiser. Just make
sure your delegator handles the base case where its delegate oracle is
null, of course,
Whenever you add an event handler to the SimpleEventBus (or even a
widget for that matter), it will return an instance of a
HandlerRegistration object. That object has only one purpose - to
remove the handler. Just hold onto those objects somewhere, and when
your tab gets closed, have them all
I've experienced similar issues with virus scanners and developing in
general. I've found that just telling the scanner to ignore the
eclipse folder and the workspace folder will take care of pretty much
everything.
-Ben
On Jan 10, 12:16 pm, GeeDee daniel.wh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We've
Personally, I prefer to use good old option d: None Of The Above. I
must disclose that I have, at most, dabbled in those technologies, so
you probably shouldn't take too much stock in my opinion. I tend to
have a pretty strong bias against generated code of any kind. This
likely stems from my
You can pretty much put a public static final String in any old class
in any package you want. Reference away. I usually make one class
(ApplicationConstants) to stuff all of these in, and put it in the
root package for the project.
[unwanted-design-comments]
This is unrelated, but it sounds
Widgets are client side things only, so you can't really create them
on the server and send them across the wire.
The simplest solution I can think of would be to take the data in the
DB that you are reading, package it up all nicely in some kind of data
object, and ship it to the client. The
I am running IE8 / Windows 7 and have not had any issues with the GWT
combo boxes.
-Ben
On Jan 13, 1:49 pm, skippy al.leh...@fisglobal.com wrote:
Any chance anyone else has this problem?
On Dec 15 2010, 12:46 pm, skippy al.leh...@fisglobal.com wrote:
This is atill a problem.
However, it
The GWT compiler requires the Java source for any class you want to
use on the client side, as part of its job is to translate that Java
code to JavaScript.
-Ben
On Jan 13, 3:20 pm, Ryan Rathsam rrath...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Have a quick question. We're currently trying to use some
You could attach two ClickHandlers to it, instead of subclassing the
widget and overriding methods. I generally try to avoid subclassing a
widget if at all possible.
-Ben
On Jan 14, 4:48 am, Vik vik@gmail.com wrote:
Hie
I have an address component which is a vertical panel with state,
As much as I prefer teaching men how to fish to throwing fish at them,
mostly because fish are delicious, I think I'll chuck one out now.
ClickHandler myFirstHandler = new ClickHandler() {... stuff ...};
ClickHandler mySecondHandler = new ClickHandler() {... stuff ...};
Button pressMePlease =
And, as a minor addendum, the code in those jars can only use the
parts of the JRE that GWT has implemented.
Hence why I cannot have the Apache commons utils on the client, even
though the source is available.
-Ben
On Jan 14, 1:00 pm, nacho vela.igna...@gmail.com wrote:
You can include JARs,
I'd recommend simply extending the AsyncCallback. Its undoubtedly
more work up front, but its also not a hack, which is a Good Thing.
Its easy to understand, and future maintainers of the program will
thank you for that. Also, karma will likely stab you in the eye if
you don't.
-Ben
On Jan 14,
I'm not sure how it works with Places (haven't used them), but with
normal GWT history its just History.back() and you're done.
-Ben
On Jan 14, 4:24 pm, zixzigma zixzi...@gmail.com wrote:
how can we programmatically go to the previous place, similar functionality
like browser back button,
The view part of a pure MVP design is entirely passive. It will
expose (via an interface) a set of methods and widgets (interfaces
only) to the presenter, and thats pretty much it. It takes no action
on its own, or at least as little as it can get away with given
whatever framework restrictions
Suggest boxes currently have a bug.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=3533
I went through the same hassle ... icky stuff. I ended up wrapping
the SuggestBox with another class that intercepted any handlers added
to it and wrapped them with a de-duplication handler.
Revenge of the Zombie Thread ...
I am currently the owner/maintainer/code monkey behind a fairly
complex GWT application. It is primarily data driven, but there is
plenty of logic in the UI for role-based editing permissions,
visibility, and coordinating different components of the application.
It looks like you either have an old version of Java installed (pre
1.5) or (more likely) your Java compiler compliance settings in
eclipse are set up to not allow 1.5+ syntax.
-Ben
On Jan 18, 5:38 am, Jamie jamie.ma...@skybet.com wrote:
When creating a new web application project I get the
Unfortunately, I have only ever worked on GWT projects with a small
number of developers (2-3), so I can't offer any real advice on
scaling. Heck, even my traditional application development capped out
at around a half dozen or so on a team.
Might I inquire as to what you will be doing with that
I solve this issue by having a single application wide event bus that
is passed to all of the presenters in my application. I bundle it up
with other application resources, such as a navigation control and an
application wide model, and simply hand it to them in the
constructor. So, if I wanted
Welcome to the wonderful world of Java dates. Dates without a time
component don't exist in this strange place, so the simplest solution
I've found is to just create your own date class and store three
integers.
-Ben
On Jan 19, 2:46 am, Sreekanth Nambiar pk.sreeka...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The correct thing to do, in my mind anyway (admittedly an odd place),
is never trust a client and do your own validation of the data and
operation requested. This contrasts with my professional experience,
which has been that pretty much everyone just trusts the client and
mindlessly follows its
Events allow you to synchronize two concurrently active presenters.
If you never have more than one presenter active in your application
at a given time, then this becomes less of an issue.
-Ben
On Jan 20, 8:01 am, ailinykh ailin...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do you need events? Each Activity is
Sounds like classic infinite recursion to me. I can't see the code,
but if your service call simply calls itself again on failure, and you
don't track a failure count anywhere, I could see that spinning around
infinitely and blowing up.
-Ben
On Jan 20, 1:24 pm, mike b mbaker.t...@gmail.com
You never seem to actually set the 'tml' variable to anything besides
null, so I'm guessing that's your issue.
-Ben
On Jan 20, 3:45 pm, AmaraSat amara.forthewo...@gmail.com wrote:
static HTML tml = null;
String HeatParametersString = ;
for (int i = 0; i Properties.length; i++) {
I've only used Selenium for GWT client testing. It worked as we
expected it to. The learning curve has a bit of a bump at first, due
to the somewhat confusing way they name things and have you configure
a test suite. Nothing to do specifically with GWT, mind you.
I must mention that we have
Its in the FAQ. In fact, its the first result when you search for
Tomcat on the GWT site. I highly recommend reading through the all of
the docs there.
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/1.6/FAQ_DebuggingAndCompiling.html#How_do_I_use_my_own_server_in_hosted_mode_instead_of_GWT%27s
-Ben
On
My Right Thing is as follows.
I will generally do some transformation work on the server side. Not
to HTML, mind you, since that, to me, is purely presentation layer
work. Rather, I will take the raw data and package it into lean
records objects, and send the collection of those to the client.
I don't believe a web browser will let you access anything like a
microphone. A flash plugin can access such things, but thats about
it.
-Ben
On Feb 2, 11:08 pm, dhruti dhruti...@gmail.com wrote:
hi
i m gwt designer.
i working with app in which i want to enroll users voice at the time
of
Indeed. The alternative of sending all date operations to the server
is ... incredibly inconvenient at best.
-Ben
On Feb 3, 7:20 am, Jeff Schwartz jefftschwa...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you will find that you are not alone in your opinion regarding using
deprecated methods and that you are in
As far as I am aware, there is no such widget. You will have to make
one.
-Ben
On Feb 3, 3:24 am, sujit mishra sujit.u...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi ,
I need help regards datetimepicke widget . I am using GWT but not
found any widget that able to capture date and time both at a
time
(new ValueChangeHandlerDate(){
@Override
public void onValueChange(ValueChangeEventDate event) {
...
}
});
...
I hope this helps.
Jeff
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Ben Imp benlee...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I am aware
I have a possible alternative suggestion - instead of messing with the
browser's history function, simply don't use the history tokens for
navigating through the results list. Then your back button will work
as you will want it to.
I do this in my application, and it seems to work quite well.
I have an application factory that gets passed into all of my
presenters. This factory has methods on it for creating the various
kinds of popups that will occur in the application, and covers them
all in a nice clean interface.
Seems to work quite well.
-Ben
On Feb 5, 10:57 pm, TigerFox
I believe your problem is the lack of a web server. IE doesn't like
people opening JS-laced web pages from the local drive. Probably a
security concern, I would imagine. I have noticed this with non-GWT
html as well, as I will often create little html test harnesses for
some jQuery work, and I
You could run a local web server. I always deploy my application to a
local Tomcat server for testing.
-Ben
On Feb 10, 3:09 pm, othman othmanelmou...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Ben,
So there is no solution other to accept and live with this security
restriction in IE?
On Feb 10, 8:52 pm, Ben
will be run from user's local file system
without deploying in a web server.
why IE made this security restriction? and why this doesn't happen in
Firefox and Chrome?
On Feb 10, 9:34 pm, Ben Imp benlee...@gmail.com wrote:
You could run a local web server. I always deploy my application
One way to do this would be to put your view list inside of a factory
object. This factory object would have a method to request a view for
a given id, and return a new instance of it. The creation of that
view would take place inside of a runAsync block. Your page
controller would have to pass
Sounds like some Cell Widgets might be a perfect fit for you.
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideUiCellWidgets.html
-Ben
On Feb 14, 8:51 am, denis56 denis.ergashb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I wonder if it is a usual practice to use Element objects instead of
Widgets in GWT
Did you give each of your radio button sets different names? Radio
button groups are defined by their names.
-Ben
On Feb 13, 2:13 pm, Dallas007 nandigam...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have installed IE8 yesterday and Win XP OS.
The problem is radio button selection is not working properly. I
else?
From
Narayana
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Ben Imp benlee...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you give each of your radio button sets different names? Radio
button groups are defined by their names.
-Ben
On Feb 13, 2:13 pm, Dallas007 nandigam...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have
).newInstance();?!
On 14 Feb., 17:50, Ben Imp benlee...@gmail.com wrote:
One way to do this would be to put your view list inside of a factory
object. This factory object would have a method to request a view for
a given id, and return a new instance of it. The creation of that
view would take
If you are trying to format a date, which appears to be the case, you
can use DateTimeFormat.
-Ben
On Feb 15, 12:36 pm, Magnus alpineblas...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I need String.format:
String r = String.format(%2d %2d:%2d:%2d,d,h,m,s);
Since GWT does not support this method: What can
Sounds like an awful lot of extra work to simply avoid learning CSS.
Don't get me wrong, CSS is kind of clunky, but I find it hard to
imagine that this new solution would be significantly more elegant.
-Ben
On Feb 16, 8:31 pm, Kurtt kurtt@gmail.com wrote:
GWT 2.2 introduces the Canvas,
So ... curious ... runAsync provides a callback to let you know when
its done doing its thing. Why aren't you just using that to know when
you can mess with the objects you have created? To me, that is the
bug, not anything in particular to do with what order GWT runs things
asynchronously.
I find it awkward as well. I have worked around it by providing a
delegating oracle on creation of the suggest box. Not exactly ideal,
but a rather simple fix.
-Ben
On Feb 17, 1:29 pm, Eric edimickeast...@gmail.com wrote:
So, SuggestBox.setOracle(SuggestOracle oracle) is private. I can't
Use unique click handlers. Then each clickhandler knows where it
came from, so to speak, and can use a unique callback to update the
appropriate widgets.
Alternatively, you could pass an enum of some kind to a common click
handler, and case through the possibilities in the callback. To me,
You cannot return something from an async call like that. The work
will be done asynchronously, and the main program has presumably gone
on its merry way while the async things are being done.
If some object needs that result, a simple solution would be to pass
the object into the async method,
It seems like you are using a singleton event bus. I would assume all
three entities are registered with that bus to handle the
SelectEntitiesEvent. If thats the case, then I don't see why all
three wouldn't have their listeners triggered. The event they
registered for did get fired.
-Ben
On
pm, Ben Imp benlee...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems like you are using a singleton event bus. I would assume all
three entities are registered with that bus to handle the
SelectEntitiesEvent. If thats the case, then I don't see why all
three wouldn't have their listeners triggered. The event
of the method body within onSucces() then will the
code split for this portion of method be succesful?
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Ben Imp benlee...@gmail.com wrote:
You cannot return something from an async call like that. The work
will be done asynchronously, and the main program has
I assume you are building an ANT script. If so, then it means
something like this.
java classname=com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler fork=true
maxmemory=256M
arg line=-style DETAILED -war ${dist} ${gwt.module}/
!--Uncomment this line to get a detailed
There is GWT.isClient(). I'm not certain if the compiler will ignore
the unused chunks, however.
-Ben
On Feb 25, 12:22 am, lalit lalit.bh...@gmail.com wrote:
I know that certain methods in my class are never going to be used in
client side. They are specific to server. Can I somehow notify
You could create a composite async request object. Its constructor
would take a list of special async requests, and it would execute them
in order. They would have to be special as you would need some way to
attach listeners to them to know when each is done (the base interface
doesn't provide
This is basically what I have implemented in my system as well. Our
user roles are in the DB and I keep a copy on the client so all of the
presenters can inspect it to see what the user can do.
I should mention that double-checking the permissions on the server
side for all requests is a very
You can probably simulate a red border by surrounding the list box
with a div, which you could add a border color to. IE should actually
listen to that one. I don't think you can style the drop down arrow
at all. From my understanding, form elements are kind of limited in
how you can alter
I'm pretty sure IIS can't handle Java servlets, at least not out of
the box (someone please correct me if I am mistaken). I'd want to be
testing on the same application server as I was deploying on anyway.
-Ben
On Mar 1, 11:07 pm, dg damaya...@bitscrape.com wrote:
I will develop a web
Depends on the situation, but in general its much easier on users if
things they can't do/edit aren't shown to them. Or, alternatively, if
they are shown, be shown with some visual indicator of restricted
access. A panel full of blank values with no UI feedback is somewhat
unintuitive. A panel
Server-side GWT is just plain old java. I'd suggest reading up on the
JDBC documentation.
http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/jdbc/
-Ben
On Mar 3, 3:14 pm, Mohammed Magdi moh_ma...@acm.org wrote:
yes in Java
thanks
magdi
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Juan Pablo
I cannot say I've observed the same behavior. The browser may be
caching your CSS, though. Hit refresh a few times and I'd wager you
will see your changes.
-Ben
On Mar 4, 7:40 am, Andrey mino...@gmail.com wrote:
When running GWT app in dev mode static web resources such as css-
files cannot
The issue tracker is public.
http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5320
-Ben
On Mar 4, 12:44 am, Deepak Singh deepaksingh...@gmail.com wrote:
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group,
If I am understanding you correctly, you worry about having to deploy
the whole war for small changes, like a quick bugfix or the like.
As far as I am aware, there isn't really a way to partially deploy a
GWT application, like only those parts that changed. In theory, I
suppose, you might be
I believe GWT already does that. The browser should only be loading
one of the permutations.
You should look at code splitting. Cutting out code you dont need
couldn't hurt either.
-Ben
On Mar 4, 11:18 am, sridevi macherla sridevimache...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there any mechanism to generate
GWT has the concept of a history token to preserve your application's
context. You shouldn't need to be parsing the URL.
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideCodingBasicsHistory.html
-Ben
On Mar 4, 11:20 am, cri chuck.irvine...@gmail.com wrote:
I saw another post on this
Oh, I missed the bit where you are accessing resources outside of the
GWT app.
Icky ...
I punt.
-Ben
On Mar 4, 12:09 pm, Ben Imp benlee...@gmail.com wrote:
GWT has the concept of a history token to preserve your application's
context. You shouldn't need to be parsing the URL.
http
You can hold onto a handle in pure JS.
http://www.w3schools.com/jsref/met_win_open.asp
I don't believe GWT gives you a way to access this handle, however.
-Ben
On Mar 14, 2:19 pm, Ice13ill andrei.fifi...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to get a handle to the windows opened by a certain
I am quite curious how it is that you can not have access to the
server side stack trace. I suspect the answer to your question lies
there.
-Ben
On Mar 14, 7:04 am, Dilip Rathod rathod...@gmail.com wrote:
I can gwt-rpc communication with server sucessfully.
but when i want to interact with
Yeah, I've been meaning to do something like that in my application.
The current lack of details on the client isn't very pleasant for
users or developers. SSH-ing into the prod server is annoying as
well. I'm always worried about breaking something with a twitchy rm -
rf finger.
I'm still
You are running your application in development mode, which means you
are probably running it from your IDE. Its used for debugging and fun
stuff like that.
If you compile and deploy your web application to a server, like
Apache or Tomcat, you wont get that.
It looks like there is a setHTML method on the MenuItem. I'd imagine
you could use that to put a table element in there, with a left and
right cell, and then differently align the contents of those.
I can't say I've tried to do this, mind you, but it seems like it
should work.
-Ben
On Mar 18,
If I saw #2 in any code I was responsible for I would hunt down and
beat the person who wrote it. With a rusty spork.
I may be slightly resentful of having bad code dumped on me.
Possibly...
Defining your methods return type is good practice. I recommend
creating a result object to return for
Perhaps if you provided details, people here might have something to
go on to try and help you.
As it stands, my only advice would be to use the IE developer tools
and inspect the DOM elements where things look different.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd565628%28VS.85%29.aspx
-Ben
On
As far as I am aware, adding a new history token only fires history
events. Unless you are listening to them, it shouldn't do anything.
I haven't used the GWT MVP framework, though. If you are using that,
this may be the result of some baked-in behavior.
-Ben
On Mar 21, 10:11 am, Navigateur
I've found using ORM in GWT to be pretty much the same as using it in
any other setting. If you like it, go for it. I personally do not
care for it, as I've found, at least in the projects I've worked on,
that the added complexity doesn't seem to pay off. I'd rather just
write a thin DAO layer
If you want to use them on the client side, you must have the source
code for GWT to translate to JS. In addition, this code must be
compatible with GWT's subset of Java.
Using third party jars on the server side, on the other hand, is just
straight Java.
I would hazard a guess that your issue
The more generic your remote interface, the more code the GWT compiler
generates to try and handle all the possible values you may pass
through it.
Having a method that can take something of type Serializable would, I
believe, make the GWT compiler generate code for all possible types,
since you
You shouldn't need to override any methods just to add scrollbars. Im
curious as to why you want to do that. You should be able to just
nest the panels, as you have done.
-Ben
On Mar 29, 12:40 am, Olivier Diotte oliv...@diotte.ca wrote:
Hi,
I am new to GWT (and not that expert in Java) and
I suppose the obvious thing to investigate would be whether ???/
myfolder/report.html is visible to http requests. That will depend on
where exactly your code is writing this HTML file to and whether your
app server and/or web server allow reading from that location.
-Ben
On Mar 29, 10:26 am,
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/2.1
You can twiddle the version in the upper left by clicking on it.
-Ben
On Mar 30, 11:12 am, cri chuck.irvine...@gmail.com wrote:
We are currently at version 2.1 of GWT and I'm trying to implement
sorting of CellTables. The online (2.2) GWT
You could set the title attribute of the text field.
http://www.w3schools.com/tags/att_standard_title.asp
-Ben
On Mar 31, 8:57 am, SVR svr...@gmail.com wrote:
Ho to display hint text (like a date format, currency symbol etc) to a text
field. Is there any built in feature to do this in GWT?
I
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
