03 PM, Thad wrote:
> I'm seeing the problem on my Linux box running 1.5.0_17. So long as
> the gold standard here is running on Macs, I don't want to develop in
> 1.6 for fear of something that won't target 1.5 properly (I've been
> bitten on this before).
>
>
Thanks for the heads up, we'll get this fixed asap. Glad to see that
everyone is perusing the latest doc.
- Chris
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Peter Recore wrote:
> The "building a UI" link on
> http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuide.html
> is dead.
>
> --
>
> You received thi
Yoshi,
Checkout the following thread for more info on specifying startup URLs:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit/browse_thread/thread/3afa63106371c06e/7a580496bee221fe
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:56 PM, anjolight wrote:
> Hi, sorry for a newbie question.
>
> With 1.7, Eclipse's
Dave,
That's an issue on our side that we've been meaning to fix. Let me know
which app you submitted and I'll take a look at it.
For anyone else having these issues, please don't hesitate to contact me
directly cramsd...@google.com.
Thanks,
Chris
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 4:10 PM, davidroe wrot
> > > > Same issue for me also.
> >
> > > > Windows Vista SP2 / IE 8.
> >
> > > > Works fine in Firefox.
> >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Kapil
> >
> > > > On Dec 8, 3:00 pm, Sekhar Ravinutala wrote:
> &
Back in May, at Google IO, we announced an integration between
VMware’s popular Spring framework for server-side development and GWT
for the client-side. Since then we have been excited by the feedback
and comments from customers building real world apps with this
technology. In response to their f
That's a great point, and we'll be there with M4. There's a Google snapshot
repository that we'll be using for the next milestone and subsequent RCs.
It's a single repo where we'll upload 2.1-BUILD-SNAPSHOT jars. Once we get
to GA, we'll be in Maven central.
-- Chris
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:21
This is true, you shouldn't be moderated on each post. Is this not the case?
-- Chris
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Shawn Brown wrote:
> >> Unfortunately, we have to manually approve posts from new members to
> >>. We typically review postings from new members several
> >> times a day. After
Here's a temporary link while we wait for update to propagate. Let me know
if it still doesn't work.
http://gwt.google.com/samples/MissingPlugin
-- Chris
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Chris Rowland <
chris.robert.rowl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm doing some work with the most recent version o
You can also use this link in the interim:
http://gwt.google.com/samples/MissingPlugin
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:45 AM, David Chandler (Google) <
drfibona...@google.com> wrote:
> Oops, there is a broken URL mapping. This will be fixed shortly.
>
> /dmc
> David Chandler
> Developer Programs Eng
There was an update on our side yesterday and the Developer Plugin page has
been restored. Please let us know if you still experience problems.
-- Chris
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Chris Ramsdale wrote:
> You can also use this link in the interim:
>
> http://gwt.google.co
I can say definitively that the GWT team is in the process of wrapping
up documentation on:
- Cell-based widgets
- RequestFactory
- Activities and Places
-- Chris
On Oct 1, 1:38 pm, Tommy Lui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please help me understand why Chris Ramsdale (Google's Developer
> Relations t
e more on GWT 2.1 MVP support in your book.
>
> Thanks,
> Yuri
>
> On Oct 5, 10:19 am, Chris Ramsdale wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Just to clarify, I donated my time to submit a few chapters and to
> > review some of the other content that is going into t
Aldo, we're still on track for a release in the Oct. timeframe. Is there
some other aspect that makes it a poor choice?
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Aldo wrote:
> My only question is: when will GWT 2.1 M4 be available? And when will
> it be released (the GA)? It seems like the due dates are
Aldo,
If this is a Roo-generated app, you'll need to wait to until Roo 1.1.1 is
released to upgrade to GWT 2.1.1. For now Roo-generated apps are only
compatible with GWT 2.1.
-- Chris
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Aldo Neto wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm using STS 2.5.1 (i.e. Eclipse 3.6) and tr
that ROO is about to release
> Roo 1.1.1 (Jan - 7th) and I assume the STS will be updated as well, so I'll
> keep working with the 2.1 for now until Roo is also updated.
>
> Thanks,
> Aldo
>
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Chris Ramsdale wrote:
>
>> Aldo,
>&g
We are looking at ways to have the Ext GWT and Smart GWT folks take over
this portion of the GWT Designer. For 2.2 we will have an updated stand
alone version that still has this support.
-- Chris
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Dave Laycock wrote:
> Will the final release have feature parity w
Today we're one step closer to shipping the Google Plugin for Eclipse and
GWT SDK 2.2. The first release candidates of both of these products are
ready for use, and can be installed and/or download via the links below.
Google Plugin for Eclipse 2.2 RC1 (including the GWT SDK)
Eclips
Thanks for all of the feedback. We're looking into the installation issues
and will have an update asap.
-- Chris
On Feb 14, 2011 11:33 AM, "alexoffspring" wrote:
> It cannot be considered acceptable to have all these problems just for
> an upgrade.
> Somebody from Google should tell where in the
This was mentioned later in the thread, but you don't have to use the GWT
Designer that is bundled with the Google Plugin for Eclipse. The standalone
version (link below) will work just fine w/ the GWT 2.2 SDK.
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/tools/download-gwtdesigner.html
The only requirement
t; We will be waiting for the update
>
>
> --alex
>
> On 15 Feb, 01:34, Chris Ramsdale wrote:
> > Thanks for all of the feedback. We're looking into the installation
> issues
> > and will have an update asap.
> >
> > -- Chris
> > On Feb 14, 201
201 - 221 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
